Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2002-4
Analysis of the Virological Response with Respect to Baseline Viral Phenotype and Genotype in Protease Inhibitor-Experienced HIV-1-Infected Patients Receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir Therapy
The virological response of multiple protease inhibitor-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive, HIV-1-infected subjects was examined with respect to baseline viral phenotype and genotype through 72 weeks of therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir plus efavirenz and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Study M98-957). Using a ‘dropouts as censored’ analysis, plasma HIV RNA ≤400 copies/ml was observed in 93% (25/27), 73% (11/15) and 25% (2/8) of subjects with <10-fold, 10- to 40-fold, and >40-fold reduced susceptibility to lopinavir at baseline, respectively. In addition, virological response was observed in 91% (21/23), 71% (15/21) and 33% (2/6) of subjects with baseline lopinavir mutation score of 0–5, 6–7 and ≥8, respectively. Through 72 weeks, all subjects experiencing virological failure whose baseline isolates contained six or more protease inhibitor mutations had a common genotypic pattern, with mutations at positions 82, 54 and 10, along with a median of four additional mutations in protease. However, an equal number of subjects with a similar genotypic pattern experienced virological response. Further analysis revealed the baseline phenotypic susceptibility to lopinavir to be an additional covariate predicting response in this subset of subjects. In multivariate analyses, baseline susceptibility to lopinavir was associated with response at each time point examined (weeks 24, 48 and 72). These results provide guidance for clinically relevant interpretation of phenotypic and genotypic resistance tests when applied to lopinavir/ritonavir.
References
1.
DeeksS.G., HellmannN.S., GrantR.M., ParkinN.T., PetropoulosC.J., BeckerM., SymondsW., ChesneyM., & VolberdingP.A.Novel four-drug salvage treatment regimens after failure of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-containing regimen: antiviral activity and correlation of baseline phenotypic drug susceptibility with virologic outcome. Journal of Infectious Diseases1999; 179: 1375–1381.
2.
HarriganP.R., HertogsK., VerbiestW., PauwelsR., LarderB., KempS., BloorS., YipB., HoggR., AlexanderC., & MontanerJ.S.Baseline HIV drug resistance profile predicts response to ritonavir-saquinavir protease inhibitor therapy in a community setting. AIDS1999; 13: 1863–1871.
3.
PikettyC., RaceE., CastielP., BelecL., PeytavinG., Si-MohamedA., Gonzalez-CanaliG., WeissL., ClavelF., & KazatchkineM.D.Efficacy of a five-drug combination including ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz in patients who failed on a conventional triple-drug regimen: phenotypic resistance to protease inhibitors predicts outcome of therapy. AIDS1999; 13: F71–F77.
4.
ParaM.F., GliddenD.V., CoombsR.W., CollierA.C., CondraJ.H., CraigC., BassettR., LeavittR., SnyderS., McAuliffeV., & BoucherC.Baseline human immunodeficiency virus type 1 phenotype, genotype, and RNA response after switching from long-term hard-capsule saquinavir to indinavir or soft-gel-capsule saquinavir in AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 333. Journal of Infectious Diseases2000; 182: 733–743.
5.
MillerV., Cozzi-LepriA., HertogsK., GuteP., LarderB., BloorS., KlaukeS., RabenauH., PhillipsA., & StaszewskiS.HIV drug susceptibility and treatment response to mega-HAART regimen in patients from the Frankfurt HIV cohort. Antiviral Therapy2000; 5: 49–55.
6.
DeGruttolaV., DixL., D'AquilaR., HolderD., PhillipsA., Ait-KhaledM., BaxterJ., ClevenberghP., HammerS., HarriganR., KatzensteinD., LanierR., MillerM., ParaM., YerlyS., ZolopaA., MurrayJ., PatickA., MillerV., CastilloS., PedneaultL., & MellorsJ.The relation between baseline HIV drug resistance and response to antiretroviral therapy: re-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies using a standardized data analysis plan. Antiviral Therapy2000; 5: 41–48.
7.
ZolopaA.R., ShaferR.W., WarfordA., MontoyaJ.G., HsuP., KatzensteinD., MeriganT.C., & EfronB.HIV-1 genotypic resistance patterns predict response to saquinavir-ritonavir therapy in patients in whom previous protease inhibitor therapy had failed. Annals of Internal Medicine1999; 131: 813–821.
8.
CondraJ., HolderJ.J., SchleifW.A., BakshiK., DanovichR.M., GrahamD.J., ShivaprakashM., HolmesK., SaahA.J., LeavittR.Y., ChodakewitzJ.A., & EminiE.A.Genetic correlates of virological response to an indinavir-containing salvage regimen in patients with nelfinavir failure. Antiviral Therapy1999; 4: 44.
9.
BaxterJ.D., MayersD.L., WentworthD.N., NeatonJ.D., HooverM.L., WintersM.A., MannheimerS.B., ThompsonM.A., AbramsD.I., BrizzB.J., IoannidisJ.P.A., & MeriganT.C.A randomized study of antiretroviral management based on plasma genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in patients failing therapy. AIDS2000; 14: F83–F93.
10.
ClevenberghP., DurantJ., HalfonP., del GiudiceP., MondainV., MontagneN., SchapiroJ.M., BoucherC.A.B., & DellamonicaP.Persisting long-term benefit of genotype-guided treatment for HIV-infected patients failing HAART. The Viradapt study: week 48 follow-up. Antiviral Therapy2000; 5: 65–70.
11.
CohenC., HuntS., SensionM., FarthingC., ConantM., JacobsonS., NadlerJ., VerbiestW., HertogsK., AmesM., RinehartA., & GrahamN.Phenotypic resistance testing significantly improves response to therapy: a randomized trial (VIRA 3001).7th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. San Francisco, California, 30 Jan–2 Feb 2000, Abstract 237.
12.
MurphyR.L., BrunS., HicksC., EronJ.T., GulickR., KingM., WhiteA.C., BensonC., ThompsonM., KesslerH.A., HammerS., BertzR., HsuA., JapourA., & SunE.ABT-378/ritonavir plus stavudine and lamivudine for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48-week results. AIDS2001; 15: F1–F9.
13.
BensonC.A., DeeksS., BrunS.C., GulickR., EronJ.J., KesslerH.A., MurphyR.L., HicksC., KingM., WheelerD., FeinbergJ., StrykerR., SaxP., RiddlerS., ThompsonM., RealK., HsuA., KempfD., JapourA., & SunE.48 Week safety and antiviral activity of lopinavir/ritonavir plus nevirapine and two nucleoside analogs in human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor-experienced patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases2002; 185: 599–607.
14.
MollaA., VasavanondaS., KumarG., ShamH.L., JohnsonM., GrabowskiB., DenissenJ.F., KohlbrennerW., PlattnerJ.J., LeonardJ.M., NorbeckD.W., & KempfD.J.Human serum attenuates the activity of protease inhibitors toward wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus. Virology1998; 250: 255–262.
15.
KempfD.J., IsaacsonJ.D., KingM.S., BrunS.C., XuY., RealK., BernsteinB.M., JapourA.J., SunE., & RodeR.A.Identification of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus protease that correlate with reduced susceptibility to the protease inhibitor lopinavir among viral isolates from protease inhibitor-experienced patients. Journal of Virology2001; 75: 7462–7469.
16.
PetropoulosC.J., ParkinN.T., LimoliK.L., LieY.S., WrinT., HuangW., TianH., SmithD., WinslowG.A., CaponD.J., & WhitcombJ.M.A novel phenotypic drug susceptibility assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy2000; 44: 920–928.
17.
MantelN.Assessing laboratory evidence for neoplastic activity. Biometrics1980; 36: 381–399.
18.
TukeyJ.W., CimineraJ.L., & HeyseJ.F.Testing the statistical certainty of a response to increasing doses of a drug. Biometrics1985; 41: 295–301.
19.
HirschM.S., Brun-VezinetF., D'AquilaR.T., HammerS.M., JohnsonV.A., KuritzkesD.R., LovedayC., MellorsJ.W., ClotetB., ConwayB., DemeterL.M., VellaS., JacobsenD.M., & RichmanD.D.Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection - Recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel. Journal of the American Medical Association2000; 283: 2417–2426.
20.
BertzR., LamW., HsuA., GrannemanG.R., & SunE.Effects of gender, race, age and weight on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir after single-dose Kaletra. 2nd International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy. Noordwijk, the Netherlands, 2–4 April 2001, Abstract 3,11.
21.
KakudaT.N., PageL.M., AndersonP.L., HenryK., SchackerT.W., RhameF.S., AcostaE.P., BrundageR.C., & FletcherC.V.Pharmacological basis for concentration-controlled therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy2001; 45: 236–242.
22.
DurantJ., ClevenberghP., GarraffoR., HalfonP., IcardS., Del GiudiceP., MontagneN., SchapiroJ.M., & DellamonicaP.Importance of protease inhibitor plasma levels in HIV-infected patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy: pharmacological data from the Viradapt Study. AIDS1333; 14: 1333–1339.
23.
KempfD., HsuA., JiangP., RodeR., HertogsK., LarderB., ZolopaA., ShulmanN., HavlirD., GallantJ., RaceE., BollerS., SwerdlowJ., JasinskyO., RenzC., & SunE.Response to ritonavir (RTV) intensification in indinavir (IDV) recipients is highly correlated with virtual inhibitory quotient.8th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, Illinois, 4–8 February, 2001, Abstract 523.
ParkinN.T., ChappeyC., MarantaM., WhitehurstN., & PetropoulosC.J.Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of a large database of patient samples reveals distinct patterns of protease inhibitor cross-resistance. Antiviral Therapy2001; 6: 49.
26.
RuaneP., MendoncaJ., TimermanA., CernohousP., BauerE., BernsteinB., & SunE.Kaletra vs. nelfinavir in antiretro-viral-naive subjects: week 60 comparison in a phase III, blinded, randomized clinical trial.1st IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 8–11 July 2001, Abstract 6.
27.
KempfD., BernsteinB., KingM., CernohousP., MoseleyJ., GuK., BauerE., & SunE.Comparison of the emergence of genotypic resistance over 60 weeks of therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) or nelfinavir plus d4T/3TC.1st IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 8–11 July 2001, Abstract 129.