This article argues for the importance of understanding storytelling as a socio-material practice growing from engagements with the environment and its constituents. Based on an ethnography of guided tours on Svalbard, the article reveals how storytelling arises from encounters and engagements with particular constituents of the environment, such as terrain or ice, as well as from bodily experiences such as walking, feeling, touching, looking or (not) hearing. The practice of storytelling then shifts looking at and receiving information about something to seeing and knowing it through embodied experience – a shift that is, however, limited by incommensurable temporalities of diverse constituents of the environment. Storytelling as a practice thus contains not only verbal information about miners or (glacier) ice but also arises from and shapes the ways of being with (constituents of) the environment, knowing them and seeing them. Consequentially, relations between the tour group and the terrain, ice or weather elements that are emerging, are all a configurative part of the socio-material practice of storytelling.
AbramSLienME (2011) Performing nature at world’s ends. Ethnos76(1): 3–18.
2.
AngeloH (2013) Bird in hand: How experience makes nature. Theory and Society42(4): 351–368.
3.
ArlovTB (2005) The discovery and early exploitation of Svalbard. Some historiographical notes. Acta Borealia22(1): 3–19.
4.
AvangoDHoultzA (2012) “The essence of the adventure”: Narratives of Arctic work and engineering in the early 20th century. In: HacquebordL (ed) LASHIPA: History of Large Scale Resource Exploitation in Polar Areas. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing, 87–105.
5.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter Comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–831.
6.
BaradKM (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
7.
BassoKH (1996) Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
8.
BergR (2013) From “Spitsbergen” to “Svalbard”. Norwegianization in Norway and in the “Norwegian sea”, 1820–1925. Acta Borealia30(2): 154–173.
9.
Brode-RogerD (2023) The Svalbard treaty and identity of place: Impacts and implications for Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Polar Record59: e6.
10.
BrunerEM (2005) Culture on Tour: Ethnographies of Travel. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
CosgroveD (1993) Landscapes and myths, gods and humans. In: BenderB (ed) Landscape Politics and Perspectives. Explorations in Anthropology. Providence: Berg, 281–305.
12.
CruikshankJ (2000) The Social Life of Stories: Narrative and Knowledge in the Yukon Territory. 1. Bison books print. Bison books. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
13.
FoucaultM (2010) The Archaeology of Knowledge. World of man. New York: Vintage Books.
14.
Government of Norway (2001) Svalbard Environmental Protection Act. LOV-2001-06-15-79. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/svalbard-environmental-protection-act/id173945/.
15.
HarawayDJ (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575.
16.
HarawayDJ (2008) When Species Meet. Posthumanities 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
HastrupK (2004) Getting it right: Knowledge and evidence in anthropology. Anthropological Theory4(4): 455–472.
18.
HollowayL (2007) Subjecting cows to robots: Farming technologies and the making of animal subjects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25(6): 1041–1060.
19.
IngoldT (1993) The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology25(2): 152–174.
20.
IngoldT (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling & Skill. London, New York: Routledge.
21.
KirkseySEHelmreichS (2010) The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology25(4): 545–576.
22.
KohnEO (2002) Natural engagements and ecological aesthetics among The Ávila Runa of Amazonian Ecuador. Dissertation thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
23.
KohnEO (2005) Runa realism: Upper Amazonian attitudes to nature knowing. Ethnos70(2): 171–196.
24.
KohnEO (2013) How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
KotaškováE (2022) From mining tool to tourist attraction: Cultural heritage as a materialised form of transformation in Svalbard society. Polar Record58: e19.
26.
KotaškováEJelínekM (2022) When I hear there’s going to be an Asian tourist …” The role of Asian ethnicity in the planning process of guided tours in Svalbard. In: Asian Mobilities Consumption in a Changing Arctic. Routledge advances in tourism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
27.
LawJ (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. International library of sociology. London; New York: Routledge.
28.
MaggioR (2014) The anthropology of storytelling and the storytelling of anthropology. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology5(2): 89–106.
29.
MaslenS (2020) Between narrative and practice: Storytelling as a way of knowing how to be in nature. Ethnography23(4): 433–449.
30.
MiddletonA (2023) Norwegian and Russian settlements on Svalbard: An analysis of demographic and socio-economic trends. Polar Record59: e14.
31.
NiewöhnerJ (2016) Co-Laborative anthropology: Crafting reflexivities experimentally. In: JouhkiJSteelT (eds) Etnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi: kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia.Ethnos-toimite. Helsinki: Suomen kansatieteilijöiden yhdistys Ethnos, pp. 81–125.
32.
NorumR (2016) Barentsburg and beyond: Coal, science, tourism, and the geopolitical imaginaries of Svalbard’s “new north”. In: HugganGJensenL (eds) Postcolonial perspectives on the European high north: Unscrambling the Arctic. Palgrave Pivot. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 31–65.
ØianH (2013) Wilderness tourism and the moralities of commitment: Hunting and angling as modes of engaging with the natures and animals of rural landscapes in Norway. Journal of Rural Studies32: 177–185.
35.
OkelyJ (2001) Visualism and landscape: Looking and seeing in Normandy. Ethnos66(1): 99–120.
36.
PinkS (2018) Refiguring Collaboration and Experimentation. In: Experimental collaborations: Ethnography through fieldwork devices. EASA series 34. New York: Berghahn.
37.
PolsJ (2014) Knowing patients: Turning patient knowledge into science. Science, Technology, & Human Values39(1): 73–97.
38.
RantalaOValtonenAMarkukselaV (2011) Materializing tourist weather: Ethnography on weather-wise wilderness guiding practices. Journal of Material Culture16(3): 285–300.
39.
RobertsPPagliaE (2016) Science as national belonging: The construction of Svalbard as a Norwegian space. Social Studies of Science46(6): 894–911.
40.
SalazarNB (2010) Envisioning Eden: Mobilizing imaginaries in tourism and beyond. New directions in anthropology v. 31. New York: Berghahn Books.
41.
WacquantL (2005) Carnal connections: On embodiment, apprenticeship, and membership. Qualitative Sociology28(4): 445–474.
42.
WråkbergU (2019) A. E. Nordenskiöld in Swedish memory: The origin and uses of Arctic heroism. Acta Borealia36(2): 166–182.
