This article investigates how material objects fit into societal discourses of remembering; the authors focus on how the spatial and material composition of objects can affect subjects, thus suggesting particular meanings and engagements. In particular, they investigate war memorials as cultural objects and products of social discourses, but emphasize that the memorials are not reducible to these discourses. Rather, the materials used in the creation of war memorials as well as their holistic organization constitute vital aspects of the memorial site and its ability to engage individuals and groups in socially desirable and personally meaningful processes. The authors analyze the Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans Memorial, taking into account the holistic material organization, hyper-generalization of signs, symbolic functions, and social suggestions that the memorial provides for visitors passing through. They argue that, partially through its very materiality, the memorial guides the direction of viewers’ affective response, leading to particular interpretations and reactions.
Alexander JC ( 2008) Iconic consciousness: the material feeling of meaning . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26(5): 782-794.
2.
Barber B. ( 1949) Place, symbol, and utilitarian function in war memorials . Social Forces28(1): 64-68.
3.
Bartlett FC ( 1961) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Basso K. ( 1996) Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
5.
Beckstead Z. ( 2009) Symbolic journeys and the formation of affective fields . Paper presented at Clark University Research Conference, May, Worcester, MA.
6.
Bender B. ( 1993) Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
7.
Boesch E. ( 1991) Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Boivin N. ( 2008) Material Cultures, Material Minds: The Impact of Things on Human Thought, Society, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Brockmeier J. ( 2002) Remembering and forgetting: narrative as cultural memory . Culture & Psychology8(1): 15-43.
10.
Carney LS ( 1993) Not telling us what to think: the Vietnam Veterans Memorial . Metaphor and Symbolic Activity8(3): 211-219.
11.
Foss SJ ( 1986) Ambiguity as persuasion: the Vietnam Veterans Memorial . Communication Quarterly34(3): 326-340.
12.
Grissom C. and Harvey R. ( 2003) The conservation of American war memorials made of zinc . Journal of the American Institute for Conservation42(1): 21-38.
13.
Halbwachs M. ( 1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Johnson N. ( 2002) Mapping monuments: the shaping of public space and cultural identities. Visual Communication1(3): 293-298.
15.
Josephs I. ( 2000) Feeling as movement from a person-centered standpoint: going beyond William Stern. Theory and Psychology10(6): 815-829.
16.
Josephs I. and Valsiner J. ( 1998) How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly61: 68-83.
17.
Latour B. ( 1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
18.
Latour B. ( 2008) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Macdonald S. ( 2006) Words in stone? Agency and identity in a Nazi landscape . Journal of Material Culture11(1/2): 105-126.
20.
McKim J. ( 2008) Agamben at Ground Zero: a memorial without content. Theory , Culture & Society25(5): 83-103.
21.
Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans Memorial (2009 ) A long time coming. Available at: http://www.massvvm.org/
22.
Middleton D. and Brown SD ( 2007) Making memory matter. In: Valsiner J, Rosa A (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 661-677.
23.
Miller D. ( 2005[1998]) Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Nelson J. ( 2003) Social memory as ritual practice: commemorating spirits of the military dead at Yasukuni Shinto shrine. Journal of Asian Studies62(2): 443-467.
25.
Nora P. ( 1989) Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire . Representations26(1): 7-25.
26.
Olsen B. ( 2003) Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archeological Review2(36): 87-104.
27.
Shweder R. ( 1995) Cultural psychology: what is it? In: Goldberger N, Veroff J (eds) The Culture and Psychology Reader. New York: New York University Press, 41-86.
28.
Tilley C. ( 1997) A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford : Berg.
29.
Tilley C. ( 2004) The Materiality of Stone: Explorations of Landscape Phenomenology . Oxford: Berg.
30.
Valsiner J. ( 2000) Culture and Human Development. London : Sage.
31.
Valsiner J. ( 2006) The overwhelming world: functions of pleromatization in creating diversity in cultural and natural constructions. Paper presented at the International Summer School of Semiotic and Structural Studies, Imatra, Finland, 12 June.
32.
Valsiner J. ( 2007) Culture in Minds and Societies. London : Sage.
33.
Vietnam Veterans Home Page (2009) Vietnam Veterans Memorials around the World. Available at: http://www.vietvet.org/vietmems.htm
34.
Wagner R. and Schwartz B. ( 1991) The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: commemorating a difficult past. American Journal of Sociology97(2): 376-420.
35.
Webmoor T. and Witmore C. ( 2008) Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeology Review41(1): 531-570.
36.
Wertsch J. ( 2007) Collective memory. In: Valsiner J, Rosa A (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 645-660.
