This study aimed to adapt and validate the Reward-Based Eating Drive Scale (RED-13) for Brazilian Portuguese and assess its psychometric properties and predictive validity. The adaptation process followed established cross-cultural guidelines, including translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index. A total of 452 adults aged 18–59 years, recruited online, participated in the psychometric assessment. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the scale’s three-dimensional structure (RMSEA < 0.0001, SRMR = 0.041, TLI = 1.000, CFI = 1.000). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.921, ω = 0.922). RED-13 BR scores showed moderate correlations with food cravings and weak correlations with body mass index (rho = 0.266, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated predictive ability for pre-obesity and obesity. These findings suggest that the RED-13 BR is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing reward-based eating behavior in Brazilian adults.
AnnesiJJ (2022) Behavioral weight loss and maintenance: A 25-year research program informing innovative programming. Permanente Journal26(2): 98–117.
2.
BeatonDBombardierCGuilleminF, et al. (2007) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. Report. Toronto, ON: Institute for Work & Health.
3.
Bernat-VillenaAPérez-CominoFJBecerra-LosadaM, et al. (2025) Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and inhibitory control training for excess weight treatment: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (InhibE). BMC Psychology13(1): 225.
4.
BerthoudHR (2012) The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society71(4): 478–487.
5.
BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1): 3–5.
6.
DaltonMFinlaysonGHillA, et al. (2015) Preliminary validation and principal components analysis of the control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) for the experience of food craving. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition69: 1313–1317.
7.
DavisC (2013) Compulsive overeating as an addictive behavior: Overlap between food addiction and binge eating disorder. Current Obesity Reports2: 171–178.
8.
DavisLL (1992) Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research5(4): 194–197.
9.
EpelESTomiyamaAJMasonAE, et al. (2014) The reward-based eating drive scale: A self-report index of reward-based eating. PLoS One9(6): e101350.
10.
GoodmanJKCryderCECheemaA (2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making26(3): 213–224.
11.
GrantJSDavisLL (1997) Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health20(3): 269–274.
12.
HerhausBBarlangMBerthH, et al. (2024) Factor structure and psychometric properties of the German version of the Reward-based Eating Drive scale. Research Square [Preprint]. Version 1, posted 24 October 2024. Available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5268393/v1 (accessed 01 December 2025).
13.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
14.
KesslerDA (2010) The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite. Rodale.
15.
Le MoalMKoobGF (2007) Drug addiction: Pathways to the disease and pathophysiological perspectives. European Neuropsychopharmacology17(6–7): 377–393.
16.
LucasREDienerEGrobA, et al. (2000) Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(3): 452–468.
17.
MacLeanPSRothmanAJNicastroHL, et al. (2018) The accumulating data to optimally predict obesity treatment (ADOPT) core measures project: Rationale and approach. Obesity 26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S6–S15.
18.
MasonAEEpelESAschbacherK, et al. (2016) Reduced reward-driven eating accounts for the impact of a mindfulness-based diet and exercise intervention on weight loss: Data from the SHINE randomized controlled trial. Appetite100: 86–93.
19.
MasonAEVainikUAcreeM, et al. (2017) Improving assessment of the spectrum of reward-related eating: The RED-13. Frontiers in Psychology8: 795.
20.
Mietus-SnyderMLLustigRH (2008) Childhood obesity: Adrift in the “limbic triangle”. Annual Review of Medicine59: 147–162.
21.
Rivera-IñiguezIPanduroAVillaseñor-BayardoSJ, et al. (2022) Influence of a nutrigenetic intervention on self-efficacy, emotions, and rewarding behaviors in unhealthy eating among Mexicans: An exploratory pilot study. Nutrients14(1): 213.
22.
SchistermanEFPerkinsNJLiuA, et al. (2005) Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology16(1): 73–81.
23.
Solier-LópezLGonzález-GonzálezRCaracuelA, et al. (2022) A program for the comprehensive cognitive training of excess weight (TRAINEP): The study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(14): 8447.
24.
SutinARBoutelleKCzajkowskiSM, et al. (2018) Accumulating data to optimally predict obesity treatment (ADOPT) core measures: Psychosocial domain. Obesity 26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S45–S54.
25.
SuttonCAL’InsalataAMFazzinoTL (2022) Reward sensitivity, eating behavior, and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review. Physiology & Behavior252: 113843.
26.
TerweeCBBotSDde BoerMR, et al. (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology60(1): 34–42.
27.
ÜnalGAçarYKabalıS, et al. (2025) Relationship between mindful eating, hedonic hunger, and obesity. Revista de Nutrição38: e230200.
28.
VainikUGarcía-GarcíaIDagherA (2019a) Uncontrolled eating: A unifying heritable trait linked with obesity, overeating, personality and the brain. European Journal of Neuroscience50(3): 2430–2445.
29.
VainikUEun HanJEpelES, et al. (2019b) Rapid assessment of reward-related eating: The RED-X5. Obesity27(2): 325–331.
30.
van DillenSMvan BinsbergenJJKoelenMA, et al. (2013) Nutrition and physical activity guidance practices in general practice: A critical review. Patient Education and Counseling90(2): 155–169.
31.
VisscherTLVietALKroesbergenIH, et al. (2006) Underreporting of BMI in adults and its effect on obesity prevalence estimations in the period 1998 to 2001. Obesity14(11): 2054–2063.
32.
VolkowNDWangGJTomasiD, et al. (2013) The addictive dimensionality of obesity. Biological Psychiatry73(9): 811–818.
33.
World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic: Report of a WHO consultation. Report. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42330 (accessed 01 December 2025).
34.
WyndCASchmidtBSchaeferMA (2003) Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research25(5): 508–518.
35.
YavuzAYAltinsoyCToramanMN, et al. (2025) The Turkish validity and reliability of the reward-based eating drive (RED-13) scale. PLoS One20(4): e0322097.
