This paper reports two prospective studies using psychological network analysis to explore how couples adapt to cardiovascular disease. Study 1 examined the relationships among three illness perceptions (i.e., illness acceptance, helplessness, and benefit-finding) and symptoms of anxiety and depression in 75 couples. Study 2 examined the interconnections among three other illness perceptions (i.e., personal control, treatment control, and illness consequences) and physical and psychological well-being in 104 couples. The findings show that patient and partner illness perceptions are strongly interrelated, while patient and partner well-being are also closely connected. Patient and spouse illness perceptions were linked to well-being through a rich network of direct and indirect connections. Central variables involved a sense of control and the emotional impact of illness. The findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of dyadic adaptation to illness and identify key factors/processes that could support improved adaptation for both patients and their partners.
ApplebaumAJBreitbartW (2013) Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review. Palliative & Supportive Care11(3): 231–252.
2.
AugustKJRookKSStephensMA, et al. (2011) Are spouses of chronically ill partners burdened by exerting health-related social control?Journal of Health Psychology16(7): 1109–1119.
3.
BaandersANHeijmansMJ (2007) The impact of chronic diseases. The partner’s perspective. Family & Community Health30(4): 305–317.
4.
BarabásiAL (2016) Network Science. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BenyaminiYGozlanMKokiaE (2009) Women’s and men’s perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: A dyadic approach. British Journal of Health Psychology14(1): 1–16.
6.
BergCAUpchurchR (2007) A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin133(6): 920–954.
7.
BertoniADonatoSGraffignaG, et al. (2015) Engaged patients, engaged partnerships: Singles and partners dealing with an acute cardiac event. Psychology Health & Medicine20(5): 505–517.
8.
BertschiICMeierFBodenmannG (2021) Disability as an interpersonal experience: A systematic review on dyadic challenges and dyadic coping when one partner has a chronic physical or sensory impairment. Frontiers in Psychology12: 624609.
9.
BodenmannG (2005) Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: RevensonTAAyserKBodenmannKG (eds) Couples Coping With Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. American Psychological Association, pp.33–50.
10.
BouchardKGareauAGallantNL, et al. (2021) Dyadic effects of anxiety and depression on quality of life among couples facing cardiovascular disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research149: 110601.
11.
BowenCMacLehoseABeaumontJG (2011) Advanced multiple sclerosis and the psychosocial impact on families. Psychology and Health26(1): 113–127.
12.
BringmannLFElmerTEpskampS, et al. (2019) What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?Journal of Abnormal Psychology128(8): 892–903.
13.
DekelRVilchinskyNLibermanG, et al. (2014) Marital satisfaction and depression among couples following men’s acute coronary syndrome: Testing dyadic dynamics in a longitudinal design. British Journal of Health Psychology19(2): 347–362.
14.
DimitrakiGKarademasEC (2014) The association of type 2 diabetes patient and spouse illness representations with their well-being: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine21(2): 230–239.
15.
DimitrakiGPapastefanakisEKtistakiG, et al. (2023) The relation of partners’ illness representations to the coping behaviors of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases through patients’ illness representation: A dyadic regulation process. Current Psychology42: 16923–16931.
16.
ElliottTRShewchukRM (2005) Family adaptation in illness, disease, and disability. In: BollTRaczynskiJMLevitonLC (eds) Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology, vol. 2. American Psychological Association, pp.379–403.
17.
EpskampSBorsboomDFriedEI (2018) Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods50(1): 195–212.
18.
EversAWKraaimaatFWvan LankveldW, et al. (2001) Beyond unfavorable thinking: The illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology69(6): 1026–1036.
19.
FalconierMKKuhnR (2019) Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology10: 571.
20.
FoygelRDrtonM (2010) Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 23: 24th annual conference on neural information processing systems, NIPS, 2010.
21.
FranksMMLucasTStephensMAP, et al. (2010) Diabetes distress and depressive symptoms: A dyadic investigation of older patients and their spouses. Family Relations59(5): 599–610.
22.
FrenchDPCooperAWeinmanJ (2006) Illness perceptions predict attendance at cardiac rehabilitation following acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research61(6): 757–767.
23.
FruchtermanTMJReingoldEM (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software Practice and Experience21(11): 1129–1164.
24.
GiannousiZKarademasECDimitrakiG (2016) Illness representations and psychological adjustment of Greek couples dealing with a recently-diagnosed cancer: Dyadic, interaction and perception-dissimilarity effects. Journal of Behavioral Medicine39(1): 85–93.
25.
GiannousiZThomadakisCKarademasEC, et al. (2023) The dyadic regulation approach of coping and illness representations in female cancer patients and their partners. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1194900.
26.
GrecoAStecaPPozziR, et al. (2015) The influence of illness severity on health satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular disease: The mediating role of illness perception and self-efficacy beliefs. Behavioral Medicine41(1): 9–17.
27.
GuanTChapmanMVde Saxe ZerdenL, et al. (2023) Illness uncertainty and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis. Psycho-oncology32(11): 1744–1751.
28.
HagedoornMDaganMPutermanE, et al. (2011) Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: The interplay of past and current spousal support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine34(4): 288–297.
29.
HaggerMSKochSChatzisarantisNLD, et al. (2017) The common sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychological Bulletin143(11): 1117–1154.
30.
HelgesonVSReynoldsKATomichPL (2006) A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology74(5): 797–816.
31.
HeveyD (2018) Network analysis: A brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine6(1): 301–328.
32.
HickmanRLJrDouglasSL (2010) Impact of chronic critical illness on the psychological outcomes of family members. AACN Advanced Critical Care21(1): 80–91.
33.
JohnsonMDAndersonJRWalkerA, et al. (2015) Spousal overprotection is indirectly associated with poorer dietary adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes via diabetes distress when active engagement is low. British Journal of Health Psychology20(2): 360–373.
34.
JonesPJMaRMcNallyRJ (2021) Bridge centrality: A network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behavioral Research56(2): 353–367.
35.
KarademasEC (2014) The psychological well-being of couples experiencing a chronic illness: A matter of personal and partner illness cognitions and the role of marital quality. Journal of Health Psychology19(11): 1347–1357.
36.
KarademasECBarouxiEMavroeidesG (2019a) Positive and negative affect and well-being in cardiac patients and their spouses: The mediating role of illness representations. Psychology and Health34(3): 289–305.
37.
KarademasEC (2022) A new perspective on dyadic regulation in chronic illness: The dyadic regulation connectivity model. Health Psychology Review16(1): 1–21.
38.
KarademasECDimitrakiGThomadakisC, et al. (2019b) The relation of spouse illness representations to patient representations and coping behavior: A study in couples dealing with a newly diagnosed cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology37(2): 145–159.
39.
KellerJWiedemannAUHohlDH, et al. (2017) Predictors of dyadic planning: Perspectives of prostate cancer survivors and their partners. British Journal of Health Psychology22(1): 42–59.
40.
LeventhalHMeyerDNerenzD (1980) The common-sense representations of illness danger. In: RachmanS (ed.) Medical Psychology, vol. 2. Pergamon, pp.7–30.
41.
LeventhalHPhillipsLABurnsE (2016) The common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM): A dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. Journal of Behavioral Medicine39(6): 935–946.
42.
LinglerJHTerhorstLSchulzR, et al. (2016) Dyadic analysis of illness perceptions among persons with mild cognitive impairment and their family members. Gerontologist56(5): 886–895.
43.
Moss-MorrisRWeinmanJPetrieKJ, et al. (2002) The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology and Health17(1): 1–16.
44.
MystakidouKTsilikaEParpaE, et al. (2004) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Greek cancer patients: psychometric analyses and applicability. Supportive Care in Cancer12(12): 821–825.
OttoAKLaurenceauJPSiegelSD, et al. (2015) Capitalizing on everyday positive events uniquely predicts daily intimacy and well-being in couples coping with breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology29(1): 69–79.
47.
PaschaliAPalliAThomadakisC, et al. (2021) The interplay between individual and dyadic/common coping in female patients with cancer. European Journal of Psychology Open80(4): 143–151.
48.
PedersenSSvon KänelRTullyPJ, et al. (2017) Psychosocial perspectives in cardiovascular disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology24(3_suppl): 108–115.
49.
RandallGMolloyGJSteptoeA (2009) The impact of an acute cardiac event on the partners of patients: A systematic review. Health Psychology Review3(1): 1–84.
50.
RothGAMensahGAJohnsonCO, et al. (2020) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: Update from the GBD 2019 Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology76(25): 2982–3021.
51.
RottmannNHansenDGLarsenPV, et al. (2015) Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology34(5): 486–495.
52.
SeligmanME (1978) Learned helplessness as a model of depression. Comment and integration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology87(1): 165–179.
53.
TaylorECO’NeillMHughesLD, et al. (2022) Atrial fibrillation, quality of life and distress: A cluster analysis of cognitive and behavioural responses. Quality of Life Research31(5): 1415–1425.
54.
TsaiTCMitchellHRZeitzerJ, et al. (2024) Dyadic investigation of posttraumatic stress symptoms and daily sleep health in patients with cancer and their caregivers. Psychosomatic Medicine86(4): 234–243.
55.
VerhoofEJMaurice-StamHHeymansHS, et al. (2014) Psychosocial well-being in young adults with chronic illness since childhood: The role of illness cognitions. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health8: 12.
56.
VilchinskyNDekelRLeibowitzM, et al. (2011) Dynamics of support perceptions among couples coping with cardiac illness: The effect on recovery outcomes. Health Psychology30(4): 411–419.
57.
WeinmanJHeijmansMFigueirasMJ (2003) Carer perceptions of chronic illness. In: CameronLDLeventhalH (eds) The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour. Routledge, pp.207–219.
58.
WeitkampKFegerFLandoltSA, et al. (2021) Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology12: 722740.
59.
World Heart Federation (2023) World Heart Report 2023: Confronting the World’s Number One Killer. World Heart Federation.
60.
ZajdelMHelgesonVS (2020) Communal coping: A multi-method approach with links to relationships and health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships37(5): 1700–1721.
61.
ZhaoMZhaoJChenJ, et al. (2022) The relationship between medication adherence and illness perception in breast cancer patients with adjuvant endocrine therapy: Beliefs about medicines as mediators. Supportive Care in Cancer30(12): 10009–10017.
62.
ZigmondASSnaithRP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica67(6): 361–370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
