The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and time poverty remains poorly understood, particularly how financial and temporal resources jointly shape outcomes. Drawing on data from 9830 participants in the 2020 China Family Panel Studies, this study used latent profile analysis to identify SES-time usage profiles and examine differences in health and well-being outcomes. Four distinct subgroups emerged: Low Income-Short Working Hours (Income Poverty, 12.0%), Middle Income-Long Working Hours (Time Poverty, 41.7%), Low Income-Long Working Hours (Double Poverty, 4.5%), and High Income-Appropriate Working Hours (Balance, 41.9%). Results revealed systematic differences across profiles. The Balance group consistently exhibited optimal outcomes across almost all measured domains, while the Double Poverty group demonstrated the worst. Notably, temporal scarcity may be more detrimental to well-being than financial resources for individuals who have overcome absolute economic poverty. These findings clarify the interplay between socioeconomic resources and time allocation, providing evidence for targeted interventions to enhance well-being.
AdedejiAOlonisakinTTBuchcikJ, et al. (2023) Socioeconomic status and social capital as predictors of happiness: Evidence and gender differences. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): 119.
2.
AdjeiNKBrandT (2018) Investigating the associations between productive housework activities, sleep hours and self-reported health among elderly men and women in western industrialised countries. BMC Public Health18(1): 110.
ArtazcozLCortès-FranchIArcasMM, et al. (2024) Time poverty, health and health-related behaviours in a Southern European city: A gender issue. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health78(5): 284–289.
5.
AsD (1978) Studies of time-use: Problems and prospects. Acta Sociologica21(2): 125–141.
6.
AsparouhovTMuthenB (2021) Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Using the BCH Method in Mplus to Estimate a Distal Outcome Model and an Arbitrary Secondary Model. Mplus Web Notes No. 21. Available at: https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf (accessed 26 September 2025).
7.
BannaiATamakoshiA (2014) The association between long working hours and health: A systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health40(1): 5–18.
8.
BardasiEWodonQ (2006) Measuring time poverty and analyzing its determinants: Concepts and application to Guinea. In: BlackdenMWodonQ (eds) Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank, pp.75–95.
9.
BurtonL (2007) Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: A conceptual model. Family Relations56(4): 329–345.
10.
CaiJStoyanovA (2023) Progressive income tax and comparative advantage in trade. Economic Modelling129: 106553.
11.
Castro-SchiloLFerrerEHernándezMM, et al. (2016) Developmental outcomes of school attachment among students of Mexican origin. Journal of Research on Adolescence26(4): 753–768.
12.
ChaS (2013) Time, money and health promoting behavior of aged men: Looking through the lens of capability theory. Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review17(2): 173–194.
13.
CollinsLMLanzaST (2009) Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
14.
DeSantisSMHousemanEACoullBA, et al. (2008) A penalized latent class model for ordinal data. Biostatistics9(2): 249–262.
15.
DoddsCColmanR (2001) Income Distribution in Nova Scotia. GPI Atlantic.
16.
DoraJPiccirilloMFosterKT, et al. (2023) The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data. Psychological Bulletin149(1-2): 1–24.
17.
DuttAK (2011) The dependence effect, consumption and happiness: Galbraith Revisited. In: PressmanS (ed.) The Legacy of John Kenneth Galbraith. Routledge, pp.53–76.
18.
FujishiroKXuJGongF (2010) What does “occupation” represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: Exploring occupational prestige and health. Social Science & Medicine71(12): 2100–2107.
19.
GaoYGanTJiangL, et al. (2019) Dose-response relationship between working hours and obesity risk. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine36(11): 989–994.
GiurgeLMWhillansAVWestC (2020) Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations. Nature Human Behaviour4(10): 993–1003.
22.
HelliwellJLayardRSachsJ (2017) World Happiness Report 2017. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
23.
HershfieldHEMogilnerCBarneaU (2016) People who choose time over money are happier. Social Psychological and Personality Science7(7): 697–706.
24.
HowardMCHoffmanME (2018) Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods21(4): 846–876.
25.
HuSMuZ (2021) Extended gender inequality? Intergenerational coresidence and division of household labor. Social Science Research93: 102497.
26.
HydeEGreeneMEDarmstadtGL (2020) Time poverty: Obstacle to women’s human rights, health and sustainable development. Journal of Global Health10(2): 020313.
27.
KaracaACaglarECinemreŞ (2009) Physical activity levels of the young adults in an economically developing country: The Turkish sample. Journal of Human Kinetics22: 91–98.
28.
KhedVDKrishnaVV (2023) Agency and time poverty: Linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India. World Development Perspectives29: 100484.
29.
KimTLeeSSY (2024) Double poverty: Class, employment type, gender and time poor precarious workers in the South Korean service economy. Journal of Contemporary Asia54(3): 412–431.
30.
KrausMWStephensNM (2012) A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass6(9): 642–656.
31.
Leon-PerezJMNotelaersGArenasA, et al. (2014) Identifying victims of workplace bullying by integrating traditional estimation approaches into a latent class cluster model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence29(7): 1155–1177.
32.
LingBYaoQDongB (2025) A latent profile analysis of TikTok use motives: Structure, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology19: 18344909251370778.
33.
LiuLMacPhailFDongXY (2018) Gender, work burden, and mental health in post-reform China. Feminist Economics24(2): 194–217.
34.
LiYMutchlerJE (2022) Poverty and self-rated health in later life: The mediating role of material hardship. Social Science Quarterly103(3): 521–533.
35.
LubkeGHMuthénB (2005) Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods10(1): 21–39.
36.
MaJChenYMengM, et al. (2025) Short-term dynamic changes in mental well-being under stress: Exploring trajectories with latent growth model analysis. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology19: 18344909251352771.
37.
MarmaraJAHoskingWMcLeanSA (2025) Examining associations between body appreciation and positive well-being among young adults: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Health Psychology30: 3681–3697.
38.
MasudaYJWilliamsJRTallisH (2021) Does Life satisfaction vary with time and income? Investigating the relationship among free time, income, and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies22(5): 2051–2073.
39.
McCannSJ (2025) US state death rates: Structural equation modeling of big five personality, socioeconomic status, and health risk factors. Journal of Health Psychology30(11): 3153–3168.
40.
MessengerJ (2018) Working Time and the Future of Work. International Labour Office.
41.
MogilnerC (2010) The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science21(9): 1348–1354.
42.
MongaAMayFBagchiR (2017) Eliciting time versus money: Time scarcity underlies asymmetric wage rates. Journal of Consumer Research44(4): 833–852.
43.
MubeenHRashidiMZ (2014) Impact of long working hours on job satisfaction of employees working in services sector of Karachi. Journal of Business Strategies8(1): 21–37.
44.
MullainathanSShafirE (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. Henry Holt and Company.
NamCBBoydM (2004) Occupational status in 2000; over a century of census-based measurement. Population Research and Policy Review23(4): 327–358.
47.
NoguchiTSuzukiSNishiyamaT, et al. (2022) Associations between work-related factors and happiness among working older adults: A cross-sectional study. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research26(3): 256–263.
48.
NohMJKimJS (2010) Factors influencing the user acceptance of digital home services. Telecommunications Policy34(11): 672–682.
49.
Nylund-GibsonKGarberACSinghJ, et al. (2023) The utility of latent class analysis to understand heterogeneity in youth coping strategies: A methodological introduction. Behavioral Disorders48(2): 106–120.
50.
OakesJMKaufmanJS (2017) Methods in Social Epidemiology. John Wiley & Sons.
51.
OECD (2024) OECD Employment Outlook 2024. OECD Publishing.
52.
OhH (2017) Poverty of both time and income in householders. Social Welfare Policy44(1): 161–185.
53.
ÖneşUMemişEKızılırmakB (2013) Poverty and intra-household distribution of work time in Turkey: Analysis and some policy implications. Women’s Studies International Forum41: 55–64.
54.
RammohanIJainSSunS, et al. (2023) Latent polydrug use patterns and the provision of injection initiation assistance among people who inject drugs in three North American settings. Drug and Alcohol Review42(6): 1504–1516.
55.
RichardsonRANandiAJaswalS, et al. (2017) Are work demands associated with mental distress? Evidence from women in rural India. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology52(12): 1501–1511.
56.
RuddM (2019) Feeling short on time: Trends, consequences, and possible remedies. Current Opinion in Psychology26: 5–10.
57.
Schoppe-SullivanSJWangJYangJ, et al. (2023) Patterns of coparenting and young children’s social–emotional adjustment in low-income families. Child Development94(4): 874–888.
58.
SpurkDHirschiAWangM, et al. (2020) Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior120: 103445.
59.
Statistics Canada (2005) General Social Survey of Time Use: Overview of the Time Use of Canadians, 2005. Statistics Canada, Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12f0080x/12f0080x2006001-eng.pdf (accessed 26 September 2025).
60.
StrazdinsLWelshJKordaR, et al. (2016) Not all hours are equal: Could time be a social determinant of health?Sociology of Health & Illness38(1): 21–42.
61.
TranTQTranALPhamTM, et al. (2018) Local governance and occupational choice among young people: First evidence from Vietnam. Children and Youth Services Review86: 21–31.
62.
Tsinghua Academy of Social Sciences (2021) Research Report on Travel Platforms in China’s Tier 1 Cities in 2021. Available at: http://www.199it.com/archives/1246525.html (accessed 26 September 2025).
63.
UrakawaKWangWAlamM (2020) Empirical analysis of time poverty and health-related activities in Japan. Journal of Family and Economic Issues41(3): 520–529.
64.
VithanageHGDunusinghePM (2023) The association between time poverty and income poverty: The Case of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Economic Research10(2): 71–95.
65.
WangMHangesPJ (2011) Latent class procedures: Applications to Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods14(1): 24–31.
66.
WangW (2022) Toward an empirical analysis of income and time poverty in urban China. Journal of Asian and African Studies57(7): 1295–1309.
67.
WestSGFinchJFCurranPJ (1995) Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: HoyleRH (ed.) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage Publications, pp.56–75.
68.
WhillansA (2019) Time for happiness: Why the pursuit of money isn’t bringing you joy — And what will. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2019/01/time-for-happiness (accessed 26 September 2025).
69.
WhillansAVDunnEW (2019) Valuing time over money is associated with greater social connection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships36(8): 2549–2565.
70.
WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008) Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization.
71.
WilliamsJRMasudaYJTallisH (2016) A measure whose time has come: Formalizing time poverty. Social Indicators Research128(1): 265–283.
72.
World Health Organization (2019) Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. World Health Organization.
73.
XieYHuJ (2014) An Introduction to the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chinese Sociological Review47(1): 3–29.
74.
YanLLLiuKMatthewsKA, et al. (2003) Psychosocial factors and risk of hypertension: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Journal of the American Medical Association290(16): 2138–2148.
75.
YehHJ (2015) Job demands, job resources, and job satisfaction in East Asia. Social Indicators Research121(1): 47–60.
76.
YouJZhuYLiuS, et al. (2021) Socioeconomic disparities in psychological health: Testing the Reserve Capacity Model in a population-based sample of Chinese migrants. Journal of Health Psychology26(10): 1538–1548.
77.
ZhangQLiCSGoeringDD, et al. (2024) Fitting in a workgroup in unique ways: A latent profile analysis of perceived person–group fit characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology109(5): 779–794.
