We examined how multifactorial (MF) beliefs about health relate to beliefs regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genomics research including genetic discrimination, determinism, and essentialism, and to demographic characteristics. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of 351 sociodemographically diverse U.S. adults (59% female, 56% having vocational-technical training or less education, 31% with low subjective socioeconomic status, 79% with self-reported good to excellent health, 62% white, 21% Black/African American, 18% Asian or Indigenous, 26% Hispanic, and 33% younger than 35 years). Linear regressions indicated that stronger MF beliefs were associated with lower endorsement of genetic discrimination by health insurance companies and employers, and with lower endorsement of polygenism, a subscale of race-based genetic essentialism. Stronger MF beliefs were associated with stronger beliefs in genetic determinism. Demographic characteristics were unrelated to MF beliefs. The relationships between MF beliefs and genetic discrimination, determinism, and essentialism were more complicated than expected.
AllenCWatersEAHamiltonJG, et al. (2022) Multifactorial causal beliefs and colorectal cancer screening: A structural equation modeling investigation. Journal of Health Psychology27(11): 2463–2477.
2.
BaquetCRCommiskeyPDaniel MullinsC, et al. (2006) Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention30(1): 24–33.
3.
Benn TorresJ (2020) Anthropological perspectives on genomic data, genetic ancestry, and race. American Journal of Physical Anthropology171(S70): 74–86.
4.
BrewerLCHayesSNParkerMW, et al. (2014) African American women’s perceptions and attitudes regarding participation in medical research: The Mayo Clinic/The Links, Incorporated Partnership. Journal of Women’s Health23(8): 681–687.
5.
CampbellWKSedikidesC (1999) Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology3(1): 23–43.
6.
CarterCRMakiJAckermannN, et al. (2023) Inclusive recruitment strategies to maximize sociodemographic diversity among participants: A St. Louis Case Study. MDM Policy & Practice8(1): 23814683231183646.
7.
CollinsFSGreenEDGuttmacherAE, et al. (2003) A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature422(6934): 835–847.
8.
ConditCM (2019) Laypeople are strategic essentialists, not genetic essentialists. Hastings Center Report49(Suppl 1): S27–S37.
9.
Dar-NimrodIHeineSJ (2011) Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin137(5): 800–818.
10.
DolanDDLeeSS-JChoMK (2022) Three decades of ethical, legal, and social implications research: Looking back to chart a path forward. Cell Genomics2(7): 100150.
11.
DonovanBM (2021) Ending genetic essentialism through genetics education. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances3(1): 100058.
12.
DreyfussRCNelkinD (1992) The jurisprudence of genetics. Vanderbilt Law Review45(2): 313–348.
13.
El BoghdadyMEwalds-KvistBM (2023) Racial discrimination in surgery: A systematic review. Updates in Surgery75(4): 795–806.
14.
FatumoSChikoworeTChoudhuryA, et al. (2022) A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies. Nature Medicine28(2): 243–250.
15.
FerrucciLMCartmelBTurkmanYE, et al. (2011) Causal attribution among cancer survivors of the 10 most common cancers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology29(2): 121–140.
16.
FilutAAlvarezMCarnesM (2020) Discrimination toward physicians of color: A systematic review. Journal of the National Medical Association112(2): 117–140.
17.
GerickeNCarverRCastéraJ, et al. (2017) Exploring Relationships Among Belief in Genetic Determinism, Genetics Knowledge, and Social Factors. Science & Education26(10): 1223–1259.
18.
GulynLMYoussefF (2010) Attribution of blame for breast and lung cancers in women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology28(3): 291–301.
19.
HamiltonJGWatersEA (2018) How are multifactorial beliefs about the role of genetics and behavior in cancer causation associated with cancer risk cognitions and emotions in the US population?Psycho-Oncology27(2): 640–647.
20.
HeYMartinAR (2023) We need more-diverse biobanks to improve behavioural genetics. Nature Human Behaviour8(2): 197–200.
21.
HurleBCitrinTJenkinsJF, et al. (2013) What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genetics in Medicine15(8): 658–663.
22.
JangMVorderstrasseA (2019) Socioeconomic status and racial or ethnic differences in participation: Web-based survey. JMIR Research Protocols8(4): e11865.
KellerJ (2005) In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(4): 686–702.
25.
KendiIX (2016) Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. New York, NY: Bold Type Books.
26.
KhouryMJIademarcoMFRileyWT (2016) Precision public health for the era of precision medicine. American Journal of Preventive Medicine50(3): 398–401.
LeeKYReisHTRoggeRD (2020) Seeing the world in pink and blue: Developing and exploring a new measure of essentialistic thinking about gender. Sex Roles83(11–12): 685–705.
29.
MarlowLAVWallerJWardleJ (2010) Variation in blame attributions across different cancer types. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention19(7): 1799–1805.
30.
McBrideCMBirminghamWCKinneyAY (2015) Health psychology and translational genomic research: Bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions. American Psychologist70(2): 91–104.
31.
MeloniMMollTIssakaA, et al. (2022) A biosocial return to race? A cautionary view for the postgenomic era. American Journal of Human Biology34(7): e23742.
32.
MohsenH (2020) Race and genetics: Somber history, troubled present. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine93(1): 215–219.
33.
MullingsLTorresJBFuentesA, et al. (2021) The Biology of Racism. American Anthropologist123(3): 671–680.
34.
National Cancer Institute (2014) Health Information National Trends Survey (Office of Mangament and Budget Publication No. 0925-0538). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Instruments/HINTS_4_Cycle_2_English.pdf (accessed 30 October 2024).
National Institutes of Health (2020) All of Us Research Program. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://www.nih.gov/taxonomy/term/846/all (accessed 11 November 2024).
National Institutes of Health (n.d.) PAR-23-293: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) Research (R01 Clinical Trial Optional). Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-23-293.html (accessed 26 September 2024).
39.
Navarro-CarrilloGAlonso-FerresMMoyaM, et al. (2020) Socioeconomic status and psychological well-being: Revisiting the role of subjective socioeconomic status. Frontiers in Psychology11: 1303.
40.
O’NeillSCMcBrideCMAlfordSH, et al. (2010) Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: The impact of risk factors and disease attributions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine40(2): 127–137.
41.
ParrottRLSilkKJDillowMR, et al. (2005) Development and validation of tools to assess genetic discrimination and genetically based racism. Journal of the National Medical Association97(7): 980–990.
42.
RobertsSOBareket-ShavitCDollinsFA, et al. (2020) Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science15(6): 1295–1309.
43.
RothWDCôtéREastmondJ (2024) Bridging boundaries? The effect of genetic ancestry testing on ties across racial groups. Social Problems71(1): 180–202.
44.
RothWDYaylacıŞJaffeK, et al. (2020) Do genetic ancestry tests increase racial essentialism? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One15(1): e0227399.
45.
SabatelloMJuengstE (2019) Genomic essentialism: Its provenance and trajectory as an anticipatory ethical concern. Hastings Center Report49(Suppl 1): S10–S18.
46.
SandersonSCDiefenbachMAStreicherSA, et al. (2013) Genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs about obesity and associated diseases among ethnically diverse patients: A structured interview study. Public Health Genomics16(3): 83–93.
47.
SandersonSCWallerJHumphriesSE, et al. (2011) Public awareness of genetic influence on chronic disease risk: Are genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs compatible?Public Health Genomics14(4–5): 290–297.
48.
ScanlonJKWoffordLFairA, et al. (2021) Predictors of participation in clinical research. Nursing Research70(4): 289–297.
49.
SchwartzNKnauperBHipplerH-J, et al. (1991) Rating scales: Numeric values may Change the meaning of scale labels. The Public Opinion Quarterly55(4): 570–582.
50.
ShepperdJALipseyNPPachurT, et al. (2018) Understanding the cognitive and affective mechanisms that underlie proxy risk perceptions among caregivers of asthmatic children. Medical Decision Making38(5): 562–572.
51.
Soylu YalcinkayaNEstrada-VillaltaSAdamsG (2017) The (biological or cultural) essence of essentialism: Implications for policy support among dominant and subordinated groups. Frontiers in Psychology8: 900.
VitturiBKRahmaniADiniG, et al. (2022) Stigma, discrimination and disclosure of the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the workplace: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(15): 9452.
54.
WangCCoupsEJ (2010) Causal beliefs about obesity and associated health behaviors: Results from a population-based survey. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity7(1): 19.
55.
WangCMillerSMEglestonBL, et al. (2010) Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population. Cancer Causes & Control21(1): 99–107.
56.
WatersEAMuffJHamiltonJG (2014) Multifactorial beliefs about the role of genetics and behavior in common health conditions: prevalence and associations with participant characteristics and engagement in health behaviors. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics16(12): 913–921.
57.
WatersEAWheelerCHamiltonJG (2016) How are information seeking, scanning, and processing related to beliefs about the roles of genetics and behavior in cancer causation?Journal of Health Communication21(Suppl 2): 6–15.
58.
WilkersonI (2020) Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents, 1st edn. New York: Random House.
59.
YaylacıŞRothWDJaffeK (2021) Measuring racial essentialism in the genomic era: The genetic essentialism scale for race (GESR). Current Psychology40(8): 3794–3808.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
