The Experience of Embodiment Scale (EES) assesses the quality of positive and negative experiences of living in the body, addressing body connection and comfort, agency and functionality, attuned self care, bodily desires, and freedom from objectification. In Study 1 (399 women, 465 men; age range: 18–26 years; mean = 21.24 years), exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 6-dimensional factor structure among women and men. The Chinese EES demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (α = 0.94; ω = 0.95). In Study 2 (197 women; 214 men; age range: 18–26 years; mean = 21.49 years), confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 6-dimensional factor model of EES had adequate fit, and gender invariance was supported. In Study 3 (157 women, 172 men; age range: 18–27 years; mean = 21.52 years), test-retest reliability at a 6 weeks intervals was good among women (ICCs = 0.797–0.887) and men (ICCs = 0.772–0.868). The results showed that the Chinese EES is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the experience of embodiment of Chinese college students.
AvalosLTylkaTLWood-BarcalowN (2005) The Body Appreciation Scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image2: 285–297.
2.
BrownTA (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BeverleyKMMortonJMDonnaRW (2001) Body-Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment76: 90–106.
4.
CampagnaJ (2021) Exploring positive embodiment as a protective factor against negative impacts of social media use. Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
ChmielewskiJFBowmanCPTolmanDL (2020) Pathways to pleasure and protection: Exploring embodiment, desire, and entitlement to pleasure as predictors of black and white young women’s sexual agency. Psychology of Women Quarterly44: 307–322.
7.
ChmielewskiJFTolmanDLBowmanC (2018) Feminists do it better: The role of feminism in Black and White young women’s sexual subjectivity and Embodiment. In: Revealing young women’s sexual embodiment: Feminist frames for inquiry and intervention (ed. DTolman). Philadelphia, PA: Annual Convention of the Association for Women in Psychology.
8.
CiceroDCKernsJGMcCarthyDM (2010) The aberrant salience inventory: A new measure of psychosis proneness. Psychological Assessment22: 688–701.
CohenJ (ed.) (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
CsordasTJ (1994) Embodiment and Experience, the Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
12.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsenRJ, et al. (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49(1): 71–75.
13.
DuarteCPinto-GouveiaJFerreiraC, et al. (2015) Body image as a source of shame: A new measure for the assessment of the multifaceted nature of body image shame. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy22(6): 656–666.
14.
FabrigarLRWegenerDTMacCallumRC, et al. (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods4: 272–299.
15.
FairbumCGBeglinS (2008) Eating disorder examination questionnaire. In: FairbumCG (ed.) Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press, pp.309–313.
16.
FloraDBCurranPJ (2004) An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods9: 466–491.
17.
FloydFJWidamanKF (1995) Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment7: 286–299.
18.
GattarioKHFrisénATeallTL, et al. (2020) Embodiment: Cultural and gender differences and associations with life satisfaction. Body Image35: 1–10.
19.
GeorgeDMalleryP (eds) (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update, 4th edn.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
GuLChenJHuangY, et al. (2017) Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 in female patients with eating disorders. Chinese Mental Health Journal31: 350–355.
21.
HolmqvistGKFrisénATeallTL, et al. (2020) Embodiment: Cultural and gender differences and associations with life satisfaction. Body Image35, 1–10.
22.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6: 1–55.
23.
JinYXuSChenC, et al. (2022) Symptom association between social anxiety disorder, appearance anxiety, and eating disorders among Chinese university students: A network analysis to conceptualize comorbidity. Frontiers in Public Health10: 1044081.
24.
KaiserHF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 141–151.
25.
KangYQQianM (2013) Predictors of Drive for Thinness and Body Dissatisfaction in Female Students from a Medical College in Tianjin, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology21: 126–132.
26.
KlingJCounsellAFrisénA, et al. (2021) Translation and psychometric evaluation of the experience of embodiment scale in a Swedish community sample of young women and men. Body Image39: 259–265.
27.
LiCH (2016) Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods48(3): 936–949.
28.
LovibondPFLovibondSH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy33(3): 335–343.
29.
MaJWangKThompsonJK (2023) Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4) in college students. Body Image45: 172–182.
30.
MaJWangKTylkaTL (2022) Psychometric properties of a Mandarin Chinese version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 with residents from Chinese mainland. Body Image42: 110–119.
31.
MervisCBRoschE (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology32(1): 89–115.
32.
OsborneJWCostelloABKellowJT (2008) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. In: OsborneJW (ed.) Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, pp.205–213.
33.
PengSLLiYChenT (2023) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the aesthetic responsiveness assessment in college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology31(4): 879–882.
34.
PiranN (2016) Embodied possibilities and disruptions: The emergence of the experience of embodiment construct from qualitative studies with girls and women. Body Image18: 43–60.
35.
PiranN (2017) Journeys of Embodiment at the Intersection of Body and Culture: The Developmental Theory of Embodiment. London: Academic Press.
36.
PiranNTeallTL (2012) The Developmental Theory of Embodiment. Preventing Eating-Related and Weight-Related Disorders: Collaborative Research, Advocacy, and Policy Change. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp.169–198.
37.
PiranNTeallTLCounsellA (2020) The Experience of Embodiment Scale: Development, and psychometric evaluation. Body Image34: 117–134.
38.
PiranNTeallTLCounsellA (2023) Expanding the social lens: A quantitative study of the developmental theory of embodiment. Body Image44: 246–261.
39.
QianSJingYJXieM (2024) Validity and reliability of the Positive Beliefs About Rumination Scale in Chinese college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal38(09): 827–832.
40.
RosseelY (2012) Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48: 1–36.
41.
SchaeferLMBurkeNLThompsonJK, et al. (2015) Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Ques tionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4). Psychological Assessment27: 54–67.
42.
ShenJChenJTangX, et al. (2022) The effects of media and peers on negative body image among Chinese college students: A chained indirect influence model of appearance comparison and internalization of the thin ideal. Journal of Eating Disorders10: 49.
43.
ShiPHuangYZhangH, et al. (2020) Negative effect of negative body image on adolescents. Advances in Psychological Science28: 294–304.
44.
StojcicIDongXRenX (2020) Body image and sociocultural predictors of body image dissatisfaction in Croatian and Chinese women. Frontiers in Psychology11: 731.
45.
StreinerDLNormanGRCairneyJ (2024) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Sundgot-BorgenCFriborgOKolleE, et al. (2019) The healthy body image (HBI) intervention: Effects of a school-based cluster-randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. Body Image29: 122–131.
47.
SunWYangKXuY, et al. (2020) Validity and reliability of the Chinese body shame scale in college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology28: 724–729.
48.
TylkaTLWood-BarcalowNL (2015) The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image12: 53–67.
49.
VankerckhovenLClaesLRaemenL, et al. (2023) Inhabiting the body: Exploring the link between embodiment and identity in community adolescents. Body Image47: 101623.
50.
VoicaSAKlingJFrisénA, et al. (2021) Disordered eating through the lens of positive psychology: The role of embodiment, self-esteem and identity coherence. Body Image39: 103–113.
51.
WangKLiangRMaZ, et al. (2018) Body image attitude among Chinese college students. PsyCh Journal7: 31–40.
52.
WangKLiangRYuX, et al. (2020) The thinner the better: Evidence on the internalization of the slimness ideal in Chinese college students. PsyCh Journal9: 544–552.
53.
WangKShiHSGengFL, et al. (2016) Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China. Psychological Assessment28: e88–e100.
54.
WorthingtonRLWhittakerTA (2006) Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist34(6): 806–838.
55.
XiongCQXuYL (2009) Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale for Chinese demos. China Journal of Health Psychology17: 948–949.
56.
YangCDongZJWenHY (2023) The determinants and consequences of positive body image and its promotion strategies. Advances in Psychological Science31: 815–826.
