This study examines maternal satisfaction with social support and its association with socioeconomic factors in mothers of preterm infants during the first year of life. A quantitative, cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 42 mothers of preterm-born infants from a follow-up service at a large public hospital in Brazil. Data were collected using the Social Support Satisfaction Scale (SSSS) and a socioeconomic questionnaire. Statistical analyses revealed less reported social support from family and friends among single women with less education and less income. These findings highlight the impact of socioeconomic factors on maternal social support, providing valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals to design targeted interventions.
AfonsoTPontesFARSilvaSSC (2018) Social support and satisfaction of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Psicologia - Teoria e Prática20(2): 161–174.
2.
AlwhaibiRMZaidiUAlzeibyE, et al. (2019) A comparative study of socioeconomic status, perceived social support and psychological distress of mothers of children with and without disabilities. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation26(9): 1–16.
AraújoYBReichertAPVasconcelosMG, et al. (2013) Fragility of the social network of families of children with chronic disease. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem66(5): 675–681.
5.
BiesenJNSmithDA (2022) Daily relationship satisfaction and depressed mood: The moderating roles of support satisfaction, over- and underprovision. Journal of Family Psychology36(8): 1439–1450.
ChawlaDAgarwalR (2022) Preterm births and deaths: From counting to classification. Lancet Global Health10(11): e1537–e1538.
8.
CohenS (2004) Social Relationships and Health. American Psychologist59: 676–684.
9.
CruzVPDLelisDFAndradeJMO, et al. (2024) Socioeconomic status and the perceived social support in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: The SOLACE-Brasil study. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. Epub ahead of print 12 October 2024. DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2024.2414133
10.
CuevasKDSilverDRBrootenD, et al. (2005) The cost of prematurity: Hospital charges at birth and frequency of rehospitalizations and acute care visits over the first year of life: A comparison by gestational age and birth weight. American Journal of Nursing105(7): 56–64.
11.
CuschieriS (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia13(Suppl 1): S31–S34.
12.
Dunkel-SchetterC (2011) Psychological Science on pregnancy: Stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues. Annual Review of Psychology62: 531–558.
13.
FelizardoMJDAHenriquesNLSilvaJBD, et al. (2020) Families’ experiences in home care for premature children: A qualitative systematic review. Revista de Enfermagem do Centro-Oeste Mineiro10. DOI: 10.19175/recom.v10i0.3906
14.
GuoXLiXQiT, et al. (2021) A birth population-based survey of preterm morbidity and mortality by gestational age. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth21: 291.
15.
HaeussleinLGanoDGayCL, et al. (2023) Relationship between social support and post-discharge mental health symptoms in mothers of preterm infants. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology41(3): 260–274.
16.
HausenCFQuadrosJSDBickMA, et al. (2021) Family members of children exposed to human immunodeficiency virus: Satisfaction with social support. Revista Rene22: e61086.
LimaTJSouzaLE (2021) Social support as a protective factor for the mothers of children with Congenital Zika Syndrome. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva26(8): 3031–3040.
19.
LutkiewiczK (2020) Social support, perceived stress, socio-demographic factors and relationship quality among polish mothers of prematurely born children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(11): 3876.
20.
MarôcoJPCamposJADBVinagreMDG, et al. (2014) Brazil-Portugal transcultural adaptation of the Social Support Satisfaction Scale for college students. Psicologia27(2): 247–256.
21.
McCubbinMAMcCubbinH (1993) Family coping with health crises: The Family Resiliency Model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation. In DanielsonC (ed.) Families, health and illness. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, pp.21–63.
22.
MedeirosCCFranzoiMAHSilveiraAO (2020) Parental care and the promotion of child development in the context of prematurity. Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion33: 1–10.
23.
MontanhaurCDArenalesNGRodriguesOMPR (2022) Mothers of babies in NICU: Support network and coping. Fractal Revista de Psicologia34: e28423.
24.
MorniroliDTiraferriVMaioccoG, et al. (2023) Beyond survival: The lasting effects of premature birth. Frontiers in Pediatrics7(11): 1213243.
25.
NagyEMooreSSilveiraPP, et al. (2020) Low socioeconomic status, parental stress, depression, and the buffering role of network social capital in mothers. Journal of Mental Health31(3): 340–347.
26.
NamusokeFSekikuboMNamiiroF, et al. (2021) “What are you carrying?” Experiences of mothers with preterm babies in low-resource setting neonatal intensive care unit: A qualitative study. BMJ Open11: e043989.
27.
OliveiraJADBragaPPGomesIF, et al. (2019) Continuity of care in prematurity. Saúde (Santa Maria)45(1): 1–11.
28.
RibeiroJLP (1999) Social Support Satisfaction Scale (SSSS). Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada. Análise Psicológicaxii(3): 547–558.
SilvaCGFujinagaCIBrekEF, et al. (2021) Care of preterm newborns after hospital discharge: Investigation of family demands. Saúde e Pesquisa14(2): 289–297. DOI: 10.17765/2176-9206.2021v14n2e9035
31.
SnelgroveJWMurphyKE (2015) Preterm birth and social inequality: Assessing the effects of material and psychosocial disadvantage in a UK birth cohort. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica94: 766–775.
UemaRRodriguesBRissiG, et al. (2020) Family-centered care in neonatology: Health workers’ and families’ perceptions. Revista Enfermagem UERJ28: e45871.
34.
WethingtonEKesslerRC (1986) Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior27(1): 78–89.
ZhuZYuanLWangJ, et al. (2021) Mortality and morbidity of infants born extremely preterm at tertiary medical centers in China from 2010 to 2019. JAMA Network Open4(5): e219382.
