Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-9
Navigating women’s cancer prevention: Two cross-sectional studies to investigate psychosocial antecedents of cervical and breast cancer screening attendance
Despite population-based cancer screening programmes effectively decreasing mortality, participation rates are unsatisfactory for both cervical and breast screening. This research tested an integrated theory of planned behaviour model applied to cervical cancer screening (CCS; Study 1) and breast cancer screening (BCS; Study 2) attendance. Women residing in Campania (Italy) and belonging to each screening target population joined two independent surveys (Study 1: n = 332, Mage = 41.03, SD = 11.45; Study 2: n = 298, Mage = 55.03; SD = 5.17). In both studies, screening behaviour was predicted by intention to undergo the screening, action and coping planning. Significant predictors of intention were subjective norms, perceived behavioural control and self-identity in Study 1, and subjective norms, anticipated regret and self-identity in Study 2. A mediation analysis confirmed the role of action and coping planning in the intention-behaviour relation. This model can guide forthcoming interventions and steer enhancements in healthcare access.
AIRTUM (2023) I Numeri Del Cancro in Italia 2023. Brescia: Intermedia Editore.
2.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
3.
AjzenI (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of applied social psychology32(4): 665–683.
4.
AsareMLanningBAMontealegreJR, et al. (2023) Determinants of low-income women’s participation in self-collected samples for cervical cancer detection: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Community Health Equity Research & Policy44(1): 65–76.
5.
BianchiMDonizzettiARPalumboFCasoD (2024) Understanding colorectal cancer screening attendance: A comprehensive Theory of Planned Behaviour model. Health & Social Care in the Community. DOI: 10.1155/hsc/6626066.
6.
BoothARNormanPHarrisPR, et al. (2014) Using the theory of planned behaviour and self-identity to explain chlamydia testing intentions in young people living in deprived areas. British Journal of Health Psychology19(1): 101–112.
7.
BowieJVCurbowBLaveistTA, et al. (2003) The theory of planned behavior and intention to repeat mammography among African-American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology21(4): 23–42.
8.
CalleroPL (1985) Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly48(3): 203–215.
9.
CapassoMBianchiMCasoD (2024b) Psychosocial factors influencing parents’ acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination for their children: An Italian cross-sectional study. Vaccines12(3): 317.
10.
CapassoMConnerMCasoD (2024c) Testing an extended theory of planned behaviour in predicting covid-19 vaccination intention over the course of the pandemic: A three-wave repeated cross-sectional study. Heliyon10(3): e24826.
11.
CapassoMCalifanoGCaraccioloF, et al. (2023) Only the best for my kids: An extended TPB model to understand mothers’ use of food labels. Appetite191: 107040.
12.
CapassoMGonzález LeoneMFBianchiM, et al. (2024a) No more than “half prevention”: A qualitative study on psychosocial determinants of Covid-19 vaccination acceptance. Acta Psychologica248: 104406.
13.
CarforaVCasoDConnerM (2016) The role of self-identity in predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite106: 23–29.
14.
CasoDCarforaVConnerM (2016) Predicting intentions and consumption of fruit and vegetables in Italian adolescents. Effects of anticipated regret and self-identity. Psicologia sociale 11(3): 319–326.
15.
ConnerM (2015) Extending not retiring the theory of planned behaviour: A commentary on sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review9(2): 141–145.
16.
ConnerMNormanP (2022) Understanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength. Frontiers in Psychology13: 923464.
17.
CookeRFrenchDP (2008) How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychology and Health23(7): 745–765.
18.
DrossaertCHCBoerHSeydelER (2003) Prospective study on the determinants of repeat attendance and attendance patterns in breast cancer screening using the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology and Health18(5): 551–565.
19.
EbellMHThaiTNRoyaltyKJ (2018) Cancer screening recommendations: An international comparison of high income countries. Public Health Reviews39(1): 7.
FreitasCTuraLFCostaN, et al. (2012) A population-based breast cancer screening programme: Conducting a comprehensive survey to explore adherence determinants. European Journal of Cancer Care21(3): 349–359.
23.
GinsburgOVanderpuyeVBeddoeAM, et al. (2023) Women, power, and cancer: A Lancet Commission. The Lancet402(10417): 2113–2166.
24.
GodinGGagnéCMaziadeJ, et al. (2001) Breast cancer: The intention to have a mammography and a clinical breast examination - Application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychology and Health16(4): 423–441.
25.
González LeoneMFDonizzettiARBianchiM, et al. (2024) Users’ experience of public cancer screening services: Qualitative research findings and implications for public health system. Behavioral Sciences14(2): 139.
26.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
27.
JansenEELZielonkeNGiniA, et al. (2020) Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care127: 207–223.
28.
JöreskogKG (1970) Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. ETS Research Bulletin Series1970(2): i–31.
29.
KeshavarziAAsadiSAsadollahiA, et al. (2022) Tendency to breast cancer screening among rural women in Southern Iran: A structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis of theory of planned behavior. Breast Cancer Basic and Clinical Research16: 11782234221121000.
30.
KotzurMMacdonaldSO’CarrollRE, et al. (2022) What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool. BMJ Open12(9): e062738.
31.
Le BonniecAGourlanMPréauM, et al. (2022) Action control of colorectal cancer screening participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT). International Journal of Behavioral Medicine29(1): 122–130.
32.
LemmoDMartinoMLDonizzettiAR, et al. (2022) The relationship between healthcare providers and preventive practices: Narratives on access to cancer screening. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(17): 10942.
33.
LemmoDMartinoMLValloneF, et al. (2023) Clinical and psychosocial constructs for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening participation: A systematic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology23(2): 100354.
34.
López-PaniselloMBPérez-LacastaMJRuéM, et al. (2023) Factors influencing intention to participate in breast cancer screening. An exploratory structural model. PLoS One18(2): e0281454.
35.
LoudJTMurphyJ (2017) Cancer screening and early detection in the 21st century. Seminars in Oncology Nursing33(2): 121–128.
36.
MartinoMLLemmoDBianchiM, et al. (2024b) Public cancer screening services and participation: What meanings in users’ narratives to promote engagement?Nursing and Health Sciences26(3): e13146.
37.
MartinoMLLemmoDDonizzettiAR, et al. (2024a) Emotions and narrative reappraisal strategies of users of breast cancer screening: Reconstructing the past, passing through the present, and predicting emotions. Qualitative Health Research34(3): 263–276.
38.
MasonTEWhiteKM (2008) Applying an extended model of the theory of planned behaviour to breast self-examination. Journal of Health Psychology13(7): 946–955.
39.
McEachanRRCConnerMTaylorNJ, et al. (2011) Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review5(2): 97–144.
40.
MyersLGoodwinBRalphN, et al. (2022) A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail-out bowel cancer screening. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being14(3): 776–794.
41.
NigburDLyonsEUzzellD (2010) Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. The British Journal of Social Psychology/the British Psychological Society49(2): 259–284.
42.
NutiSSeghieriCVainieriM, et al. (2012) Assessment and improvement of the Italian healthcare system: First evidence from a pilot national performance evaluation system. Journal of Healthcare Management57(3): 182–199.
43.
OrbellSSheeranP (1998) ‘Inclined abstainers’: A problem for predicting health-related behaviour. TheBritish Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society37 ( Pt 2)(2): 151–165.
44.
O’CarrollREChambersJABrownleeL, et al. (2015) Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial. Social Science & Medicine (1967) 142: 118–127.
45.
PowerEVan JaarsveldCHMcCafferyK, et al. (2008) Understanding intentions and action in colorectal cancer screening. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 35(3): 285–294.
46.
PreacherKJSeligJP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures6(2): 77–98.
47.
PrestwichAKenworthyJConnerM (2017) Health Behavior Change: Theories, Methods and Interventions. Milton Park: Routledge.
48.
QuayeESAmeyiborLEKMokgethiK, et al. (2024) Healthy lifestyle and behavioural intentions: The role of self-identity, self-efficacy subjective norms, and attitudes. International Journal of Spa and Wellness7(2): 176–196.
49.
RhodesREde BruijnG (2013) How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. British Journal of Health Psychology18(2): 296–309.
50.
RoncancioAMWardKKSanchezIA, et al. (2015) Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cervical cancer screening among Latinas. Health Education & Behavior42(5): 621–626.
51.
RosseelY (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of statistical software48: 1–36.
52.
SandbergTConnerM (2008) Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. The British Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society47(Pt 4): 589–606.
53.
SandbergTConnerM (2009) A mere measurement effect for anticipated regret: Impacts on cervical screening attendance. The British Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society48(Pt 2): 221–236.
54.
ScaglioniGGuidettiMCavazzaN (2023a) The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology and Health38(3): 389–408.
55.
ScaglioniGCapassoMBianchiM, et al. (2024) Facing the emotional barriers to colorectal cancer screening. The roles of reappraisal and situation selection. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. Epub ahead of print 18 April 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-024-10284-4.
56.
ScaglioniGChiereghinABazzaniC, et al. (2023b) Psychosocial predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention: An Experiment on the invitation letter. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine30(6): 867–877.
57.
SheeranPWebbTL (2016) The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass10(9): 503–518.
58.
ShepherdLWattCLovellB (2017) The role of social-cognitive and emotional factors on testicular self-examination. Psycho-oncology26(1): 53–59.
59.
SniehottaFFSchwarzerRScholzU, et al. (2005) Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology35(4): 565–576.
60.
SoperD (2022) A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. Available at: https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc (accessed 15 December 2022).
61.
SparksP (1999) Subjective expected utility-based attitude–behavior models: The utility of self-identity. In: TerryDJHoggMA (eds) Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership. Applied Social Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.31–46.
62.
TengFFMitchellSMSekikuboM, et al. (2014) Understanding the role of embarrassment in gynaecological screening: A qualitative study from the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda. BMJ Open4(4): e004783.
63.
ValloneFLemmoDMartinoML, et al. (2022) Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review. Psycho-oncology31(9): 1435–1447.
64.
van der PligtJZeelenbergMvan DijkWW, et al. (1997) Affect, attitudes and decisions: Let’s be more specific. European Review of Social Psychology8(1): 33–66.
65.
Van der WerffEStegLKeizerK (2014) I am what i am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior46(5): 626–657.
66.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerM, et al. (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet370(9596): 1453–1457.
67.
WangXChenDXieT, et al. (2019) Predicting women’s intentions to screen for breast cancer based on the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research45(12): 2440–2451.
68.
XinTJiangYLiC, et al. (2023) Using planned behavior theory to understand cervical cancer screening intentions in Chinese women. Frontiers in Public Health11: 1063694.
69.
XuZGuoH (2019) Advantages of anticipated emotions over anticipatory emotions and cognitions in health decisions: A meta-analysis. Health Communication34(7): 774–781.
70.
ZielonkeNGiniAJansenEEL, et al. (2020) Evidence for reducing cancer-specific mortality due to screening for breast cancer in Europe: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care127: 191–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
