Drawing from the metacognitive literature, this experimental study examines how the relative ease of retrieving information (i.e. processing fluency) impacts individuals’ efficacy about engaging in family health discussions and interpersonal information seeking intention across two health topics: family organ donation status and family health history. Participants (N = 609) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Those in the easy retrieval task condition (versus a difficult or no task control), who were asked to recall information regarding two (versus six or zero) family members, reported greater processing fluency. Moreover, those who reported greater fluency also reported higher communication efficacy, and a greater intention to seek out family health information. Practically, this study highlights how metacognitive strategies may be used in healthcare settings to motivate patient information seeking. For example, it may be advantageous to start by collecting information for relatively few diseases/family members and slowly build a family history over time.
AfifiWAAfifiTD (2009) Avoidance among adolescents in conversations about their parents’ relationship: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships26(4): 488–511.
2.
AfifiWAMorganSEStephensonMT, et al. (2006) Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Communication Monographs73(2): 188–215.
3.
AfifiWAWeinerJL (2004) Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory14(2): 167–190.
4.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179–211.
5.
AlterALOppenheimerDM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nationPersonality and Social Psychology Review13(3): 219–235.
6.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84(2): 191–215.
7.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
BrashersDE (2001) Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication51(3): 477–497.
9.
ChangCCHuangMH (2020) Antecedents predicting health information seeking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management54: 102115.
10.
ClaassenLHennemanLJanssensACJW, et al. (2010) Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases: A discussion of the evidence. BMC Public Health10 (248): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-248
11.
ChoH (2015) The malleable effect of name fluency on pharmaceutical drug perception. Journal of Health Psychology20(10): 1369–1374.
12.
CohenJ (1992) Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science1(3): 98–101.
13.
EmanuelEJEmanuelLL (1992) Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association267(16): 2221–2226.
14.
GriffinRJDunwoodySNeuwirthK (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research80: 230–245.
15.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
HovickSR (2014) Understanding family health information seeking: A test of the theory of motivated information management. Journal of Health Communication19(1): 6–23.
17.
JohnsonJDDonohueWAAtkinCK, et al. (1995) A comprehensive model of information seeking: Tests focusing on a technical organization. Science Communication16(3): 274–303.
18.
KievikMter HuurneEFJGuttelingJM (2012) The action suited to the word? Use of the framework of risk information seeking to understand risk-related behaviors. Journal of Risk Research15(2): 131–147.
19.
KimHJangJ (2018) The easier the better: How processing fluency influences self efficacy and behavioral intention in pro-social campaign advertising. Sustainability10(12): 1–14.
20.
KuangKWilsonSR (2017) A meta-analysis of uncertainty and information management in illness contexts. Journal of Communication67(3): 378–401.
21.
KuangKWilsonSR (2021) Theory of motivated information management: A meta analytic review. Communication Theory31(3): 463–490.
22.
LeeSYHwangHHawkinsR, et al. (2008) Interplay of negative emotion and health self-efficacy on the use of health information and its outcomes. Communication Research35(3): 358–381.
23.
LitmanLRobinsonJAbberbockT (2017) TurkPrimecom: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods49(2): 433–442.
24.
McEachanRRCConnerMTaylorNJ, et al. (2011) Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review5(2): 97–144.
25.
MenonGRaghubirP (2003) Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework?Journal of Consumer Research30(2): 230–243.
26.
MooresTTCha-JanJCSmithDK (2006) Clarifying the role of self-efficacy and metacognition as predictors of performance: Construct development and test. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems37: 125–132.
27.
MorganSE (2004) The power of talk: African Americans’ communication with family members about organ donation and its impact on the willingness to donate organs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21(1): 112–124.
OkuharaTIshikawaHUenoH, et al. (2020) Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect. Health Psychology Open7(1): 1–9.
30.
OuMHoSS (2022) A meta-analysis of factors related to health information seeking: An integration from six theoretical frameworks. Communication Research49(4): 567–593.
31.
PajaresFSchunkDH (2002) Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In: AronsonJ (ed.) Improving Academic Achievement. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp.3–21.
32.
ParkSYGoE (2016) Health information seeking on the internet: The role of involvement in searching for and assessing online health information. Health Marketing Quarterly33(4): 327–341.
33.
PettyREBrinolPTormalaZL, et al. (2007) The role of metacognition in social judgement. In: KruglanskiAWHiggingsET (eds) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.254–284.
34.
RiggsEEShulmanHCLopezR (2022) Using infographics to reduce the negative effects of jargon on intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19. Public Understanding of Science31(6): 751–765.
35.
RimalRN (2001) Perceived risk and self-efficacy as motivators: Understanding individuals’ long-term use of health information. Journal of Communication51(4): 633–654.
36.
SchwarzN (2011) Feelings-as-information theory. In: van LangePKruglanskiAHigginsET (eds) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.1–32.
37.
SchwarzN (2015) Metacognition. In: MikulincerMShaverPRBorgidaE, et al. (eds) APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition. Washington DC: APA, pp.203–229.
38.
SchwarzNBlessHStrackF, et al. (1991) Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61(2): 195–202.
39.
SchwarzerR (ed.) (2014) Self-Efficacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
ShinDWChoJRoterDL, et al. (2013) Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: Patient–caregiver dyads study. Psycho-Oncology22(11): 2624–2631.
41.
ShulmanHCBullockOM (2019) Using metacognitive cues to amplify message content: A new direction in strategic communication. Annals of the International Communication Association43(1): 24–39.
42.
ShulmanHCBullockOM (2020) Don’t dumb it down: The effects of jargon in COVID-19 crisis communication. PLoS One15: 1–10.
43.
ShulmanHCSweitzerMD (2018) Varying metacognition through public opinion questions: How language can affect political engagement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology37: 224–237.
44.
SmithMLSosaETHochhalterAK, et al. (2011) Correlates of family health history discussions between college students and physicians: Does family cancer history make a difference?Journal of Primary Prevention32(5–6): 311–322.
45.
SongHSchwarzN (2008) If it’s hard to read it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science19(10): 986–988.
46.
TokunagaRSGustafsonA (2014) Seeking interpersonal information over the internet: An application of the theory of motivated information management to internet use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships31(8): 1019–1039.
47.
WallaceCL (2015) Family communication and decision making at the end of life: A literature review. Palliative and Supportive Care13(3): 815–825.
48.
WelchBMO’ConnellNSchiffmanJD (2015). 10 years later: Assessing the impact of public health efforts on the collection of family health history. American Journal of Medical GeneticsA167(9): 2026–2033. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37139
49.
WitteK (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process modelCommunication Monographs59: 335–349.
50.
WitteK (1994) Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs61(2): 113–134.
51.
YangQvan SteeSKRainsSA (2023) Comprehensive model of information seeking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Health Communication28(6): 360–374.
52.
YangZJAloeAMFeeleyTH (2014) Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication64(1): 20–41.
53.
ZaichkowskyJL (1994) Research notes: The personal involvement inventory: Reduction revision and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising23(4): 59–70.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
