Peritoneal dialysis, a home-based treatment, enhances patient well-being but is less preferred in Taiwan. This study uses in-depth interviews and ranking surveys to examine the decision-making process of 25 patients (13 male, 12 female, aged 31–80) who initiated peritoneal dialysis. Findings reveal that physicians significantly influence dialysis choices, with their expertise and leadership being core factors. Patients’ participation in decision-making is categorized as “active” or “passive” based on their knowledge and acceptance of treatments. Family members also play a crucial role in decisions for patients relying on familial care. Trust in physicians’ recommendations is crucial, emphasizing the importance of a strong doctor-patient relationship and ongoing support to boost patient confidence in peritoneal dialysis.
AbecassisMBartlettSTCollinsAJ, et al. (2008) Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: A National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology3(2): 471–480.
2.
AmirNMcCarthyHJTongA (2021) A working partnership: A review of shared decision-making in nephrology. Nephrology26: 851–857. 2021.
3.
Andersen-HollekimTLandstadBJSolbjørM, et al. (2021) Nephrologists’ experiences with patient participation when long-term dialysis is required. BMC Nephrology22(1): 58.
4.
BelloAKOkpechiIGOsmanMA, et al. (2022) Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes. Nature Reviews Nephrology18(12): 779–793.
5.
BreckenridgeD. (1997). Patients’ perception of why, how and by who dialysis treatment modality was chosen ANNA Journal24(3): 312–321.
6.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine44(5): 681–692. 1982.
7.
ChenNLinYLiangS, et al. (2018) Conflict when making decisions about dialysis modality. Journal of Clinical Nursing27(1-2): e138–e146.
8.
ChouCLChungCHChiuHW, et al. (2021) Association of pre-ESRD care education with patient outcomes in a 10-year longitudinal study of patients with CKD stages 3–5 in Taiwan. Scientific Reports11(1): 22602.
9.
ChuasuwanAPooripussarakulSThakkinstianA, et al. (2020) Comparisons of quality of life between patients underwent peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes18: 191.
10.
CoulterACollinsA (2011) Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality. London, UK: King’s Fund.
11.
de MaarJSde GrootMALuikPT, et al. (2016) GUIDE, a structured pre-dialysis programme that increases the use of home dialysis. Clinical Kidney Journal9(6): 826–832.
12.
DePasqualeNGreenJAEphraimPL, et al. (2022) Decisional conflict about kidney failure treatment modalities among adults with advanced CKD. Kidney Medicine4(9): 100521.
13.
HoYFHsuPTYangKL (2022) Peritoneal dialysis after shared decision-making: The disparity between reality and patient expectations. BMC Nursing21: 268.
14.
LeeYKKimYHKimDH, et al. (2023) Shared decision-making intervention regarding dialysis modality in patients with CKD stage 5. Medicine102(19): e33695.
15.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis an Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: CA Sage Publications.
RosenrollJAchelrodDSundmacherL (2013) The impact of social, cultural, and economic factors on the quality of life of patients with chronic kidney disease in Germany. Journal of Renal Care39(2): 93–101.
20.
SheridanSLHarrisRPWoolfSH (2004) Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine26(1): 56–66.
21.
SondrupMCoplandABlackM (2011) Supporting patient choice: An intervention to promote independent dialysis therapies. Journal of Nephrology Nursing38(6): 491–497.
22.
SongMKWardSE (2014) The extent of informed decision-making about starting dialysis: Does patients’ age matter?Journal of Nephrology27(5): 571–576.
23.
Taiwan Society of Nephrology (2023) 2022 annual report on kidney disease in Taiwan. Available at: https://www.tsn.org.tw/twrds.html (accessed 28 February 2024).
24.
ThomasNJenkinsKMcManusB, et al. (2016) The experience of older people in the shared decision-making process in advanced kidney care. BioMed Research International2016: 7859725.
WinterbottomABekkerHLConnerM, et al. (2014) Choosing dialysis modality: Decision making in a chronic illness context. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 2014; 17(5): 710–723.
27.
WuCWangYChenY, et al. (2021) Factors affecting the life satisfaction of patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Nursing Research70(2): E1–E7.
28.
ZazzeroniLPasquinelliGNanniE, et al. (2017) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney and Blood Pressure Research42: 717–727.
