Delay discounting (DD) is associated with smoking behavior and relapses. Episodic future thinking (EFT) is one of the leading interventions shown to reduce DD. The 1-month follow-up study with 60 participants that employed EFT as active intervention and episodic recent thinking (ERT) as control intervention was conducted in participants receiving smoking cessation treatment. In EFT group, there was significant decrease in DD rates from pre-intervention to post-intervention (p = 0.009), whereas no significant change was observed in ERT group (p = 0.497). DD rates in EFT group did not change significantly over 1 month (p = 0.059), while decrease was detected in ERT group (p = 0.011). Smoking cessation rates between groups were similar (p = 0.486). Adherence with completing follow-up evaluation forms and performing relevant exercises was higher in EFT group (p = 0.038, p = 0.006). Adding EFT to usual smoking cessation treatment did not increase smoking cessation rates, however feasibility of the self-administered exercises needs to be improved to clarify clinical effects.
AmlungMMarsdenEHolshausenK, et al. (2019) Delay discounting as a transdiagnostic process in psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry76: 1176–1186.
2.
Aonso-DiegoGGonzález-RozAMartínez-LoredoV, et al. (2021) Episodic future thinking for smoking cessation in individuals with substance use disorder: Treatment feasibility and acceptability. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment123: 108259.
3.
AtanceCMO’NeillDK (2001) Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences5: 533–539.
4.
BaileyAJGerstKFinnPR (2018) Delay discounting of losses and rewards in alcohol use disorder: The effect of working memory load. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors32: 197–204.
5.
BickelWKOdumALMaddenGJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology146: 447–454.
6.
BickelWKSteinJSPaluchRA, et al. (2020) Does episodic future thinking repair immediacy bias at home and in the laboratory in patients with prediabetes?Psychosomatic Medicine82: 699–707.
7.
BrownJMSteinJS (2022) Putting prospection into practice: Methodological considerations in the use of episodic future thinking to reduce delay discounting and maladaptive health behaviors. Frontiers in Public Health10: 1020171.
8.
ChiouW-BWuWH (2017) Episodic future thinking involving the nonsmoking self can induce lower discounting and cigarette consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs78: 106–112.
9.
DanielTOStantonCMEpsteinLH (2013) The future is now: Reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychological Science24: 2339–2342.
10.
DassenFCMJansenANederkoornC, et al. (2016) Focus on the future: Episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking. Appetite96: 327–332.
11.
EpsteinLHJimenez-KnightTHonanAM, et al. (2022) Imagine to remember: An episodic future thinking intervention to improve medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Preference and Adherence16: 95–104.
12.
ForsterSESteinhauerSROrtizA, et al. (2021) Evaluating effects of episodic future thinking on valuation of delayed reward in cocaine use disorder: A pilot study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse47: 199–208.
13.
GreenLMyersonJLichtmanD, et al. (1996) Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psychology and Aging11: 79–84.
14.
HeathertonTFKozlowskiLTFreckerRC, et al. (1991) The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction86: 1119–1127.
15.
HughesJRKeelyJNaudS (2004) Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction99: 29–38.
16.
JacksonJNMacKillopJ (2016) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and monetary delay discounting: A meta-analysis of case-control studies. Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging1: 316–325.
17.
KaplanBAAmlungMReedDD, et al. (2016) Automating scoring of delay discounting for the 21- and 27-item monetary choice questionnaires. Behavior Analyst39: 293–304.
18.
KirbyKNPetryNMBickelWK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology General128: 78–87.
19.
KotzDBatraAKastaunS (2020) Smoking cessation attempts and common strategies employed: A Germany-wide representative survey conducted in 19 waves from 2016 to 2019 (the Debra study) and analyzed by socioeconomic status. Deutsches Arzteblatt International117: 7.
20.
LevineBSvobodaEHayJF, et al. (2002) Aging and autobiographical memory: Dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval. Psychology and Aging17: 677–689.
21.
LiH (2021) Imagining the future: Future imagination training decreases delay discounting among internet addicts and non-problematic users. Frontiers in Psychology12: 731708.
22.
LovibondPFLovibondSH (1995a) The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy33: 335–343.
23.
LovibondSHLovibondPF (1995b) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
24.
MacKillopJAmlungMTFewLR, et al. (2011) Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology216: 305–321.
25.
MaddenGJPetryNMBadgerGJ, et al. (1997) Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: Drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology5: 256–262.
26.
MansouriTHCrandallAKTempleJL (2021) The effect of repeated episodic future thinking on the relative reinforcing value of snack food. Journal of Health Psychology26: 2402–2413.
27.
MellisAMSniderSEDeshpandeHU, et al. (2019) Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence204: 107507.
28.
MonterossoJRAinslieGXuJ, et al. (2007) Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task. Human Brain Mapping28: 383–393.
29.
PattonJHStanfordMSBarrattES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology51: 768–774.
30.
RaupachTBrownJHerbecA, et al. (2014) A systematic review of studies assessing the association between adherence to smoking cessation medication and treatment success. Addiction109: 35–43.
31.
ReimersSMaylorEAStewartN, et al. (2009) Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences47: 973–978.
32.
ReitsmaMBKendrickPJAbabnehE; GBD 2019 Tobacco Collaborators (2021) Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: Systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet397: 2337–2360.
33.
RöschSAStramacciaDFBenoitRG (2022) Promoting farsighted decisions via episodic future thinking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General151: 1606–1635.
34.
Ruhi-WilliamsPKingMJSteinJS, et al. (2022) Episodic future thinking about smoking-related illness: A preliminary investigation of effects on delay discounting, cigarette craving, and cigarette demand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19: 7136.
35.
RungJMMaddenGJ (2018) Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General147: 1349–1381.
36.
SariçamH (2018) The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in community and clinical samples. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research7: 1–30.
37.
SchacterDLAddisDRBucknerRL (2007) Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience8: 657–661.
38.
ScholtenHScheresAde WaterE, et al. (2019) Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review26: 1803–1849.
39.
SofisMJLemleySMLeeDC, et al. (2020) A web-based episodic specificity and future thinking session modulates delay discounting in cannabis users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors34: 532–540.
40.
StawarczykDD’ArgembeauA (2015) Neural correlates of personal goal processing during episodic future thinking and mind-wandering: An ALE meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping36: 2928–2947.
41.
SteinJSTeggeANTurnerJK, et al. (2018) Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: An investigation of the good-subject effect. Journal of Behavioral Medicine41: 269–276.
42.
SteinJSWilsonAGKoffarnusMN, et al. (2016) Unstuck in time: Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology233: 3771–3778.
43.
SyanSKGonzález-RozAAmlungM, et al. (2021) Delayed reward discounting as a prognostic factor for smoking cessation treatment outcome: A systematic review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research23: 1636–1645.
44.
TamamLGulecHKaratasG (2013) Barratt Dürtüsellik ölçeğiKısa formu (BIS-11-KF) Türkçe Uyarlama çalışması [The study for Turkish version of Barratt Impulsivity Scale Short Form (BIS-11-SF). Archives of Neuropsychiatry50: 130–134.
45.
TønnesenP (2009) Smoking cessation: How compelling is the evidence? A review. Health Policy91Suppl 1: S15–S25.
46.
UysalMKadakalFKarşidağC, et al. (2004) Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: Reliability in a Turkish sample and factor analysis. Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi52: 115–121.
47.
VossATJorgensenMKMurphyJG (2022) Episodic future thinking as a brief alcohol intervention for heavy drinking college students: A pilot feasibility study. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology30: 313–325.
48.
YangYShieldsGSWuQ, et al. (2019) Cognitive training on eating behaviour and weight loss: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Obesity Reviews20: 1628–1641.
49.
YeJ-YDingQ-YCuiJ-F, et al. (2022) A meta-analysis of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology75: 1876–1891.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
