Prescribed opioids are a mainstay pain treatment after traumatic injury, but a subgroup of patients may be at risk for continued opioid use. We evaluated the predictive utility of a traditional screening tool, the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT), and two other measures: average in-hospital milligram morphine equivalents (MME) per day and an assessment of opioid demand in predicting pain outcomes. Assessments of pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, interference, injury-related stress, and need for additional pain treatment) were administered at 2 weeks and 12 months post-discharge in a sample of 34 patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. Bayesian linear models were used to evaluate changes in responses over time as a function of predictors. High-risk ORT, higher MME per day, and greater opioid demand predicted less change in outcomes over time. This report provides first evidence that malleable factors of opioid and opioid demand have utility in predicting pain outcomes following traumatic injury.
AssmannSFPocockSJEnosLE, et al. (2000) Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet355(9209): 1064–1069.
3.
BasilicoMBhashyamARHarrisMB,et al . (2019) Prescription opioid type is not associated with increased likelihood of prolonged use in opiate-naïve patients after orthopaedic surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons27(9): e423–e429.
4.
BickelWKJohnsonMWKoffarnusMN, et al. (2014) The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: Reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology10: 641–677.
5.
BurgessHJSiddiquiABurgessFW (2014) Long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain and the risk of opioid addiction. Rhode Island Medical Journal97: 25–28.
6.
BürknerPC (2017) Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software80(1): 1–28.
7.
ChaudharyMASchoenfeldAJHarlowAF, et al. (2017) Incidence and predictors of opioid prescription at discharge after traumatic injury. JAMA Surgery152(10): 930–936.
8.
CheatleMDComptonPADhingraL, et al. (2019) Development of the revised opioid risk tool to predict opioid use disorder in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Journal of Pain20: 842–851.
9.
ChiaYYLiuKWangJJ, et al. (1999) Intraoperative high dose fentanyl induces postoperative fentanyl tolerance. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia46(9): 872–877.
10.
ChouRDeyoRDevineB, et al. (2014) The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid treatment of chronic pain. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. (218): 1–219.
11.
ClarkMRHurleyRWAdamsMCB (2018) Re-assessing the validity of the opioid risk tool in a tertiary academic pain management center population. Pain Medicine19(7): 1382–1395.
12.
CooperDWLindsaySLRyallDM, et al. (1997) Does intrathecal fentanyl produce acute cross-tolerance to i.v. morphine?British Journal of Anaesthesia78(3): 311–313.
13.
CromptonJGPollackKMOyetunjiT, et al. (2010) Racial disparities in motorcycle-related mortality: An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. American Journal of Surgery200(2): 191–196.
14.
DelgadoMKHuangYMeiselZ, et al. (2018) National Variation in opioid prescribing and risk of prolonged use for opioid-naive patients treated in the emergency department for ankle sprains. Annals of Emergency Medicine72(4): 389–400.e1.
15.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021) Calculating total daily dose of opioids for safer dosage.
16.
Fatima LakhaS (2014) Opioids, substance abuse & addictions section original research articles characteristics of chronic noncancer pain patients assessed with the opioid risk tool in a canadian tertiary care pain clinic. Pain Medicine15: 1743–1749.
17.
GelmanACarlinJBSternHS, et al. ( 2013) Bayesian Data Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
18.
GreenwaldMK (2008) Behavioral economic analysis of drug preference using multiple choice procedure data. Drug and Alcohol Dependence93(1-2): 103–110.
19.
GreenwaldMK (2010) Effects of experimental unemployment, employment and punishment analogs on opioid seeking and consumption in heroin-dependent volunteers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence111(1-2): 64–73.
20.
GreenwaldMKHurshSR (2006) Behavioral economic analysis of opioid consumption in heroin-dependent individuals: Effects of unit price and pre-session drug supply. Drug and Alcohol Dependence85(1): 35–48.
GreenwaldMKSteinmillerCL (2009) Behavioral economic analysis of opioid consumption in heroin-dependent individuals: Effects of alternative reinforcer magnitude and post-session drug supply. Drug and Alcohol Dependence104(1-2): 84–93.
23.
GuignardBBossardAECosteC, et al. (2000) Acute opioid tolerance: Intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology93(2): 409–417.
24.
HarvinJAAlbaradoRTruongVTT, et al.; MAST Study Group (2021) Multi-modal analgesic strategy for trauma: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons232(3): 241–251.e3.
25.
HarvinJAGreenCEVincentLE, et al. (2018) Multi-modal analgesic strategies for Trauma (MAST): Protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open3(1): e000192.
26.
HeardKLedbetterCMHoppeJA (2020) Association of emergency department opioid administration with ongoing opioid use: A retrospective cohort study of patients with back pain. Academic Emergency Medicine. (27): 1158–1165.
27.
HedegaardH, et al. (2021) Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2020. National Center for Health Sciences, vol. 426, pp.1–8.
28.
HurshSRRomaPG (2013) Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior99(1): 98–124.
29.
JeffreysH (ed.) (1961) Theory of Probability, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KesslerDAWebberHESuchtingR, et al. Early pain, stress, and opioid use following traumatic injury. Journal of Opioid Management2022; 18(1): 17–25.
31.
KoffarnusMNKaplanBA (2018) Clinical models of decision making in addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior164: 71–83.
32.
LeeMSilvermanSMHansenH, et al. (2011) A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician14: 145–161.
33.
LeeMDWagenmakersE-J (2013) Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
LeePLe SauxMSiegelR, et al. (2019) Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of acute pain in US emergency departments: Meta-analysis and systematic review. American Journal of Emergency Medicine37(9): 1770–1777.
35.
MacKillopJ (2016) The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research40: 672–685.
36.
McElreathR (2018) Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course With Examples in R and Stan. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
37.
MooreTMJonesTBrowderJH, et al. (2009) A comparison of common screening methods for predicting aberrant drug-related behavior among patients receiving opioids for chronic pain management. Pain Medicine10(8): 1426–1433.
38.
PetryNM (2000) Effects of increasing income on polydrug use: A comparison of heroin, cocaine and alcohol abusers. Addiction95(5): 705–717.
39.
PetryNM (2001) A behavioral economic analysis of polydrug abuse in alcoholics: Asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence62(1): 31–39.
40.
PetryNMBickelWK (1998) Polydrug abuse in heroin addicts: A behavioral economic analysis–a reply to Petry & Bickel. Addiction93(4): 604–606.
41.
PickoverAMMessinaBGCorreiaCJ, et al. (2016) A behavioral economic analysis of the nonmedical use of prescription drugs among young adults. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology24(1): 38–47.
42.
PocockSJAssmannSEEnosLE, et al. (2002) Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine21(19): 2917–2930.
43.
RybGECooperC (2010) Race/ethnicity and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A national trauma data bank study. Journal of the National Medical Association102(10): 865–869.
44.
SchoenfeldAJBelmontPjJrSeeAA, et al. (2013) Patient demographics, insurance status, race, and ethnicity as predictors of morbidity and mortality after spine trauma: A study using the National Trauma Data Bank. Spine Journal13(12): 1766–1773.
45.
SchwartzLPRomaPGHenningfieldJE, et al. (2019) Behavioral economic demand metrics for abuse deterrent and abuse potential quantification. Drug and Alcohol Dependence198: 13–20.
46.
StrandMAEukelHNFrenzelO, et al. (2022) Opioid risk stratification in the community pharmacy: The utility of the Opioid Risk Tool. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy18(12): 4065–4071.
47.
StricklandJCLileJAStoopsWW (2019) Evaluating non-medical prescription opioid demand using commodity purchase tasks: test-retest reliability and incremental validity. Psychopharmacology236(9): 2641–2652.
48.
R Core Team (2020a) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
49.
R Core Team (2020b) ‘RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.2’.
50.
WebsterLRWebsterRM (2005) Predicting aberrant behaviors in opioid-treated patients: Preliminary validation of the opioid risk tool. Pain Medicine6(6): 432–442.
51.
WestonERakerCHuangD, et al. (2019) Opioid use after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecologic Oncology155(1): 119–125.
52.
YoonJHSuchtingRKesslerD, et al. (2022) Utility of a brief assessment of opioid demand among post-discharge Trauma Care Patients. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology30(1): 15–22.
53.
YoungMFHernHGAlterHJ, et al. (2013) Racial differences in receiving morphine among prehospital patients with blunt trauma. Journal of Emergency Medicine45(1): 46–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
