To maintain social distancing in the long term, in the current COVID-19 scenario, people’s motivation must be strong and of high quality. Many governments adopted measures enforcing social distancing. Enforcement, however, can produce feelings of defiance and backfiring effects. The present work aims at investigating the relationship between autonomous motivation and intentions to maintain social distancing, through adherence to recommendations and feelings of defiance. A sample of 502 Italian residents, from different parts of Italy, completed an online survey assessing their present behavior, levels of autonomous motivation and feelings of defiance, as well as intentions to observe social distancing in the short and long term. Results support the hypotheses that autonomous motivation is related to stronger intentions to maintain social distancing, particularly in the long term, and that feelings of defiance mediate this relationship. These results underline importance of promoting understanding and internalizing reasons for social distancing, beyond norms.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
BrehmJW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance. San Diego: Academic Press.
3.
BrooksJMHuckGIwanagaK, et al (2018) Towards an integration of the health promotion models of self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior among people with chronic pain. Rehabilitation Psychology63(4): 553–562.
4.
ChanDKFungYKXingS, et al (2014) Myopia prevention, near work, and visual acuity of college students: Integrating the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. Journal of Behavioral Medicine37(3): 369–380.
5.
DeciELRyanRM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
6.
DeciELRyanRM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227–268.
7.
DeSalvoKBFisherWPTranK, et al (2006) Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Quality of Life Research15(2): 191–201.
8.
DezecacheGFrithCDDeroyO (2020) Pandemics and the great evolutionary mismatch. Current Biology30(10): R417–R419.
9.
DiamantopoulosASarstedtMFuchsC, et al (2012) Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40(3): 434–449.
10.
FisherGGMatthewsRAGibbonsAM (2016) Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology21(1): 3–23.
11.
JovanovićVLazićM (2020) Is longer always better? A comparison of the validity of single-item versus multiple-item measures of life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life15(3): 675–692.
12.
KisslerSMTedijantoCGoldsteinE, et al (2020) Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science368(6493): 860–868.
13.
KoponenAMSimonsenNSuominenS (2017) Quality of primary health care and autonomous motivation for effective diabetes self-management among patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology Open4(1): 2055102917707181.
14.
LegateNNguyenTTWeinsteinN, et al (2021) A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint from PsyArXiv, 30May2021
15.
LegaultLGutsellJNInzlichtM (2011) Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science22(12): 1472–1477.
16.
McGarrityLAHuebnerDM (2014) Behavioral intentions to HIV test and subsequent testing: The moderating role of sociodemographic characteristics. Health Psychology33(4): 396–400.
17.
MironAMBrehmJW (2006) Reactance theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie37(1): 9–18.
18.
NgJYYNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC, et al (2012) Self-determination theory applied to health contexts. Perspectives on Psychological Science7(4): 325–340.
19.
RainsSA (2013) The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research39(1): 47–73.
20.
RyanRMConnellJP (1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5): 749–761.
21.
RyanRMDeciEL (2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford.
22.
RyanRMDeciEL (2020) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology61, 101860.
23.
RyanRMPatrickHDeciEL, et al. (2008) Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. The European Health Psychologist10(1): 2–5.
24.
SheeranP (2002) Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology12(1): 1–36.
25.
SheeranPWebbTL (2016) The intention-Behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass10(9): 503–518.
26.
SilvaMNMarklandDCarraçaEV, et al (2011) Exercise Autonomous Motivation predicts 3-yr weight loss in women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise43(4): 728–737.
27.
SoenensBVansteenkisteMNiemiecCP (2009) Should parental prohibition of adolescents’ peer relationships be prohibited?Personal Relationships16(4): 507–530.
28.
SuYLReeveJ (2011) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review23(1): 159–188.
29.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2019) Using Multivariate Statistics, 7th edn.Boston: Pearson.
30.
TeixeiraPJMarquesMMSilvaMN, et al (2020) A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts. Motivation Science6(4): 438–455.
31.
Van PetegemSSoenensBVansteenkisteM, et al (2015) Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development86(3): 903–918.
32.
VansteenkisteMSoenensBVan PetegemS, et al (2014) Longitudinal associations between adolescent perceived degree and style of parental prohibition and internalization and defiance. Developmental Psychology50(1): 229–236.
33.
WeinsteinNVansteenkisteMPaulmannS (2020) Don’t you say it that way! Experimental evidence that controlling voices elicit defiance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology88, 103949.
WilliamsGCMcGregorHASharpD, et al (2006) Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychology25(1): 91–101.
36.
WilliamsGCNiemiecCPPatrickH, et al (2009) The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine37(3): 315–324.
37.
WilliamsGCRodinGCRyanRM, et al (1998) Autonomous regulation and long-term medication adherence in adult outpatients. Health Psychology17(3): 269–276.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
