To examine whether psychological traits (PT) had causal effects on Mouth Ulcers (MU), we applied two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to genetics association summary statistics of eleven PT and MU. After the adjustment of outlier variants, genetic correlations and multiple testing, well-being (WB) spectrum PT like life satisfactory (odds ratio [OR] = 0.638 per one standard deviation increment of PT score) had protective effects on MU. Reverse WB traits like neuroticism (OR = 1.60) increased the risk of MU. The lack of well-being characteristics may increase the risk of MU, which highlighted the value of preventive oral care for people who have a reverse mental condition.
Al-OmiriMKKarasnehJAlhijawiMM, et al. (2015) Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS): A preliminary within-subject study of quality of life, oral health impacts and personality profiles. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine44(4): 278–283.
2.
AndrewsVHHallHR (1990) The effects of relaxation/imagery training of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: A preliminary study. Psychosomatic Medicine52(5): 526–535.
3.
BaselmansBMLJansenRIpHF, et al. (2019) Multivariate genome-wide analyses of the well-being spectrum. Nature Genetics51(3): 445–451.
4.
BowdenJDavey SmithGBurgessS (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: Effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. International Journal of Epidemiology44(2): 512–525.
5.
BowdenJDavey SmithGHaycockPC, et al. (2016) Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genetic Epidemiology40(4): 304–314.
6.
BrionMJAShakhbazovKVisscherPM (2013) Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. International Journal of Epidemiology42(5): 1497–1501.
7.
BurgessSBowdenJFallT, et al. (2017) Sensitivity analyses for robust causal inference from mendelian randomization analyses with multiple genetic variants. Epidemiology28(1): 30.
8.
BurgessSDaviesNMThompsonSG (2016) Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genetic Epidemiology40(7): 597–608.
9.
BurgessSFoleyCNAllaraE, et al. (2020) A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants. Nature Communications11(1): 1–11.
10.
ChenHSuiQChenY, et al. (2015) Impact of haematologic deficiencies on recurrent aphthous ulceration: A meta-analysis. British Dental Journal218(4): E8.
11.
ChoiKWChenCYSteinMB, et al. (2019) Assess-ment of bidirectional relationships between physical activity and depression among adults: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study. JAMA Psychiatry76(4): 399–408.
12.
DayFROngKKPerryJRB (2018) Elucidating the genetic basis of social interaction and isolation. Nature Communications9(1): 1–6.
13.
DuddingTHaworthSLindPA, et al. (2019) Genome wide analysis for mouth ulcers identifies associations at immune regulatory loci. Nature Communications10(1): 1–12.
14.
Everson-RoseSALewisTT (2005) Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular diseases. Annual Review of Public Health26: 469–500.
15.
EysenckSBGEysenckHJBarrettP (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences6(1): 21–29.
16.
FerozeUMartinDKalantar-ZadehK, et al. (2012) Anxiety and depression in maintenance dialysis patients: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study and brief literature review. Journal of Renal Nutrition22(1): 207–210.
17.
FitzpatrickSGCohenDMClarkAN (2019) Ulcerated lesions of the oral mucosa: Clinical and histologic review. Head and Neck Pathology13(1): 91–102.
18.
GalloCDBMimuraMAMSugayaNN (2009) Psychological stress and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Clinics64(7): 645–648.
19.
GavicLCigicLBiocina LukendaD, et al. (2014) The role of anxiety, depression, and psychological stress on the clinical status of recurrent aphthous stomatitis and oral lichen planus. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine43(6): 410–417.
20.
GroverSDel GrecoFMSteinCM, et al. (2017) Mendelian randomization. In: Elston R (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc., pp.581–628.
21.
HemaniGBowdenJDavey SmithG (2018) Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Human Molecular Genetics27(R2): R195–R208.
22.
HemaniGZhengJElsworthB, et al. (2018) The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife7: e34408.
23.
HijaziKLoweTMehargC, et al. (2015) Mucosal microbiome in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Journal of Dental Research94(3 Suppl): 87S–94S.
24.
IrwinMR (2008) Human psychoneuroimmunology: 20 Years of discovery. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity22(2): 129–139.
25.
KalpanaRThubashiniMSundharamBS (2014) Detection of salivary interleukin-2 in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology18(3): 361–364.
26.
KarthikeyanPAswathN (2016) Stress as an etiologic co-factor in recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. Journal of Oral Science58(2): 237–240.
27.
KeenanAVSpivakovksyS (2013) Stress associated with onset of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Evidence-Based Dentistry14(1): 25.
28.
LarssonSCBäckMReesJMB, et al. (2020) Body mass index and body composition in relation to 14 cardiovascular conditions in UK Biobank: A Mendelian randomization study. European Heart Journal41: 221–226.
29.
LawlorDAHarbordRMSterneJAC, et al. (2008) Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine27(8): 1133–1163.
30.
LinnérRKBiroliPKongE, et al. (2019) Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences. Nature Genetics51(2): 245–257.
31.
MaRChenHZhouT, et al. (2015) Effect of bedtime on recurrent aphthous stomatitis in college students. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology119(2): 196–201.e2.
32.
MinhasSSajjadAKashifM, et al. (2019) Oral ulcers presentation in systemic diseases: An update. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences7(19): 3341–3347.
33.
Montgomery-CrannyJAWallaceARogersHJ, et al. (2015) Management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis in children. Dental Update42(6): 564–572.
34.
MorrisonJKnoblauchNMarcusJH, et al. (2020) Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. Nature Genetics52: 1–8.
35.
NagelMJansenPRStringerS, et al. (2018) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nature Genetics50(7): 920–927.
36.
OkbayABaselmansBMLDe NeveJE, et al. (2016) Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nature Genetics48(6): 624–633.
37.
PapadimitriouNDimouNTsilidisKK, et al. (2020) Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: A Mendelian randomisation analysis. Nature Communications11(1): 1–10.
38.
PedersenA (1989) Psychologic stress and recurrent aphthous ulceration. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine18(2): 119–122.
39.
SaikalySKSaikalyTSSaikalyLE (2018) Recurrent aphthous ulceration: A review of potential causes and novel treatments. Journal of Dermatological Treatment29(6): 542–552.
40.
SandersonEDavey SmithGWindmeijerF, et al. (2019) An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings. International Journal of Epidemiology48(3): 713–727.
41.
ScullyC (2006) Aphthous ulceration. New England Journal of Medicine355(2): 165–172.
42.
VerbanckMChenCYNealeB, et al. (2018) Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nature Genetics50(5): 693–698.
43.
WatanabeKStringerSFreiO, et al. (2019) A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nature Genetics51(9): 1339–1348.
44.
ZhaoQWangJHemaniG, et al. (2020) Statistical inference in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization using robust adjusted profile score. Annals of Statistics48(3): 1742–1769.
45.
ZuberVColijnJMKlaverC, et al. (2020) Selecting likely causal risk factors from high-throughput experiments using multivariable Mendelian randomization. Nature Communications11(1): 1–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
