Given the lack of an effective treatment for COVID-19, it is essential to explore the psychological variables involved in the development and maintenance of preventive behaviors during the current epidemic. In this study, we analyze the predictive value of perceived stress (measured with the Perceived Stress Scale) and coping styles (measured with the Extreme Risks Coping Scale) for adhering to infection prevention behavior in a sample of 1132 Mexican adults aged between 18 and 84. A logistic regression analysis showed that Active Coping and Cognition-Focused Coping, in addition to age and being a student, proved to be predictors of adhering to SARS COV2 preventive behaviors (R2 = 0.282). The findings from this study can be used to design strategies to promote potentially effective epidemic mitigation behaviors.
AikenLGroth-MarnatG (2005) Psychological Testing and Assessment, 12th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
2.
AjzenIFishbeinM (1970) The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology6(4): 466–487.
3.
ByrneBM (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
4.
CaoWFangZHouG, et al. (2020) The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research287: 112934.
5.
ChewQHWeiKCVasooS, et al. (2020) Narrative synthesis of psychological and coping responses towards emerging infectious disease outbreaks in the general population: Practical considerations for the COVID-19 pandemic. Singapore Medical Journal. Epub ahead of print 3 April 2020. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020046.
6.
CohenSKamarakTMermelsteinR (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour24: 385–396.
7.
Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) (2020) ACUERDO por el que se establecen las medidas preventivas que se deberán implementar para la mitigación y control de los riesgos para la salud que implica la enfermedad por el virus SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19). Available at: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5590339&fecha=24/03/2020 (accessed 22 May 2020).
8.
DickieRRasmussenSCainR, et al. (2017) The effects of perceived social norms on handwashing behaviour in students. Psychology, Health, & Medicine23(2): 154–159.
9.
FlesiaLFiettaVColicinoE, et al. (2020) Stable psychological traits predict perceived stress related to the COVID-19 outbreak. PsyArXiv. Epub ahead of print 24 April 2020. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/yb2h8.
10.
Gamonal-LimcaocoSMonteroEFernandezJM, et al. (2020) Anxiety, worry and perceived stress in the world due to the COVID-19 pandemic, March 2020. Preliminary Results. Epub ahead of print 6 April 2020. DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.03.20043992.
11.
GaskinCJHappellB (2014) On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International Journal of Nursing Studies51(3): 511–521.
12.
GonzálezRMTHernándezRL (2007) Factor structure of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) in a sample from Mexico. The Spanish Journal of Psychology10(1): 199–206.
GuyAANielKDu BoisSN (2018) Emotional support, active coping, and ART adherence in young African American men who have sex with men: A pilot mediation model. JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care29(4): 612–618.
15.
KokoszkaA (2017) Treatment adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus correlates with different coping styles, low perception of self-influence on disease, and depressive symptoms. Patient Preference and Adherence11: 587–595.
16.
KuangJAshrafSDasU, et al. (2020) Awareness, risk perception, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in communities of Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(19): 7177. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197177.
17.
LazarusRSFolkmanS (1986) Estrés y Procesos Cognitivos. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
18.
LewnardJALoNC (2020) Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases20(6): 631–633.
19.
LiYPengJ (2020) Coping strategies as predictors of anxiety: Exploring positive experience of Chinese university in health education in COVID-19 pandemic. Creative Education11: 735–750.
20.
López-VázquezEMarvánML (2004) Validación de una escala de afrontamiento frente a riesgos extremos. Salud Pública de México46: 216–221.
21.
LynggaardVNielseCVZwislerAD, et al. (2017) The patient education—Learning and coping strategies—Improves adherence in cardiac rehabilitation (LC-REHAB): A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Cardiology236: 65–70.
22.
McDonaldRP (1999) Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23.
MakWWSLawRWWooJ, et al. (2009) Social support and psychological adjustment to SARS: The mediating role of self-care self-efficacy. Psychology and Health24(2): 161–174.
MukhtarS (2020) Mental health and emotional impact of COVID-19: Applying health belief model for medical staff to general public of Pakistan. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity87: 28–29.
26.
MuñizJElosuaPHambletonRK (2013) Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema25(2): 151–157.
27.
OliveiraCGTDEnumoSRFPaulaKMPD (2017) A psychological intervention proposal on coping with pain for children with Sickle Cell Disease. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)34(3): 355–366.
28.
OliverGWardleJGibsonL (2020) Stress and food choice: A laboratory study. Psychosomatic Medicine62: 853–865.
29.
ParkCLRussellBSFendrichM, et al. (2020) Americans’ COVID-19 stress, coping, and adherence to CDC guidelines. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Epub ahead of print 29 May 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9.
30.
PelletierJELytleLALaskaMN (2016) Stress, health risk behaviors, and weight status among community college students. Health Education & Behavior43(2): 139–144.
31.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCC (1994) The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
32.
RobillardRSaadMEdwardsJD, et al. (2020) Social, financial and psychological stress during an emerging pandemic: Observations from a population web-based survey in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. MedRxiv. Epub ahead of print 30 June 2020. DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.29.20142638.
33.
Rosas-SantiagoFJMarvánMLLagunes-CórdobaR (2017) Adaptation of a scale to measure coping strategies in informal primary caregivers of psychiatric patients. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing24: 563–569.
34.
RosentockIM (1974) The health belief model and preventive health behaviour. Health Education Monographs2(4): 354–386.
35.
SelyeH (1975) Stress Without Distress. New York: The New American Library.
36.
SuedfeldP (1997) Reactions to societal trauma: Distress and/or eustress. Political Psychology18(4): 849–861.
37.
TorresSJNowsonCA (2007) Relationship between stress, eating behavior, and obesity. Nutrition23(11–12): 887–894.
38.
UmucuELeeB (2020) Examining the impact of COVID-19 on stress and coping strategies in individuals with disabilities and chronic conditions. Rehabilitation Psychology. Epub ahead of print 14 May 2020. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000328.
39.
Van BortelTBasnayakeAWurieF, et al. (2016) Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community, and international levels. Bulletin of the World Health Organization94(3): 210–214.
40.
WatkinsMW (2018) Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology44: 219–246.
WuKKChanSKMaTM (2005) Posttraumatic stress after SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases11(8): 1297–1300.
44.
ZarrabianSHassani-AbharianP (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and the importance of cognitive rehabilitation. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience11(2): 129–132.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
