A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to examine the overall prevalence of psychological health outcomes during COVID-19. Seven databases were systematically searched to include studies reporting on at least one psychological outcome. The pooled prevalence of primary psychological outcomes was 26% (95%CI: 21–32). Pooled prevalence for symptoms of PTSD was 33% (0–86), anxiety 28% (21–36), stress 27% (14–43), and depression 22% (13–33). The prevalence of psychological outcomes was similar in healthcare workers and in the general population (34% [24–44] and 33% [27–40] respectively). High prevalence figures support the importance of ensuring adequate provision of resources for mental health.
ArchardDCaplanA (2020) Is it wrong to prioritise younger patients with covid-19?BMJ369: m1509.
2.
ArnoneD (2020, in press) Mental health services in the wake of COVID-19 and opportunities for change. British Journal of Psychiatry.
3.
BarendregtJJDoiSALeeYY, et al. (2013) Meta-analysis of prevalence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health67: 974–978.
4.
BoHXLiWYangY, et al. (2020) Posttraumatic stress symptoms and attitude toward crisis mental health services among clinically stable patients with COVID-19 in China. Psychological Medicine 27: 1–2.
5.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJP, et al. (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods1: 97–111.
6.
BrooksSKWebsterRKSmithLE, et al. (2020) The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet395: 912–920.
7.
CaiHTuBMaJ, et al. (2020) Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in Hunan between January and March 2020 during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei, China. Medical Science Monitor26: e924171.
8.
CaoJWeiJZhuH, et al. (2020a) A study of basic needs and psychological wellbeing of medical workers in the fever clinic of a Tertiary General Hospital in Beijing during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics89: 252–254.
9.
CaoWFangZHouG, et al. (2020b) The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research287: 112934.
10.
ChungJPYYeungWS (2020) Staff mental health self-assessment during the COVID-19 outbreak. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry30: 34.
11.
ConybeareDBeharESolomonA, et al. (2012) The PTSD Checklist-civilian version: Reliability, validity, and factor structure in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology68: 699–713.
12.
CourtinEKnappM (2017) Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community25: 799–812.
13.
Furuya-KanamoriLBarendregtJJDoiSAR (2018) A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare16: 195–203.
14.
GaoJZhengPJiaY, et al. (2020) Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE15: e0231924.
15.
HolmesEAO’ConnorRCPerryVH, et al. (2020) Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry7: 547–560.
16.
HolzerCEC3rd (2013) Race, ethnicity, and the epidemiology of mental disorders in adults. In: PaniaguaFAYamadaA-M (eds) Handbook of Multicultural Mental Health: Assessment and Treatment of Diverse Populations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts, US: Academic Press, pp. 89–109.
17.
HortonR (2020) Offline: COVID-19 and the NHS-“a national scandal”. The Lancet395: 1022.
18.
HuangJZHanMFLuoTD, et al. (2020) Mental health survey of 230 medical staff in a tertiary infectious disease hospital for COVID-19. Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases38: 192–195.
19.
HuangYWangYWangH, et al. (2019) Prevalence of mental disorders in China: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. The Lancet Psychiatry6: 211–224.
20.
JohnsonBTAcabchukRL (2018) What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research. Social Science & Medicine196: 218–226.
21.
JohnsonSUUlvenesPGOktedalenT, et al. (2019) Psychometric properties of the general anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample. Frontiers in Psychology10: 1713.
22.
JokelainenJTimonenMKeinanen-KiukaanniemiS, et al. (2019) Validation of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in older adults. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care37: 353–357.
KangLMaSChenM, et al. (2020) Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity87: 11–17.
KwokKOLiKKChanHHH, et al. (2020) Community responses during early phase of COVID-19 epidemic, Hong Kong. Emerging Infectious Diseases26(7): 1575–1579.
27.
LaiJMaSWangY, et al. (2020) Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open3: e203976.
28.
LamSCAroraTGreyI, et al. (2020) Perceived risk and protection from infection and depressive symptoms among healthcare workers in Mainland China and Hong Kong during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry 11: 686.
29.
LevisBBenedettiAThombsBD, et al. (2019) Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: Individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ365: l1476.
30.
LiuNZhangFWeiC, et al. (2020) Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Research287: 112921.
31.
LuWWangHLinY, et al. (2020) Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Research288: 112936.
32.
LuoMGuoLYuM, et al. (2020) The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research291: 113190.
33.
MarksDF (2018) A General Theory of Behaviour. London: SAGE.
34.
MarshallJMDunsanDABartikW. (2019) The digital psychiatrist: In search of evidence-based apps for anxiety and depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry10: 831.
35.
MaslowAH (1943) The theory of human motivation. Psychological Review50: 370–396.
36.
MatiasTDominskiFHMarksDF (2020) Human needs in COVID-19 isolation. Journal of Health Psychology25: 871–882.
37.
MelsenWGBootsmaMCRoversMM, et al. (2014) The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses. Clinical Microbiology and Infection20: 123–129.
38.
MoYDengLZhangL, et al. (2020) Work stress among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan for fighting against the COVID-19 epidemic. Journal of Nursing Management28: 1002–1009.
39.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine6: e1000097.
40.
Naser MoghadasiA (2020) Evaluation of the level of anxiety among Iranian multiple sclerosis fellowships during the outbreak of COVID-19. Archives of Iranian Medicine23: 283.
NguyenHCNguyenMHDoBN, et al. (2020) People with suspected COVID-19 symptoms were more likely depressed and had lower health-related quality of life: The potential benefit of health literacy. Journal of Clinical Medicine9: 965.
43.
NyagaVNArbynMAertsM (2014) Metaprop: A Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Archives of Public Health72: 39.
44.
PappaSNtellaVGiannakasT, et al. (2020) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity88: 901–907.
45.
PulvirentiFCinettoFMilitoC, et al. (2020) Health-related quality of life in common variable immunodeficiency Italian patients switched to remote assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice8: 1894–1899.
46.
QiuJShenBZhaoM, et al. (2020) A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. General Psychiatry33: e100213.
47.
RoyDTripathySKarSK, et al. (2020) Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry51: 102083.
48.
SellTKBoddieCMcgintyEE, et al. (2017) Media messages and perception of risk for Ebola virus infection, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases23: 108–111.
49.
SimKHuak ChanYChongPN, et al. (2010) Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research68: 195–202.
50.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJB, et al. (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine166: 1092–1097.
51.
TanBYQChewNWSLeeGKH, et al. (2020) Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in Singapore. Annals of Internal Medicine 173(4): 317–320.
ToppCWOstergaardSDSondergaardS, et al. (2015) The WHO-5 well-being index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics84: 167–176.
54.
TsangHWScuddsRJChanEY (2004) Psychosocial impact of SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases10: 1326–1327.
55.
WangCPanRWanX, et al. (2020a) Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17: 1729.
56.
WangYDiYYeJ, et al. (2020b) Study on the public psychological states and its related factors during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some regions of China. Psychology, Health & Medicine 30: 1–10.
57.
WilkinsonE (2020) How mental health services are adapting to provide care in the pandemic. BMJ369: m2106.
58.
WolfMSSerperMOpsasnickL, et al. (2020) Awareness, attitudes, and actions related to COVID-19 among adults with chronic conditions at the onset of the U.S. outbreak: A cross-sectional survey. Annals of Internal Medicine. Epub ahead of print 9 April 2020.
59.
WuJTLeungKLeungGM (2020) Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. The Lancet395: 689–697.
60.
XiaoHZhangYKongD, et al. (2020) The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Medical Science Monitor26: e923549.
61.
YipPSCheungYTChauPH, et al. (2010) The impact of epidemic outbreak: The case of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and suicide among older adults in Hong Kong. Crisis31: 86–92.
62.
YuanSLiaoZHuangH, et al. (2020) Comparison of the indicators of psychological stress in the population of Hubei Province and non-endemic provinces in China during two weeks during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in February 2020. Medical Science Monitor26: e923767.
63.
ZhangWRWangKYinL, et al. (2020) Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics89: 242–250.
64.
ZhangYMaZF (2020) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17: 2381.
65.
ZhouMTangFWangY, et al. (2020) Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding COVID-19 among health care workers in Henan, China. The Journal of Hospital Infection105: 183–187.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
