The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a telephone-based smoking cessation intervention for lung screening patients. Participants (N = 39) were enrolled in a single-arm pilot study of a four-session telephone-based intervention. Self-report measures were completed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Participants were long-term smokers; 62 percent were not motivated to quit. Twenty-three percent attempted quitting, 29 percent decreased their smoking, and 11 percent reported abstinence. Confidence increased (p < .001) and there were trends toward increased importance (p = .09) and comparative disease risk (p = .02). This intervention was acceptable and associated with improvements in smoking-related beliefs and behaviors.
AlbergAJFordJGSametJM (2007) Diagnosis and management of lung cancer: ACCP Guidelines (2nd edition): Epidemiology of lung cancer. Chest132(3 Suppl.): 29S–55S.
2.
American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
3.
AnLCZhuSNelsonDB, et al. (2006) Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: A randomized trial. Archives of Internal Medicine166(5): 536–542.
4.
ArnettJJ (2000) Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers. Addictive Behaviors25(4): 625–632.
5.
BattagliaCPetersonJWhitfieldE, et al. (2016) Integrating motivational interviewing into a home telehealth program for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder who smoke: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology72(3): 194–206.
6.
CarrolJKFiscellaKMeldrumSC, et al. (2008) Clinician-patient communication about physical activity in an underserved population. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine21(2): 118–127.
7.
CohenJ (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (rev. edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
CohenJ (1989) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Journal of the American Statistical Association84(408): 1096.
9.
DavisJMManleyARGoldbergSB, et al. (2015) Mindfulness training for smokers via web-based video instruction with phone support: A prospective observational study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine15(1): 95.
10.
EvansWKWolfsonMC (2011) Computed tomography screening for lung cancer without a smoking cessation program—Not a cost-effective idea. Journal of Thoracic Oncology: Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer6(11): 1781–1783.
11.
FerketichAKOttersonGAKingM, et al. (2012) A pilot test of a combined tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening program. Lung Cancer76(2): 211–215.
12.
FilippoLPrincipeRCesarioA, et al. (2015) Smoking cessation intervention within the framework of a lung cancer screening program: Preliminary results and clinical perspectives from the “Cosmos-II” Trial. Lung193(1): 147–149.
13.
FucitoLMCzabafySHendricksPS, et al. (2016) Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Cancer122(8): 1150–1159.
14.
GarcesYIYangPParkinsonJ, et al. (2004) The relationship between cigarette smoking and quality of life after lung cancer diagnosis. Chest126(6): 1733–1741.
15.
GlynnTJManleyMW (1989) How to Help Your Patients Stop Smoking: A National Cancer Institute Manual for Physicians. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
16.
GwaltneyCJMetrikJKahlerCW, et al. (2009) Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors23(1): 56–66.
17.
HagermanCJTomkoCAStantonCA, et al. (2015) Incorporating a smoking cessation intervention into lung cancer screening: Preliminary studies. Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Annual Meeting33(6): 703–723.
18.
HarrisP (1996) Sufficient grounds for optimism?: The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology15(1): 9–52.
19.
HettemaJEHendricksPS (2010) Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology78(6): 868–884.
20.
KistinCSilversteinM (2015) Pilot studies: A critical but potentially misused component of interventional research. Journal of the American Medical Association314(15): 1561–1562.
21.
KleinCHelweg-LarsenM (2002) Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health17(4): 437–446.
22.
LeonACDavisLLKraemerHC (2011) The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of Psychiatric Research45(5): 626–629.
23.
MarshallHMBowmanRVYangIA, et al. (2013) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: A review of current status. Journal of Thoracic Disease5(Suppl. 5): S524–S539.
24.
McMahonPMKongCYBouzanC, et al. (2011) Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States. Journal of Thoracic Oncology: Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer6(11): 1841–1848.
25.
MakYWLeePHLokeAY (2015) Predictors of participation in a telephone-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for smoking cessation study. BMC Public Health15: 1288.
26.
MazzoneP (2012) The rationale for, and design of, a lung cancer screening program. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine79(5): 337–345.
27.
MillerWARollnickSA (2013) Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. New York: Guilford Press.
28.
MolyneuxALewisSLeiversU, et al. (2003) Clinical trial comparing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) plus brief counselling, brief counselling alone, and minimal intervention on smoking cessation in hospital inpatients (Smoking). Thorax58(6): 484–488.
29.
MoyerVA (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine160(5): 330–338.
30.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, AberleDRAdamsAM, et al. (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine365(5): 395–409.
31.
NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2017) Cancer of the Lung and Bronchus—Cancer Stat Facts. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
32.
NoarS MBenacCNHarrisMS (2007) Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological bulletin, 133(4), 673–693
33.
ParkERGareenIFJainA, et al. (2013) Examining whether lung screening changes risk perceptions: National Lung Screening Trial participants at 1-year follow-up. Cancer119(7): 1306–1313.
34.
ParkERGareenIFJapuntichS, et al. (2015) Primary care provider-delivered smoking cessation interventions and smoking cessation among participants in the national lung screening trial. JAMA Internal Medicine175(9): 1509–1516.
35.
ParkEROstroffJSRakowskiW, et al. (2009) Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: Baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine37(3): 268–279.
36.
ParksMJSlaterJSRothmanAJ, et al. (2016) Interpersonal communication and smoking cessation in the context of an incentive-based program: Survey evidence from a telehealth intervention in a low-income population. Journal of Health Communication21(1): 125–133.
37.
ParsonsADaleyABeghR, et al. (2010) Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: Systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 340: b5569.
38.
PiñeiroBSimmonsVNPalmerAM, et al. (2016) Smoking cessation interventions within the context of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Lung Cancer98: 91–98.
39.
PozziPMunariniEBraviF, et al. (2015) A combined smoking cessation intervention within a lung cancer screening trial: A pilot observational study. Tumori101(3): 306–311.
40.
SegerstromSCMcarthyWJCaskeyNH, et al. (1993) Optimistic bias among cigarette smokers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23(19): 1606–1618.
41.
ShenTLeWYeeA, et al. (2010) Nicotine induces resistance to chemotherapy in nasal epithelial cancer. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy24(2): e73–e77.
42.
SteadLFPereraRLancasterT (2006) Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews3: CD002850.
43.
TammemagiMCBergCRileyTL, et al. (2014) Impact of lung cancer screening results on smoking cessation. Journal of the National Cancer Institute106(6): dju084.
44.
TaylorKLHagermanCJLutaG, et al. (2017) Preliminary evaluation of a telephone-based smoking cessation intervention in the lung cancer screening setting: A randomized clinical trial. Lung Cancer108: 242–246.
45.
WeinsteinND (1998) Accuracy of smokers’ risk perceptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine20(2): 135–140.
46.
WeinsteinNDKleinWM (1995) Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychology: A Journal of the American Psychological Association14(2): 132–140.
47.
ZbikowskiSMMagnussonBPockeyJR, et al. (2012) A review of smoking cessation interventions for smokers aged 50 and older. Maturitas71(2): 131–141.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
