The need for cognitive closure describes the extent to which a person, faced with a decision, prefers any answer in lieu of continued uncertainty. This construct may be relevant in lung cancer screening, which can both reduce and increase uncertainty. We examined whether individual differences in need for cognitive closure are associated with Veterans’ completion of lung cancer screening using a self-administered survey (N = 361). We also assessed whether need for cognitive closure moderates an association between screening completion and lung cancer risk perception. Contrary to our main hypothesis, high need for cognitive closure Veterans were not more likely to complete lung cancer screening and need for cognitive closure did not have a moderating role.
American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer Facts and Figures 2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
2.
CrothersKKrossEKReischLM, et al. (2016) Patients’ attitudes regarding lung cancer screening and decision aids: A survey and focus group study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society13(11): 1992–2001.
3.
De DreuCKWKooleSLOldersmaFL (1999) On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25(3): 348–362.
4.
EiserJRColeN (2002) Participation in cervical screening as a function of perceived risk, barriers and need for cognitive closure. Journal of Health Psychology7(1): 99–105.
5.
FedericoCMGolecADialJL (2005) The relationship between the need for closure and support for military action against Iraq: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(5): 621–632.
6.
KinsingerLSAndersonCKimJ, et al. (2017) Implementation of lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Internal Medicine177(3): 399–406.
7.
KruglanskiAWWebsterDM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.”Psychological Review103(2): 263–283.
8.
KruglanskiAWDechesneMOrehekE, et al. (2009) Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation. European Review of Social Psychology20(1): 146–191.
9.
LauYKCaverlyTJCaoP, et al. (2015) Evaluation of a personalized, web-based decision aid for lung cancer screening. American Journal of Preventive Medicine49(6): e125–e129.
10.
LillieSEFuSSFabbriniAE, et al. (2017) What factors do patients consider most important in making lung cancer screening decisions? Findings from a demonstration project conducted in the Veterans Health Administration. Lung Cancer104: 38–44.
11.
MazzonePJTenenbaumASeeleyM, et al. (2017) Impact of a lung cancer screening counseling and shared-decision-making visit. Chest151(3): 572–578.
12.
MoyerVA and USPSTF (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine160(5): 330–338.
13.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, AberleDRAdamsAM, et al. (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine365(5): 395–409.
14.
NeubergSLJudiceTNWestSG (1997) What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(6): 1396–1412.
15.
PreacherKJ (2015) Extreme groups designs. In: CautinRLLilienfeldSO (eds) The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1189–1192.
16.
RaglanGBBabushMFarrowVA, et al. (2014) Need to know: The need for cognitive closure impacts the clinical practice of obstetrician/gynaecologists. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making14: 122.
17.
RoetsAVan HielA (2007) Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33(2): 266–280.
18.
RoetsAVan HielA (2011) Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences50(1): 90–94.
19.
RoetsARamanEHeytensS, et al. (2014a) Effects of dispositional need for closure and training on medical decision making. Medical Decision Making34(2): 144–146.
20.
RoetsASoetensBAuEW, et al. (2014b) Personal choice: A blessing or a burden, or both? A cross-cultural investigation on need for closure effects in two Western and two East-Asian societies. International Journal of Psychology49(3): 216–221.
21.
SchapiraMMAggarwalCAkersS, et al. (2016) How patients view lung cancer screening: The role of uncertainty in medical decision making. Annals of the American Thoracic Society13(11): 1969–1976.
22.
SheridanSHarrisRWoolfS (2004) Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine26(1): 56–66.
23.
ShilohSPetelYPapaM, et al. (1998) Motivations, perceptions and interpersonal differences associated with interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among women at high and average risk. Psychology and Health13(6): 1071–1086.
24.
SkirtonH (2006) Assessing the need for certainty in users of a clinical genetic health service. Journal of Advanced Nursing55(2): 151–158.
TowleAGodolphinW (1999) Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ: British Medical Journal319(7212): 766–771.
27.
VermeirIGeuensM (2004) Need for closure, gender, and social self-esteem of youngsters. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School working paper series, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. Available at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2005-33
28.
WebsterDMKruglanskiAW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(6): 1049–1062.
29.
WebsterDMKruglanskiAW (1997) Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. European Review of Social Psychology8(1): 133–173.
30.
WienerRS (2016) Opening the black box of communication and decision-making for lung cancer screening and nodule evaluation: Implications for policy and practice. Annals of the American Thoracic Society13(11): 1887–1889.
31.
Williams-PiehotaPSchneiderTRPizarroJ, et al. (2003) Matching health messages to information-processing styles: Need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication15(4): 375–392.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
