This study examined the ways in which the meaning of ‘sexual problems’ is constructed and defined in undergraduate human sexuality textbooks. Drawing on feminist and critical discourse frameworks, the dominant as well as the absent/marginalized discourses were identified using critical discourse analysis. Sexual difficulties were largely framed by the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Thus, medical discourse was privileged. Alternative conceptualizations and frameworks, such as the New View of Women’s Sexual Problems, were included marginally and peripherally. We argue that current constructions of sexuality knowledge reinforce, rather than challenge, existing hegemonic discourses of sexuality.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
BarkerMRichardsC (2013) What does Bancroft’s Human Sexuality And Its Problems tell us about our current understandings of sexuality?Feminism & Psychology23(2): 243–251.
3.
BartkyS (1988) Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In: DiamondIQuinbyL (eds) Feminism & Foucault: Reflections on Resistance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, pp. 61–86.
4.
BassonR (2000) The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy26(1): 51–65.
5.
BassonR (2014) On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior43(7): 1225–1226.
6.
BeresMAFarvidP (2010) Sexual ethics and young women’s accounts of heterosexual casual sex. Sexualities13(3): 377–393.
7.
BrickellC (2009) Sexuality and the dimensions of power. Sexuality & Culture13(2): 57–74.
8.
CacchioniT (2007) Heterosexuality and ‘the labour of love’: A contribution to recent debates on female sexual dysfunction. Sexualities10(3): 299–320.
9.
CosgroveLWheelerEE (2013) Industry’s colonization of psychiatry: Ethical and practical implications of financial conflicts of interest in the DSM-5. Feminism & Psychology23(1): 93–106.
10.
CrawfordMMarecekJ (1989) Feminist theory, feminist psychology: A bibliography of epistemology, critical analysis, and applications. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 477–491.
11.
De LamaterJDHydeJS (1998) Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research35(1): 10–18.
12.
FerberALHolcombKWentlingT (2009) Sex, Gender, and Sexuality: The New Basics: An Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
FoucaultM (1990 [1978]) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
14.
GaveyN (1989) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 459–475.
15.
GaveyNMcPhillipsKBraunV (1999) Interruptus coitus: Heterosexuals accounting for intercourse. Sexualities2(1): 35–68.
16.
GergenKJ (1992) Toward a postmodern psychology. In: KvaleS (ed.) Psychology and Postmodernism. London: SAGE, pp. 17–30.
17.
GillR (2009) Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication3(4): 345–369.
18.
GoettschSL (1987) Textbook sexual inadequacy? A review of sexuality texts. Teaching Sociology15(3): 324–338.
19.
GoughBMcFaddenM (2001) Critical Social Psychology: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GrahamCA (2016) Reconceptualising women’s sexual desire and arousal in DSM-5. Psychology & Sexuality7(1): 34–47.
21.
HartlaubMGDreznikMT (2001) Human sexuality textbooks: A critical look at the visual presentation of sexually explicit material. Teaching of Psychology28(3): 219–221.
22.
HooksB (2000) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.
23.
JacksonSWeatherallA (2010) The (Im)possibilities of feminist school based sexuality education. Feminism & Psychology20(2): 166–185.
24.
KaschakETieferL (eds) (2001) A New View of Women’s Sexual Problems. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
25.
KrieglerSBesterSE (2014) A critical engagement with the DSM-5 and psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Psychology in Africa24(4): 393–401.
26.
LafranceMNMcKenzie-MohrS (2014) The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, overview. In: TeoT (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer, pp. 501–506.
LoeM (2008) The new view in action: College students discuss 21st-century sexuality. Feminism & Psychology18(4): 495–504.
29.
McKinlayAMcVittieC (2008) Social Psychology and Discourse. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
MarecekJGaveyN (2013) DSM-5 and beyond: A critical feminist engagement with psychodiagnosis. Feminism & Psychology23(1): 3–9.
31.
MarecekJCrawfordMPoppD (2004) On the construction of gender, sex, and sexualities. In: EaglyAHBeallASternbergRJ (eds) The Psychology of Gender (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press, pp. 192–216.
32.
MillsB (2013) The animals went in two by two: Heteronormativity in television wildlife documentaries. European Journal of Cultural Studies16(1): 100–114.
33.
MitchellKGrahamCA (2008) Two challenges for the classification of sexual dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine5: 1552–1558.
34.
MyersonM (1986) The politics of sexual knowledge: Feminism and sexology textbooks. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies9(1): 66–71.
35.
MyersonMCrawleySLAnsteyEHet al. (2007) Who’s zoomin’ who? A feminist, queer content analysis of ‘interdisciplinary’ human sexuality textbooks. Hypatia22(1): 92–113.
36.
NichollsL (2008) Putting the new view classification scheme to an empirical test. Feminism & Psychology18(4): 515–526.
37.
PeelE (2010) Chipping away at the taken-for-granted: Reflection in a sexualities course. Feminism & Psychology20(2): 225–231.
38.
RindB (1998) Biased use of cross-cultural and historical perspectives on male homosexuality in human sexuality textbooks. The Journal of Sex Research35(4): 397–407.
39.
ScullyDBartP (2003 [1978]) A funny thing happened on the way to the orifice: Women in gynecology textbooks. Feminism & Psychology13(1): 11–16 (Originally appeared in 1978 in The Cultural Crisis of Modern Medicine. New York: Monthly Review Press).
40.
SimmonsHWhiteF (2014) Our many selves. In: Erickson-SchrothL (ed.) Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource for the Transgender Community. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–23.
41.
StelzlMStairsB (2014) The construction of sexuality knowledge in human sexuality textbooks. In: PilinskaASiganporiaH (eds) All Equally Real: Femininities and Masculinities Today. Oxfordshire: Interdisciplinary Press, pp. 279-293.
42.
SungurMZGündüzA (2014) A comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 definitions for sexual dysfunctions: Critiques and challenges. The Journal of Sexual Medicine11(2): 364–373.
43.
TieferL (2001) A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now?The Journal of Sex Research38(2): 89–96.
44.
TieferL (2002) Beyond the medical model of women’s sexual problems: A campaign to resist the promotion of ‘female sexual dysfunction’. Sexual and Relationship Therapy17(2): 127–135.
45.
TieferL (2004) Sex Is Not a Natural Act and Other Essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46.
TieferL (2010) Still resisting after all these years: An update on sexuo-medicalization and on the New View Campaign to challenge the medicalization of women’s sexuality. Sexual and Relationship Therapy25(2): 189–196.
47.
UssherJM (2003) Biology as destiny: The legacy of Victorian gynaecology in the 21st century. Feminism & Psychology13(1): 17–22.
48.
van DijkTA (2003) Critical discourse analysis. In: SchiffrinDTannenDHamiltonHE (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 352–371.
49.
WodakRMeyerM (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 1–33.
50.
WoodJMKochPBMansfieldPK (2006) Women’s sexual desire: A feminist critique. The Journal of Sex Research43(3): 236–244.
51.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision. Available at: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en (accessed 21 May 2017).
