‘I’ve got a very dichotomous difference in the way that I perceive myself’: Positive and negative constructions of body image following cancer treatment

Abstract

This study investigated how women constructed body image following cancer. Four women, aged 32–67 years, who had experienced breast or bowel cancer took part in a 2-hour, in-depth focus group. Discourse analysis revealed that women orientated to positive aspects of the post-treatment body (silhouette, trust, acceptance) while acknowledging that their experiences were also traumatic (hair loss, scarring, sickness, swelling). Bodies and illness were concealed from public judgment, and women developed new trust in their bodies due to overcoming cancer; post-cancer bodies were accepted despite opportunities for normalisation. Implications for those wanting to support women during and after cancer are discussed.

Keywords

body acceptance body image bowel cancer breast cancer discourse analysis focus groups

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antaki

Widdicombe

(eds) (1998) Identities in Talk. London: SAGE.

Altschuler

Nekhlyudov

Rolnick

, et al. (2008) Positive, negative, and disparate: Women’s differing long-term psychosocial experiences of bilateral or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast Journal 14: 25–32.

Baker

(1997) Membership categorization and interview accounts. In: Silverman

(ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: SAGE, pp. 130–143.

Baucom

Porter

Kirby

(2006) Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast Disease 23: 103–113.

Boehmke

Dickerson

(2005) Symptoms, symptom experiences, and symptom distress encountered by women with breast cancer undergoing current treatment modalities. Cancer Nursing 28(5): 382–389.

Bordo

(2003) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body (10th edn). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Brandberg

Sandelin

Erikson

, et al. (2008) Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: A prospective 1-year follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 28: 3943–3949.

Brunet

Sabiston

Burke

(2013) Surviving breast cancer: Women’s experiences with their changed bodies. Body Image 10(3): 344–351.

Burwell

Case

Kaelin

, et al. (2006) Sexual problems in younger women after breast cancer surgery. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24: 2815–2821.

10.

Cancer Research UK (2017) Cancer statistics for the UK. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics#heading-Zero (accessed 18 March 2017).

11.

Edwards

Potter

(1992) Discursive Psychology: Inquiries in Social Construction. London: SAGE.

12.

Fredrickson

Roberts

(1997) Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21: 173–206.

13.

Goffman

(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

14.

Grogan

(2016) Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children (3rd edn). London: Routledge.

15.

Grogan

Mechan

(2017) Body image after mastectomy: A thematic analysis of women’s written accounts. Journal of Health Psychology 22(11): 1480– 1490.

16.

Harcourt

Frith

(2008) Women’s experiences of altered appearance during chemotherapy. An indication of cancer status. Journal of Health Psychology 13: 597–606.

17.

Holland

Archer

Montague

(2016) Younger women’s experiences of deciding against delayed breast reconstruction post-mastectomy following breast cancer: An interpretative phenomenological analysis Journal of Health Psychology, 21(8): 1688–1699.

18.

Horton-Salway

(2001) Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in talk about ME: A discursive psychology approach to illness narrative. Journal of Health Psychology 6(2): 247–259.

19.

Jefferson

(1991) List construction as a task and a resource. In: Psathas

(ed.) Interactional Competence. New York: Irvington Publications, pp. 63–92.

20.

Jeffreys

(2014) Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful Cultural Practices in the West (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.

21.

Kaiser

(2008) The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine 67(1): 79–87.

22.

Kissane

White

Cooper

, et al. (2004) Psychosocial impact in the areas of body image and sexuality for women with breast cancer: Report for The National Breast Cancer Centre, Australia. Available at: https://canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/pbi-psychosocial-impact-in-the-areas-of-body-image-and-sexuality-for-women-with-breast-cancer_504af02699ab1.pdf (accessed 23 March 2017).

23.

Little

Sayers

(2004) While there’s life … hope and the experience of cancer. Social Science & Medicine 59(6): 1329–1337.

24.

Parton

Ussher

Perz

(2016) Women’s construction of embodiment and the abject sexual body after cancer. Qualitative Health Research 26(4): 490–503.

25.

Pomerantz

Heritage

(2012) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In: Sidnell

Stivers

(eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 210–228.

26.

Potter

(1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE.

27.

Przezdziecki

Sherman

Baillie

, et al. (2013) My changed body: Breast cancer, body image, distress and self-compassion. Psycho-oncology 22(8): 1872–1879.

28.

Sacks

(1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

29.

Shildrick

(1997) Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics. London: Routledge.

30.

Silverman

Peräkylä

(2008) AIDS counselling: The interactional organisation of talk about ‘delicate’ issues. Sociology of Health & Illness 12(3): 293–318.

31.

Taylor

Lichtman

Wood

, et al. (1985) Illness-related and treatment-related factors in psychological adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer 55(10): 2506– 2513.

32.

Wallace

Harcourt

Rumsey

, et al. (2007) Managing appearance changes resulting from cancer treatment: Resilience in adolescent females. Psycho-oncology 16(11): 1019–1027.

33.

Widdicombe

Woofitt

(1990) ‘Being’ versus ‘doing’ punk: On achieving authenticity as a member. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(4): 257–277.

34.

Wilkinson

(2000) Women with breast cancer talking causes: Comparing content, biographical and discursive analysis. Feminism & Psychology 10(4): 431–460.

35.

Wilkinson

(2015) Focus groups. In: Smith

(ed.) Qualitative Psychology (3rd edn). London: SAGE, pp. 199–221.

36.

Wilkinson

(2016) Analysing focus group data. In: Silverman

(ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: SAGE, pp. 83–100.

37.

Williamson

Wallace

(2012) When treatment affects appearance. In: Rumsey

Harcourt

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 414–438.

38.

Zebrack

(2000) Cancer survivor identity and quality of life. Cancer Practice 5: 238–242.