Facial disfigurement attracts attention and evokes negative emotion, but evidence is lacking for a link between these two reactions. The present experiment (n = 29) investigated emotional and attentional reactions to photographs of people with disfigured faces. An eye-tracker was used to measure fixation on internal expressive features and on the forehead. Disfigurement to the internal expressive features invoked a stronger emotional reaction than disfigurement to the forehead. Attention in the area of disfigurement was associated with negative emotion (embarrassment, sympathy, disgust, repulsion) as well as surprise. Attention to the disfigurement, and negative emotion, was related to the trait of Disgust Sensitivity.
AckermanJMBeckerDVMortensenCRet al. (2009) A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45: 478–485.
2.
AndersonAK (2005) Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General134: 258–281.
CharashMMcKayD (2002) Attention bias for disgust. Journal of Anxiety Disorders16: 529–541.
5.
CurtisVde BarraMAungerR (2011) Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366: 389–401.
6.
GardinerMDToppsARichardsonGet al. (2010) Differential judgements about disfigurement: The role of location, age and gender in decisions made by observers. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery63: 73–77.
7.
GodoyAIshiiMByrnePJet al. (2011a) How facial lesions impact attractiveness and perception: Differential effects of size and location. The Laryngoscope121: 2542–2457.
8.
GodoyAIshiiMByrnePJet al. (2011b) The straight truth: Measuring observer attention to the crooked nose. The Laryngoscope121: 937–941.
HaliouaRLWilliamsRSTMurrayNPet al, et al. (2011) Staring and perceptions of people with facial disfigurement. Therapeutic Recreation Journal45(4): 341–356. Available at: http://js.sagamorepub.com/trj/article/view/2440 (accessed 18 July 2016).
11.
IshiiLCareyJByrePet al. (2009) Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities. The Laryngoscope119: 459–465.
12.
JowettSRyanT (1985) Skin disease and handicap: An analysis of the impact of skin conditions. Social Science & Medicine20: 425–429.
13.
KellyDJMielletSCaldaraR (2010) Culture shapes eye movements for visually homogeneous objects. Frontiers in Psychology1: 6.
14.
KrishnaS (2009) Disfigurement: Psychological impact and coping. The Open Dermatology Journal3: 54–57.
15.
KrusemarkEALiW (2011) Do all threats work the same way? Divergent effects of fear and disgust on sensory perception and attention. Journal of Neuroscience31: 3429–3434.
16.
KurzbanRLearyMR (2001) Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin127: 187–208.
17.
LangPJDavisM (2006) Emotion, motivation, and the brain: Reflex foundations in animal and human research. Progress in Brain Research156: 3–29.
18.
LawrenceJWRosenbergLEFauerbachJA (2007) Comparing the body esteem of pediatric survivors of burn injury with the body esteem of an age-matched comparison group without burns. Rehabilitation Psychology52: 370–379.
19.
MaderaJMHeblMR (2012) Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: An eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology97: 317–330.
20.
Meyer-MarcottyPGerdesABMStellzig-EisenhauerAet al. (2010) Visual face perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate in comparison to controls – An eye-tracking study. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal48: 210–216.
21.
MostSBChunMWiddersDMet al. (2005) Attentional rubbernecking: Attentional capture by threatening distractors induces blindness for targets. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review12: 654–661.
22.
OosterhofNNTodorovA (2008) The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105: 11087–11092.
23.
PondRSDeWallCNLambertNMet al. (2012) Repulsed by violence: Disgust sensitivity buffers trait, behavioral, and daily aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102: 175–188.
24.
SchallerMNeubergSL (2012) Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). In: OlsonJMZannaMP (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46. Burlington: Academic Press, pp. 1–54.
25.
ShanmugarajahKGaindSClarkeAet al. (2012) The role of disgust emotions in the observer response to facial disfigurement. Body Image9: 455–461.
26.
StevenageSVFurnessC (2008) The influence of disfigurement on conversational recall. Journal of Health Psychology13: 1113–1118.
27.
StoneAPottonA (2014) Emotional responses to disfigured faces: The influences of perceived anonymity, empathy, and disgust sensitivity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology36: 520–532.
28.
StoneAWrightT (2012) Evaluations of people depicted with facial disfigurement compared to those with mobility impairment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology34: 212–225.
29.
Van OverveldMde JongPJPetersML (2009) Digestive and cardiovascular responses to core and animal-reminder disgust. Biological Psychology80: 149–157.
30.
Walker-SmithGJGaleAGFindlayJM (2013) Eye movement strategies involved in face perception. Perception42: 1120–1133.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
