This study examines the effect of condom negotiation strategies on condom use and partner type and substance use before sex as moderators of strategy effectiveness. Women reported their daily sexual behavior during the last month. Withholding sex was more strongly associated with condom use when utilized with a non-casual sex partner. Directly requesting condom use was more strongly and using deceptive reasons to influence condom use was less strongly related to condom use during substance use. Results underscore the importance of understanding the contexts in which condom negotiation strategies are successful in order to improve HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention efforts among women.
American College Health Association (ACHA) (2014) American College Association—National Health Assessment II: Undergraduate Students Reference Group Data Spring Report 2014. Hanover, MD: ACHA.
BowlegLLucasKJTschannJM (2004) “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly28: 70–82.
4.
BroaddusMRMorrisHBryanAD (2010) “It’s not what you said, it’s how you said it”: Perceptions of condom proposers by gender and strategy. Sex Roles62: 603–614.
5.
CareyMPCareyKBMaistoSAet al. (2001) Assessing sexual risk behaviour with the Timeline Followback (TLFB) approach: Continued development and psychometric evaluation with psychiatric outpatients. International Journal of STD & AIDS12(6): 365–375.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2001) Core Measures for HIV/STD Risk Behavior and Prevention: Questionnaire-Based Measurement for Surveys and Other Data Systems. Sexual Behavior Questions Version 5.00. Atlanta, GA: CDC.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2012. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2016) HIV in the Southern United States. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services.
9.
De BroSCCampbellSMPeplauLA (1994) Influencing a partner to use a condom. A college student perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly18: 165–182.
10.
GurmanTBorzekowskiDL (2004) Condom use among Latino college students. Journal of American College Health52(4): 169–178.
11.
HarshbargerCSimmonsGCoelhoHet al. (2006) An empirical assessment of implementation, adaptation, and tailoring: The evaluation of CDC’s National Diffusion of VOICES/VOCES. AIDS Education and Prevention18(4 Suppl. A): 184–197.
12.
HightowLBMacDonaldPDMPilcherCDet al. (2005) The unexpected movement of the HIV epidemic in the Southeastern United States transmission among college students. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes38(5): 531–537.
13.
HollandKJFrenchSE (2011) Condom negotiation strategy use and effectiveness among college students. Journal of Sex Research49: 443–453.
14.
KnoblochLKCarpenter-TheuneKE (2004) Topic avoidance in developing romantic relationships associations with intimacy and relational uncertainty. Communication Research31(2): 173–205.
15.
LabouvieEBatesME (2002) Reasons for alcohol use in young adulthood: Validation of a three-dimensional measure. Journal of Studies on Alcohol63(2): 145–155.
16.
LathamTPSalesJMBoyceLSet al. (2010) Application of ADAPT-ITT: Adapting an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention for incarcerated African American adolescent females. Health Promotion Practice11(3 Suppl.): 53S–60S.
17.
MaistoSACareyMPCareyKBet al. (2002) The effects of alcohol and expectancies on risk perception and behavioral skills relevant to safer sex among heterosexual young adult women. Journal of Studies on Alcohol63(4): 476–485.
18.
MaistoSACareyMPCareyKBet al. (2004) Effects of alcohol and expectancies on HIV-related risk perception and behavioral skills in heterosexual women. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology12(4): 288–297.
19.
MisovichSJFisherJDFisherWA (1997) Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology1(1): 72.
20.
NoarSMCarlyleKColeC (2006) Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. Journal of Health Communication11: 365–390.
21.
NoarSMMorokoffPJHarlowLL (2002) Condom negotiation in heterosexually active men and women: Development and validation of a condom influence strategy questionnaire. Psychology & Health17(6): 711–735.
22.
NoarSMMorokoffPJHarlowLL (2004) Condom influence strategies in a community sample of ethnically diverse men and women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology34: 1730–1751.
23.
ParadaMCorralMMotaNet al. (2012) Executive functioning and alcohol binge drinking in university students. Addictive Behaviors37(2): 167–172.
24.
PeasantCParraGROkwumabuaTM (2015) Condom negotiation: Findings and future directions. Journal of Sex Research52: 470–483.
25.
PedersenERGrowJDuncanSet al. (2012) Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors26(3): 672–677.
26.
SalesJMLangDLDiClementeRJet al. (2012) The mediating role of partner communication frequency on condom use among African American adolescent females participating in an HIV prevention intervention. Journal of Health Psychology31: 63–69.
27.
SchmidA (2012) Assertiveness during condom negotiation among high-risk late adolescent/emerging adult couples: The role of relational uncertainty. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
28.
SealDWPalmer-SealDA (1996) Barriers to condom use and safer sex talk among college dating couples. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology6(1): 15–33.
29.
SheeranPOrbellS (1998) Do intentions predict condom use? Metaanalysis and examination of six moderator variables. British Journal of Social Psychology37(2): 231–250.
SobellLCBrownJLeoGIet al. (1996) The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Drug and Alcohol Dependence42(1): 49–54.
32.
ThomasSERandallCLCarriganMH (2003) Drinking to cope in socially anxious individuals: A controlled study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research27(12): 1937–1943.
33.
TschannJMFloresEde GroatCLet al. (2010) Condom negotiation strategies and actual condom use among Latino youth. Journal of Adolescent Health47: 254–262.
34.
TurchikJAGidyczCA (2012) Exploring the intention-behavior relationship in the prediction of sexual risk behaviors: Can it be strengthened?Journal of Sex Research49(1): 50–60.
35.
WeinhardtLSCareyMP (2000) Does alcohol lead to sexual risk behavior? Findings from event-level research. Annual Review of Sex Research11(1): 125–157.
36.
WeinhardtLSCareyMPMaistoSAet al. (1998) Reliability of the timeline follow-back sexual behavior interview. Annals of Behavioral Medicine20(1): 25–30.
