This pilot 3-month clinical trial investigated the feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of using the Track Health function of the Veterans Health Administration’s personal health record for eliciting a more positive physical activity and dietary intake lifestyle in a sample of 38 overweight and obese Veterans with prediabetes. Comparisons between baseline and 3 months post-intervention indicated significant improvements in weight, physical activity, abdominal circumference, and blood pressure. Use of a personal health record that users can identify with and find usable and useful coupled with instruction targeting critical functionalities could potentially promote healthy behavioral lifestyle changes.
ArcherNFevrier-ThomasULokkerCet al. (2011) Personal health records: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18(4): 515–522.
3.
BanduraA (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: PajaresFUrdanT (eds) Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307–337.
4.
BorsonSScanlanJBrushMet al. (2000) The mini-cog: A cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry15(11): 1021–1027.
5.
BrookeJ (1996) SUS: A “quick” and “dirty” usability scale. In: JordanPWThomasBWeerdmeesterBAet al. (eds) Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 189–194.
6.
ButrynMLArigoDRaggioGAet al. (2016) Enhancing physical activity promotion in midlife women with technology-based self-monitoring and social connectivity: A pilot study. Journal of Health Psychology21(8): 1548–1555.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States 2014. Available at: www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html (accessed 21 July 2016).
8.
CollinsonALindleyRCampbellAet al. (2011) An evaluation of an Internet-based approach to weight loss with low glycaemic load principles. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics4(2): 192–195.
9.
DomagkSSchwartzRNPlassJ (2010) Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior26(5): 1024–1033.
10.
FishbeinMAjzenI (2011) Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. London: Taylor & Francis.
11.
GalesicMGarcia-RetameroR (2011) Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making31(3): 444–457.
12.
HibbardJHStockardJMahoneyERet al. (2004) Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research39(4): 1005–1026.
13.
HoggMATerryDJ (2014) Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts. Hove: Psychology Press.
14.
HuFBVan DamRMLiuS (2001) Diet and risk of type II diabetes: The role of types of fat and carbohydrate. Diabetologia44(7): 805–817.
15.
KinsingerLSJonesKRKahwatiLet al. (2009) Design and dissemination of the MOVE! Weight-management program for veterans. Preventing Chronic Disease6(3): A98.
16.
KortumPTBangorA (2013) Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction29(2): 67–76.
17.
LipkusIMSamsaGRimerBK (2001) General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making21(1): 37–44.
NaziKM (2010) Veterans’ voices: Use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users’ characteristics, needs, and preferences. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association17(2): 203–211.
20.
Nutrition Data System for Research (2016) Nutrition Coordinating Center, Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Available at: www.ncc.umn.edu (accessed 14 June 2016)
21.
RizzoRPiccinelliMMazziMAet al. (2000) The Personal Health Questionnaire: A new screening instrument for detection of ICD-10 depressive disorders in primary care. Psychological Medicine30(4): 831–840.
22.
RothertKStrecherVJDoyleLAet al. (2006) Web-based weight management programs in an integrated health care setting: A randomized, controlled trial. Obesity14(2): 266–272.
23.
SchwartzLMWoloshinSBlackWCet al. (1997) The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine127(11): 966–972.
24.
SelimAJBerlowitzDRFinckeGet al. (2004) The health status of elderly veteran enrollees in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society52(8): 1271–1276.
25.
SeoDCNiuJ (2015) Evaluation of Internet-based interventions on waist circumference reduction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research17(7): e181.
26.
SharitJLisigurskiMAndradeADet al. (2014) The roles of health literacy, numeracy, and graph literacy on the usability of the VA’s personal health record by veterans. Journal of Usability Studies9(4): 173–193.
27.
SharpePAWilcoxSRooneyLJet al. (2011) Adherence to accelerometer protocols among women from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Journal of Physical Activity and Health8(5): 699–706.
28.
TremblayMSColleyRCSaundersTJet al. (2010) Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism35(6): 725–740.
29.
TuomilehtoJLindströmJErikssonJGet al. (2001) Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. New England Journal of Medicine344: 1343–1350.
30.
Van GenugtenLVan EmpelenPBoonBet al. (2012) Results from an online computer-tailored weight management intervention for overweight adults: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research14(2): e44.
31.
VandenbergPBergofskyLBurrisJ (2010) The VA’s systems of care and the veterans under care. Generations34(2): 13–19.
32.
WeissBDMaysMZMartzWet al. (2005) Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine3(6): 514–522.
33.
WombleLGWaddenTAMcGuckinBGet al. (2004) A randomized controlled trial of a commercial internet weight loss program. Obesity Research12(6): 1011–1018.
