We compared the psychometric properties of COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales, Fertility Problem Inventory, and Fertility Quality of Life Tool in 293 patients enrolled for assisted reproductive technology. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and Fertility Problem Inventory subscales presented higher internal consistency. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales differentiated best between its domains. Fertility Problem Inventory revealed better concurrent validity. Fertility Quality of Life Tool presented better fit. While discrimination for depression was similar between measures, Fertility Quality of Life Tool was better at discriminating anxiety. Results suggest that while all compared measures are reliable and valid in assessing the psychosocial adjustment to infertility, the choice of measure should be based according to the assessment goals.
AbbeyAAndrewsFMHalrnanLJ (1991) Gender’s role in responses to infertility. Psychology of Women Quarterly15:295-316.
2.
AartsJWVan EmpelIWBoivinJet al. (2011) Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: A validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Human Reproduction26: 1112–1118.
3.
BeckATSteerRABrownGK (1996) Beck Depression Inventory: Manual (2nd edn). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
4.
BoivinJ (2003) A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Social Science & Medicine57: 2325–2341.
5.
BoivinJAnderssonLSkoog-SvanbergAet al. (1998) Psychological reactions during in-vitro fertilization: Similar response pattern in husbands and wives. Human Reproduction13: 3262–3267.
6.
BoivinJBuntingLCollinsJet al. (2007) International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: Potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction22(6): 1506–1512.
7.
BoivinJTakefmanJBravermanA (2011) The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: Development and general psychometric properties. Human Reproduction26: 2084–2091.
8.
BriggsSRCheekJ (1986) The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality54(1): 106–148.
9.
BuntingLBoivinJ (2007) Decision-making about seeking medical advice in an internet sample of women trying to get pregnant. Human Reproduction22: 1662–1668.
10.
ByrneB (1998) Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
ChachamovichJChachamovichEFleckMPet al. (2009) Congruence of quality of life among infertile men and women: Findings from a couple-based study. Human Reproduction24: 2151–2157.
12.
ChristensenSZachariaeRJensenABet al. (2009) Prevalence and risk of depressive symptoms 3–4 months post-surgery in a nationwide cohort study of Danish women treated for early stage breast-cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment113: 339–355.
13.
CochraneBBLewisFMGriffithKA (2011) Exploring a diffusion of benefit: Does a woman with breast cancer derive benefit from an intervention delivered to her partner?Oncology Nursing Forum38(2): 207–214.
DonarelliZGulloSLo CocoGet al. (2015) Assessing infertility-related stress: The factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory in Italian couples undergoing infertility treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology36: 58–65.
16.
DonarelliZLo CocoGGulloSet al. (2016) The Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire (FertiQoL) Relational subscale: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity across gender. Human Reproduction31: 2061–2071.
17.
EisenbergMLSmithJFMillsteinSGet al. (2010) Predictors of not pursuing infertility treatment after an infertility diagnosis: Examination of a prospective U.S. cohort. Fertility and Sterility94: 2369–2371.
18.
EmeryMBéranMDDarwicheJet al. (2003) Results from a prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluating the acceptability and effects of routine pre-IVF counselling. Human Reproduction18: 2647–2653.
Frasure-SmithNLespéranceFTalajicM (1995) The impact of negative emotions on prognosis following myocardial infarction: Is it more than depression?Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association14(5): 388–398.
22.
GanaKJakubowskaS (2016) Relationship between infertility-related stress and emotional distress and marital satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology21(6): 1043–1054.
23.
GourountiKAnagnostopoulosFVaslamatzisG (2010) Psychosocial predictors of infertility related stress: A review. Current Women’s Health Reviews6: 318–331.
24.
GreilAL (1997) Infertility and psychological distress: A critical review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine45: 1679–1704.
25.
GreilALMcQuillanJSanchezD (2016) Does fertility-specific distress vary by race/ethnicity among a probability sample of women in the United States?Journal of Health Psychology21(2): 183–192.
26.
HaCohenNAmirDWisemanH (2018) Womens narratives of crisis and change: Transitioning from infertility to pregnancy. Journal of Health Psychology23(5): 720–730.
27.
HannaEGoughB (2018) Searching for help online: An analysis of peer-to-peer posts on a male-only infertility forum. Journal of Health Psychology23(7): 917–928.
28.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenM (2008) Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6: 53–60.
29.
HosmerDLemeshowS (2000) Applied Logistic Regression (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
HsuPYLinMWHwangJLet al. (2013) The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) questionnaire in Taiwanese infertile couples. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology52: 204–209.
31.
KahnJH (2006) Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist34(5): 684–718.
32.
KennyD (1979) Correlation and Causality. New York: Wiley.
33.
KeramatAMasoumiSZMousaviSet al. (2014) Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. Journal of Research in Health Sciences14: 59–66.
34.
KesslerRCAndrewsGColpeLJet al. (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine32(6): 959–976.
35.
Klonoff-CohenHNatarajanL (2004) The concerns during assisted reproductive technologies (CART) scale and pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and Sterility81: 982–988.
36.
Klonoff-CohenHChuENatarajanLet al. (2001) A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertility and Sterility76: 675–687.
37.
KvienTKHeibergTHagenKB (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): What do these concepts mean?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases66: 40–41.
38.
LancastleDBoivinJ (2005) Dispositional optimism, trait anxiety, and coping: Unique or shared effects on biological response to fertility treatment?Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association24: 171–178.
39.
LittleTDCunninghamWAShaharGet al. (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal9(2): 151–173.
40.
LopesVCanavarroMCVerhaakCMet al. (2014) Are patients at risk for psychological maladjustment during fertility treatment less willing to comply with treatment? Results from the Portuguese validation of the SCREENIVF. Human Reproduction29: 293–302.
41.
LukBH-KLokeAY (2015) The impact of infertility on the psychological well-being, marital relationships, sexual relationships, and quality of life of couples: A systematic review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy41(6): 610–625.
42.
MartinsMBasto-PereiraMPedroJet al. (2016) Male psychological adaptation to unsuccessful medically assisted reproduction treatments: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update22: 466–478.
43.
MartinsMPetersonBAlmeidaVet al. (2011) Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on womens infertility-related stress. Human Reproduction26: 2113–2121.
44.
MartinsMPetersonBCostaPet al. (2013) Interactive effects of social support and disclosure on fertility-related stress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships30(4): 371–388.
45.
MeloCGameiroSCanavarroMCet al. (2012) Does the FertiQol assess quality of life? Results from the validation of the Portuguese version of the FertiQol. Human Reproduction27(Suppl. 2): ii268–ii273.
46.
Moura-RamosMGameiroSCanavarroMCet al. (2012) Assessing infertility stress: Re-examining the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory. Human Reproduction27: 496–502.
47.
NewtonCRSherrardWGlavacI (1999) The fertility problem inventory: Measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertility and Sterility72: 54–62.
PetersonBNewtonCRRosenKH (2003) Examining congruence between partners perceived infertility-related stress and its relationship to marital adjustment and depression in infertile couples. Family Process42: 59–70.
50.
PetersonBNewtonCRRosenKHet al. (2006a) Gender differences in how men and women who are referred for IVF cope with infertility stress. Human Reproduction21: 2443–2449.
51.
PetersonBNewtonCRRosenKHet al. (2006b) The relationship between coping and depression in men and women referred for in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility85: 802–804.
52.
SalvatorePGariboldiSOffidaniAet al. (2001) Psychopathology, personality, and marital relationship in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertility and Sterility75: 1119–1125.
53.
SchmidtL (2006) Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences. Danish Medical Bulletin53: 390–417.
54.
SchmidtL (2009) Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction—What are the research priorities?Human Fertility12: 14–20.
55.
SchmidtLChristensenUHolsteinBE (2005a) The social epidemiology of coping with infertility. Human Reproduction20: 1044–1052.
56.
SchmidtLHolsteinBEBoivinJet al. (2003) Patients’ attitudes to medical and psychosocial aspects of care in fertility clinics: Findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) research programme. Human Reproduction18: 628–637.
57.
SchmidtLHolsteinBEChristensenUet al. (2005b) Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: Cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment. Human Reproduction20: 3248–3256.
58.
SladePEmeryJLiebermanBA (1997) A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in-vitro fertilization treatment. Human Reproduction12: 183–190.
59.
SladePO’NeillCSimpsonAet al. (2007) The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic. Human Reproduction22: 2309–2317.
60.
SmeenkJMVerhaakCMEugsterAet al. (2001) The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction16: 1420–1423.
61.
SpielbergerCCatalanoRDooleyD (1983) Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
62.
Statistics Denmark (2015) Vital statistics. Available at: https://www.dst.dk/en (accessed 6 October 2016).
63.
StreinerDLNormanGR (1995) Health Measurement Scales (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
StreinerDLNormanGR (2008) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
VerbergMFGEijkemansMJCHeijnenEMEWet al. (2008) Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Human Reproduction23: 2050–2055.
66.
VerhaakCMLintsenAMEEversAWMet al. (2010) Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Human Reproduction25: 1234–1240.
67.
YoudenWJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer3(1): 32–35.
68.
ZachariaeRMelchiorsenHFrøbertOet al. (2001) Experimental pain and psychologic status of patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries or ischemic heart disease. American Heart Journal142: 63–71.
69.
ZachariaeRZachariaeCIbsenHHWet al. (2004) Psychological symptoms and quality of life of dermatology outpatients and hospitalized dermatology patients. Acta Dermato-Venereologica84: 205–212.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
