Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In palliative care, a biopsychosocial-spiritual model is essential to address the patient in totality. Spirituality is often a relevant issue in such settings, yet there is a need to differentiate spirituality from religion. Spirituality in palliative care focuses on the psychological and spiritual aspects of care, helping to relieve the physical, emotional, social and spiritual distresses of the patient, family members and healthcare professionals, produced in such conditions. Psychologists, according to their ethical responsibilities, may include the assessment of their patients’ spiritual needs in therapy, as it will help to identify the patients’ values, belief systems, spiritual history, distress and needs. All patients have different needs, some may need religious/spiritual guidance, in collaboration with spiritual care workers, and others may not demonstrate needs regarding these issues. The essential is that each patient is treated as a ‘whole’, addressing his physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs.

Keywords

biopsychosocial-spiritual model holistic care palliative care psychology spirituality

Introduction

Palliative care focuses on a holistic, transcultural, comprehensive and patient-centred approach, thus supporting the biopsychosocial-spiritual model which was presented as a reaction to address the totality of the patients’ relational existence – physical, psychological, social and spiritual (Beng, 2004; Sulmasy, 2002). According to Sulmasy (2002), the expansion of the biopsychosocial model to include the spiritual concerns of patients would make healthcare professionals aware that they should attend the needs of patients as whole persons. Persons can be considered beings-in-relationship; however, illness can be considered a disruption in biological relationships, which consequently affects all the other relational aspects of a person. Thus, a genuinely holistic health care must address the totality of the patient, that is, his or her relation with the physical, psychological, social and spiritual.

Spirituality is one of the fundamental dimensions of quality of life and culture care. As such, spiritual well-being is an essential component on palliative and end-of-life care (Long, 2011). However, most research in palliative care addresses spirituality and religion together, yet spirituality is a broader belief system and not the same as religion (Richardson, 2014). Overall, spirituality can be defined as a journey of self-discovery, which allows a person to experience the transcendent meaning in life, expressed as a search for the sacred (God, nature, family, etc.), whatever gives a person a sense of meaning and purpose of life (Puchalski et al., 2004; Richardson, 2014). Spirituality is personal, but also connected with others and with the world around, moved through the search of the meaning of life (Puchalski et al., 2004).

On the other hand, religion is considered an outward expression/practice of a particular spiritual understanding or organised system of beliefs, values, codes of conduct and rituals (Koenig et al., 2001). And beliefs, in health and religion, can be reconceptualised as structure of feeling contingently associated with discursive practices and narratives (Cromby, 2012). Religion is considered a covenant faith community that can enhance the search for the sacred and promotes morality (Dollahite, 1998; Emmons and Paloutzian, 2003). It casually influences health by means of social support and improved health behaviours, enhances positive psychological states (e.g. faith, hope, inner peace), offers psychological strength for acquiring/maintaining positive health behaviours and influences health by distant healing or intercessory prayer (Oman and Thoresen, 2002).

These concepts must not be viewed as incompatible, as they include the search for the sacred; however, religion may include search for social identity or health, as well as recommend rituals to assist in this search for the sacred that are valid for that faith community (Emmons and Paloutzian, 2003; Hill et al., 2000; Zinnbauer et al., 1999). A person can be spiritual without assigning to a specific faith belief or religion, as spirituality is unique, described as the ‘inner self’, embedded in everyday and inner life, used in daily interactions and as daily support, associated with higher rates of social support and lower levels of depression, possessing different meanings to different people and changing through phases of life (Bailey et al., 2009; Bennett and Shepherd, 2012; Bush and Bruni, 2008; Edwards et al., 2010; Long, 2011; Sinclair et al., 2006).

Individuals may consider themselves neither religious nor spiritual; however, existential beliefs play an important role in every person’s life, as they relate to what means to be a human being and provide a person with a purpose or ultimate meaning, such as connection with loved ones or creative expression (Selman et al., 2007). The human person is intrinsically spiritual, as a being in relationship, and sickness is understood as a disruption of right relationships. So, the appropriate care of a dying person requires attention to the restoration of all the interpersonal and extra personal relationships that can still be addressed (Sulmasy, 2002).

This article attempts to address how an articulated psychological and spiritual support promotes a better quality of life in palliative care, namely, how a psychologist may incorporate appropriate spiritual support into psychological care.

Spirituality in palliative care

A definition of health includes not only physical, cultural, psychosocial and economic needs but also spiritual needs and not simply the absence of illness (Marks et al., 2015). Existential well-being has been considered a strong predictor of health-related quality of life (Lawler-Row and Elliott, 2009), and for many people, spiritual experiences are a source of great meaning to their lives, thus encouraging engagement in health-promoting behaviours and avoiding health-risking behaviour (Marks, 2016; Piko and Brassai, 2016). However, spiritual beliefs and experiences are far from universal (Marks, 2016). According to the Meaning-Making Model (Park, 2013), the degree of discrepancy between the perception of one’s illness from one’s global beliefs, such as identity, health and global goals, determines the extent to which the illness is distressing. In some cases, those beliefs are spiritual in nature (Park, 2013). Qualitative studies about spiritual aspects at the end of life point to three main themes: spiritual despair – alienation, loss of self, dissonance; spiritual work – forgiveness, self-exploration, search for balance; and spiritual well-being – connection, self-actualisation, consonance (Marks et al., 2015; Williams, 2006).

In palliative care, it is not uncommon to experience spiritual distress, defined as the disruption of one’s beliefs of value system (Richardson, 2014). Anandarajah and Hight (2001) suggested that spiritual distress happens when a person is unable to find sources of meaning, love, comfort and so on or when conflict occurs between beliefs and life’s events. Saunders (1978) introduced the concept of ‘total pain’, which includes physical, social, emotional and spiritual distress. In palliative care, pain is one of the most distressing symptoms patients may experience and unaddressed spiritual issues may frustrate one’s attempts to treat other symptoms and have an adverse effect on quality of life; however, if each dimension is addressed, distressing symptoms may be alleviated (Puchalski et al., 2004; Richardson, 2014; Sulmasy, 2006).

Although limited, research points to the importance of spiritual and existential issues in patients with life-threatening illness and to the close relationship between spiritual, social and psychological well-being. It has been found that spiritual issues/beliefs contributed for patients and carers to find meaning and were considered the main source of hope (Scott et al., 2003, 2004; Westlake and Dracup, 2001); spiritual well-being/striving was associated with less depressive symptoms and less negative affects (Bekelman et al., 2007; Perez et al., 2009) and greater spirituality buffered the impact of stigma on self-esteem (Noor et al., 2016). Feelings of spiritual support seem to be particularly valuable to people searching for a sense of connectedness and control in life (Zinnbauer et al., 1999), and evoking spirituality and accepting the disease, adopting a positive attitude and engaging in self-talk were considered as emotion-focused coping strategies to reframe the way patients thought about their illness (Roomaney and Kagee, 2016). It is important to note the relevance of resilience when attending palliative care patients’ emotional needs, as in palliative care resilience is referred to the ability of patients to cope with incurable illness and the derived problems (Radbruch and Payne, 2009). Interactions between spirituality, resilience, social support network and physical symptoms have been observed, namely, resilience was found to have a high predictive value for spirituality, social support network to have a direct positive effect on the interpersonal dimension of spirituality and spiritual elements to enhance the effectiveness of mindfulness for pain, suggesting that spiritual engagement may itself be a resource in managing pain (Feuille and Pargament, 2015; Fombuena et al., 2016).

Spirituality and psychology in palliative care

The view of death varies according to a person’s values, beliefs, culture and meaning of life. The important issue is that each individual may react to his or her beliefs in a unique way, and so, the health professional must address each case individually (Koenig et al., 2001; Shannon and Tatum, 2002).

In general, the religious/spiritual coping is associated with positive mental and physical health outcomes. However, if patients attempt to rely solely on their higher power for mental and physical health without any form of collaborative problem solving or if patients use negative religious/spiritual coping styles, they are more likely to have poorer long-term health outcomes (Wachholtz and Pearce, 2009). A positive religious coping is associated with a constructive reliance on faith that promotes health adaptation and psychological adjustment to stressors, as serious illness, predicting a positive spiritual support (Ai et al., 2012; Ano and Vasconcelles, 2005; Pargament et al., 2000; Phelps et al., 2009). A negative religious coping, on the other hand, tends to view illness as a divine punishment and can indicate an existential crises, therefore predicting a negative spiritual support (Ai et al., 2012; Ano and Vasconcelles, 2005; Pargament et al., 2001; Phelps, et al., 2009). So healthcare professionals’ awareness on how their patients are using their faith to cope with pain and to influence quality of life will help to identify whether specialised mental health practice would be an added benefit for pain management (Bekke-Hansen et al., 2014; Wachholtz and Pearce, 2009). Nevertheless, it is important to maintain a distinction between ‘spirituality’ and ‘religion’, as spirituality was considered part of most patients’ total existence, encompassed more than religion, does not necessarily relate to religion and patients prefer not to be judged or forced into religion (Edwards et al., 2010; Hermann, 2001; McGrath, 2003; Stephenson et al., 2003; Tan et al., 2005).

Psychologists in palliative care play a key role with respect to providing support and counsel for end-of-life patients and their family member, and other healthcare providers. Although psychologists tend to be reluctant to address spiritual issues with their patients, the ability to question patients about their spirituality is an important element in therapy, as this information frequently reveals significant data in the overcoming of difficulties (Lomax et al., 2002), allowing the use of their skills and knowledge towards the patient’s spiritual needs and to work effectively with other spiritual care workers on the palliative team (Kaut, 2002; Moss and Dobson, 2006). Spiritual issues (e.g. severe meaningless, guilt) lead to distress that causes psychological and physical suffering, such as depression, anxiety or acute pain (Puchalski et al., 2009). One leading explanation based on the mediating role of psychological well-being in the link of spirituality and health outcomes is the stress-buffering effect of goals, beliefs and meaning (Park and Folkman, 1997; Piko and Brassai, 2016).

Psychological support allows to assemble the meanings and the psychological representations and values of the spiritual and/or religious beliefs and symbols (Alleti, 2008). Narratives help make life meaningful for patients and can be understood and addressed from different clinical perspectives, therefore being fundamental for a holistic care (Mundle, 2015). ‘Narrative care’ has demonstrated therapeutic benefits of empathic listening and, when focused on spiritual care, helps clinicians understand more fully the meaning of a patient’s ‘total pain’ (Moore et al., 2015; Mundle, 2015). Hence, the personal life history is understood as how it was felt and perceived by the subject and how it fitted in his or her internal life experiences, allowing a personal understanding at many complex levels (emotional, social, motivational, cultural, etc.) and so promoting a better self-knowledge and better relational skills and allowing the search for solutions appropriate to the individual’s needs and psychological processes (Alleti, 2008), thus being more comprehensive on these matters than pastoral care that focuses on finding answers related to complex philosophical and theological questions (Hermsen and ten Have, 2004; Smyth and Bellemare, 1988).

The incorporation of spirituality into psychology care is consistent with the biopsychosocial-spiritual model from which psychologists operate – recognising their patients’ problems as multifaceted (Sulmasy, 2002), therefore addressing the patient’s unique life experiences, values and beliefs in order to maintain a sense of personal dignity (Chochinov et al., 2002).

Tan (1996) described two main models of integrating religion/spirituality into the therapeutic process: implicit and explicit integration. A clinician who adopts an implicit approach tends to hardly/indirectly initiate a conversation about spiritual matters. The spiritual issues are dealt only if identified by the patient, supporting the patient’s autonomy to mention spiritual issues in therapy or not. It focuses on the words patients use to describe their beliefs and practices in order to comprehend how that patient experiences spirituality (Griffith and Griffith, 1992). However, research indicates that many patients wish their medical practitioners addressed spiritual/religious matters (Post et al., 2000).

The explicit approach incorporates spiritual/religious issues into therapy. The clinician must be careful when conducting the assessment of the patient’s spiritual needs, as it may include the use of prayer or referral to religious groups or texts (Tan, 1996). On the other hand, there is the inclusion of forgiveness, which is common in therapy and not directly related to spirituality/religion (Richards and Bergin, 2005). It is common for palliative care patients to have access to institutionally based chaplains or spiritual care workers, who are in a position to address the more explicit techniques (e.g. rituals) that are outside the ethical bounds of a psychologist’s competence and training (Chappelle, 2000; Moss and Dobson, 2006).

The ethical appropriateness of pure explicit integration in psychology may be damaging to the therapeutic process, as this approach is likely to work best when both the psychologist and patient have similar belief systems, and in case of misinterpretation, as the palliative individual is already in a very vulnerable position, this can potentially be construed as disrespectful and paternalistic (Chappelle, 2000; Moss and Dobson, 2006). A pluralistic culture would be best served with an implicit integration, but with an added degree of directivity to provide a responsible degree of attention to the patient’s spiritual health. If a more explicit approach is needed, which may or may not fall out of the ethical and competence bounds of the psychologist, the patient can be referred to an institutionally based chaplain/spiritual care worker in the palliative care team or a religious leader within the patient’s community for counselling directly the religious concerns, which may result in a collaboration with these leaders (Chappelle, 2000; Moss and Dobson, 2006). The primary roles of the psychologist in this regard are to listen nonjudgmentally and to assist the patients in determining what actions are needed to fulfil these needs (Richards and Bergin, 2005). Ethical principles, such as respect for patient’s rights and dignity (American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, 2002); responsibility to be aware of how spiritual matters impact the patient’s life (McMinn and Dominquez, 2005); to seek appropriate consultation to religious/spiritual professionals, if needed; honesty about skills and limitations as professionals; competence awareness; and concern for others’ well-being, can greatly help the professional to approach spiritual issues (Plante, 2007). Also, appropriate education on spiritual issues evoked by patients and families faced with life-threatening illness and regular assessment of spiritual and existential needs, goals and concerns such as life review, hopes and fears, meaning purpose, beliefs, forgiveness and life completion tasks should be taken into account (American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine et al., 2004; Puchalski et al., 2009). Self-knowledge is an important component of competence and spiritual awareness (Wasner et al., 2005). Psychologists need to explore their own beliefs and attitudes to different spiritual values associated with death and dying, especially psychologists working with palliative patients, as the frequent confrontation with death involves continually being faced with one’s own mortality (Moss and Dobson, 2006). In case patients do not require spiritual or religious care, psychological support should still be crucial to counsel end-of-life patients (Lomax et al., 2002).

Conclusion

Spirituality has been identified as an important factor in the overall health and well-being in palliative care. It is understood at an individual level and can be viewed as a sense of internal peace and search of a purpose and connectedness to the sacred (Drutchas and Anandarajah, 2014).

Psychological and spiritual distress are common in end-of-life patients, and they often trigger thoughts of an accelerated death when pain and physical symptoms have been treated, as patients may become demoralised and hopeless (Moss and Dobson, 2006). This is a wide challenge for the patient, family members and healthcare team, who try to find meaning for this journey and where spirituality appears to be one of the ways to cope with this distressing experience (Scott et al., 2003, 2004; Westlake and Dracup, 2001).

In palliative care, the incorporation of spirituality into psychological care is consistent with the biopsychosocial-spiritual model (Sulmasy, 2002). According to Tan (1996), there can be an implicit or explicit integration of spirituality in psychological care. In the implicit integration, the spiritual issues are dealt only if identified by the patient (Griffith and Griffith, 1992). On the other hand, the explicit approach incorporates spiritual/religious issues into therapy; however, this may fall outside the ethical bounds of a psychologist’s ability and training (Chappelle, 2000).

A multicultural population would be best served with an implicit integration, but with an added initiative from the psychologist to address the patient’s spiritual health. In case the patient needs a more explicit religious/spiritual guidance, the collaboration of institutionally based chaplains or spiritual care workers is required (Chappelle, 2000).

In this sense, spirituality should be incorporated into psychological end-of-life care as it demonstrates cultural inclusiveness (Shafranske and Malony, 1996) and comprises the patient as a whole, promoting an appropriate response to the patient’s needs and to the dying process (Moss and Dobson, 2006). In palliative care, psychologists are essential in providing support and counsel for end-of-life patients, their family member and other healthcare providers. By incorporating a spiritual component, the psychologist gains value insight about the patient and helps to fulfil the duty of responsibly caring for the ‘whole’ person, and by allowing the person to indicate his or her spiritual issues and needs, their dignity, right for self-determination and autonomy are being respected (Moss and Dobson, 2006).

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

Hopp

Terrence

. (2012) Existential relatedness in light of eudemonic well-being and religious coping among middle-aged and older cardiac patients. Journal of Health Psychology 18(3): 368–382.

Alleti

(2008) Atendimento psicológico e direção espiritual: Semelhanças, diferenças integrações e … confusões. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 24(1): 117–125.

American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine; Center to Advance Palliative Care; Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association et al. (2004) National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care: Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, executive summary. Journal of Palliative Medicine 7(5): 611–627.

American Psychological Association (APA) (2002) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 57: 1060–1073.

Anandarajah

Hight

(2001) Spirituality and medical practice: Using the HOPE questions as a practical tool for spiritual assessment. American Family Physician 63: 81–89.

Ano

Vasconcelles

(2005) Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 61(4): 461–480.

Bailey

Moran

Graham

(2009) Creating a spiritual tapestry: Nurses’ experiences of delivering spiritual care to patients in an Irish hospice. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 15: 42–48.

Bekelman

Becker

. (2007) Spiritual well-being and depression in patients with heart failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(4): 470–477.

Bekke-Hansen

Pedersen

Thygesen

. (2014) The role of religious faith, spirituality and existential considerations among heart patients in a secular society: Relation to depressive symptoms 6 months post acute coronary syndrome. Journal of Health Psychology 19: 740–753.

10.

Beng

(2004) The last hours and days of life: A biopsychosocial-spiritual model of care. Asia Pacific Family Medicine 4: 1–3.

11.

Bennett

Shepherd

(2012) Depression in Australian women: The varied roles of spirituality and social support. Journal of Health Psychology 18: 429–438.

12.

Bush

Bruni

(2008) Spiritual care as a dimension of holistic care: A relational interpretation. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 14: 539–545.

13.

Chappelle

(2000) A series of progressive legal and ethical decision-making steps for using Christian spiritual interventions in psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Theology 28(1): 43–53.

14.

Chochinov

Hack

Hassard

. (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: A cross-sectional, cohort study. The Lancet 360(9350): 2026–2030.

15.

Cromby

(2012) Beyond belief. Journal of Health Psychology 17(7): 943–957.

16.

Dollahite

(1998) Fathering, faith, and spirituality. The Journal Men’s Studies 7: 3–15.

17.

Drutchas

Anandarajah

(2014) Spirituality and coping with chronic disease in pediatrics. Rhode Island Medical Society 97(3): 26–30.

18.

Edwards

Pang

Shiu

. (2010) The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: A meta-study of qualitative research. Palliative Medicine 24(9): 753–770.

19.

Emmons

Paloutzian

(2003) The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 377–402.

20.

Feuille

Pargament

(2015) Pain, mindfulness, and spirituality: A randomized controlled trial comparing effects of mindfulness and relaxation on pain-related outcomes in migraineurs. Journal of Health Psychology 20: 1090–1106.

21.

Fombuena

Galiana

Barreto

. (2016) Spirituality in patients with advanced illness: The role of symptom control, resilience and social network. Journal of Health Psychology 21(12): 2765–2774.

22.

Griffith

(1992) Therapeutic change in religious families: Working with the God construct. In: Burton

(ed.) Religion and the Family: When God Helps. New York: Haworth Press, pp. 63–86.

23.

Hermann

(2001) Spiritual needs of dying patients: A qualitative study. Oncology Nursing Forum 28: 67–72.

24.

Hermsen

ten Have

(2004) Pastoral care, spirituality, and religion in palliative care journals. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 21(5): 353–356.

25.

Hill

Pargament

Wood

. (2000) Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30: 51–77.

26.

Kaut

(2002) Religion, spirituality, and existentialism near the end of life. American Behavioral Scientist 46: 220–234.

27.

Koenig

McCullough

Larson

(2001) Handbook of Religion and Health. New York: Oxford University Press.

28.

Lawler-Row

Elliott

(2009) The role of religious activity and spirituality in the health and well-being of older adults. Journal of Health Psychology 14(1): 43–52.

29.

Lomax

Karff

McKenny

(2002) Ethical considerations in the integration of religion and psychotherapy: Three perspectives. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 25(3): 547–559.

30.

Long

(2011) Cultural and spiritual considerations in palliative care. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 33(2): S96–S101.

31.

Marks

(2016) Dyshomeostasis, obesity, addiction and chronic stress. Health Psychology Open. Epub ahead of print 28 March 3(1): 1–20.

32.

Marks

Murray

Evans

. (2015) Health Psychology: Theory, Research & Practice (4th edn). London: SAGE.

33.

McGrath

(2003) Religiosity and the challenge of terminal illness. Death Studies 27: 881–899.

34.

McMinn

Dominquez

(2005) Psychology and the Church. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

35.

Moore

Talwar

Moxley-Haegert

(2015) Definitional ceremonies: Narrative practices for psychologists to inform interdisciplinary teams’ understanding of children’s spirituality in pediatric settings. Journal of Health Psychology 20: 259–272.

36.

Moss

Dobson

(2006) Psychology, spirituality and end-of-life care: An ethical integration? Canadian Psychology 47: 284–299.

37.

Mundle

(2015) A narrative analysis of spiritual distress in geriatric physical rehabilitation. Journal of Health Psychology 20(3): 273–285.

38.

Noor

Bashir

Earnshaw

(2016) Bullying, internalized hepatitis (Hepatitis C virus) stigma, and self-esteem: Does spirituality curtail the relationship in the workplace. Journal of Health Psychology 21(9): 1860–1869 .

39.

Oman

Thoresen

(2002) ‘Does religion cause health?’: Differing interpretations and diverse meanings. Journal of Health Psychology 7(4): 365–380.

40.

Pargament

Koenig

Perez

(2000) The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56(4): 519–543.

41.

Pargament

Koenig

Tarakeshwar

. (2001) Religious struggle as a predictor of mortality among medically ill elderly patients: A 2-year longitudinal study. Archives of Internal Medicine 161(15): 1881–1885.

42.

Park

(2013) The meaning making model: A framework for understanding meaning, spirituality, and stress-related growth in health psychology. The European Health Psychologist 2: 40–47.

43.

Park

Folkman

(1997) Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology 1: 115–144.

44.

Perez

Chartier

Koopman

. (2009) Spiritual striving, acceptance coping, and depressive symptoms among adults living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Health Psychology 14(1): 88–97.

45.

Phelps

Maciejewski

Nilsson

. (2009) Religious coping and use of intensive life-prolonging care near death in patients with advanced cancer. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 301(11): 1140–1147.

46.

Piko

Brassai

(2016) A reason to eat healthy: The role of meaning in life in maintaining homeostasis in modern society. Journal of Health Psychology 3(1): 2055102916634360.

47.

Plante

(2007) Integrating spirituality and psychotherapy: Ethical issues and principals to consider. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63(9): 891–902.

48.

Post

Puchalski

Larson

(2000) Physicians and patient spirituality: Professional boundaries, competency, and ethics. Annals of Internal Medicine 132(7): 578–583.

49.

Puchalski

Dorff

Hendi

(2004) Spirituality, religion and healing in palliative care. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 20: 689–714.

50.

Puchalski

Ferrel

Virani

R, et al.

(2009) Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: The report of the consensus conference. Journal of Palliative Medicine 12(10): 885–903.

51.

Radbruch

Payne

(2009) White Paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: Part 1 – Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. European Journal of Palliative Care 16(6): 278–289.

52.

Richards

Bergin

(2005) A Spiritual Strategy for Counselling and Psychotherapy (2nd edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

53.

Richardson

(2014) Spirituality, religion and palliative care. Annals of Palliative Medicine 3(3): 150–159.

54.

Roomaney

Kagee

(2016) Coping strategies employed by women with endometriosis in a public health-care setting. Journal of Health Psychology 21(10): 2259–2268.

55.

Saunders

(1978) The Management of Terminal Malignant Disease (1st edn). London: Edward Arnold.

56.

Scott

Murray

Kendall

. (2003) General practitioners and their possible role in providing spiritual care: A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice 53(497): 957–959.

57.

Scott

Murray

Kendall

. (2004) Exploring the spiritual needs of people dying of lung cancer or heart failure: A prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers. Palliative Medicine 18: 39–45.

58.

Selman

Beynon

Higginson

. (2007) Psychological, social and spiritual distress at the end of life in heart failure patients. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 1: 260–266.

59.

Shafranske

Malony

(1996) Religion and the clinical practice of psychology: A case for inclusion. In: Shafranske

(ed.) Religion and the Clinical Practice of Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 561–586.

60.

Shannon

Tatum

(2002) Spirituality and end-of-life care. Missouri Medicine 99(10): 561–566.

61.

Sinclair

Raffin

Pereira

. (2006) Collective soul: The spirituality of an interdisciplinary palliative care team. Palliative & Supportive Care 4: 13–24.

62.

Smyth

Bellemare

(1988) Spirituality, pastoral care, and religion: The need for clear distinctions. Journal of Palliative Care 4: 86–88.

63.

Stephenson

Draucker

Martsolf

(2003) The experience of spirituality in the lives of hospice patients. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing 5: 51–58.

64.

Sulmasy

(2002) A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. The Gerontologist 42: 24–33.

65.

Sulmasy

(2006) Spiritual issues in the care of dying patients: ‘it’s okay between me and god’. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 296: 1385–1392.

66.

Tan

Braunack-Mayer

Beilby

(2005) The impact of the hospice environment on patient spiritual expression. Oncology Nursing Forum 32: 1049–1055.

67.

Tan

(1996) Religion in clinical practice: Implicit and explicit integration. In: Shafranske

(ed.) Religion and the Clinical Practice of Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 365–387.

68.

Wachholtz

Pearce

(2009) Does spirituality as a coping mechanism help or hinder coping with chronic pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports 13: 127–132.

69.

Wasner

Longaker

Fegg

. (2005) Effects of spiritual care training for palliative care professionals. Palliative Medicine 19: 99–104.

70.

Westlake

Dracup

(2001) Role of spirituality in adjustment of patients with advanced heart failure. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing 16: 119–125.

71.

Williams

(2006) Perspectives on spirituality at the end of life: A meta-summary. Palliative & Supportive Care 4(4): 407–417.

72.

Zinnbauer

Pargament

Scott

(1999) The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality 67(6): 889–919.

The interface between psychology and spirituality in palliative care

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Spirituality in palliative care

Spirituality and psychology in palliative care

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References