The opening sequence of an emergency call influences the efficiency of the ambulance dispatch time. The greeting sequences in 105 calls to a South African emergency service were analysed. Initial results suggested the advantage of a specific two-part opening sequence. An on-site experiment aimed at improving call efficiency was conducted during one shift (1100 calls). Results indicated reduced conversational repairs and a significant reduction of 4 seconds in mean call length. Implications for systems and training are derived.
BakerCDEmmisonMFirthA (eds) (2005) Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company, pp. 1–29.
2.
CoovadiaHJewkesRBarronP. (2009) The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. The Lancet374(9692): 817–834.
3.
GottschalkSBWoodDDeVriesS. (2006) The Cape Triage Score: A new triage system in South Africa. Proposal from the Cape Triage Group. Emergency Medicine Journal23: 149–153.
4.
GovenderKGriangerLNaidooR. (2012) The pending loss of advanced life support paramedics in South Africa. African Journal of Emergency Medicine2: 59–66.
5.
HardcastleT (2011) Issues in medicine: The 11 P’s of an Afrocentric trauma system for South Africa – time for action!South African Medical Journal101: 3.
6.
HepburnAWilkinsonSButlerCW (2014) Intervening with conversation analysis in telephone helpline services: Strategies to improve effectiveness. Research on Language and Social Interaction47(3): 239–254.
7.
HigginsJWilsonSBridgeP. (2001) Communication difficulties during 999 ambulance calls: Observational study. British Medical Journal323: 781.
8.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series125: 13–34.
9.
KooleTVerbergN (in press) Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phrase of Dutch emergency calls.
10.
LehohlaP (2006) Statistician-General Report No. 00–91–01. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa.
SacksH (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell
13.
SchegloffEA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
SunJHTwomeyMTranJ. (2012) The need for a usable assessment tool to analyse the efficacy of emergency care systems in developing countries: Proposal to use the TEWS methodology. Emergency Medicine Journal29: 882–886.
15.
WallisL (2011) Editorial: Trauma care in South Africa – A call to arms. South African Medical Journal101(3): 171.
16.
WakinMAZimmermanDH (1999) Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction32(4): 409–437.
17.
WhalenMRZimmermanDH (1987) Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly50: 172–185.
18.
WhalenJZimmermanDHWhalenMR (1988) When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems Special Issue: Language, Interaction and Social Problems35(4): 335–362.
19.
ZimmermanDH (1992) The interactional organization of calls for emergency. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 418–469.
