Social Cognitive Theory has been used to explain findings derived from focus group discussions (N = 4) held in the United Kingdom with the aim of informing best practice in personalised nutrition. Positive expectancies included weight loss and negative expectancies surrounded on-line security. Monitoring and feedback were crucial to goal setting and progress. Coaching by the service provider, family and friends was deemed important for self-efficacy. Paying for personalised nutrition symbolised commitment to behaviour change. The social context of eating, however, was perceived a problem and should be considered when designing personalised diets. Social Cognitive Theory could provide an effective framework through which to deliver personalised nutrition.
AnnasGJEliasS (2014) 23andMe and the FDA. New England Journal of Medicine370(11): 985–988.
2.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84(2): 191–215.
3.
BanduraA (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist37(2): 122–147.
4.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. London: Worth Publishers.
5.
BanduraA (1991) Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 248–287.
6.
BanduraA (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior31(2): 143–164.
7.
BishopL (2007) A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: Beyond primary/secondary dualism. Sociological Research Online12(3). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html (accessed 12 February 2013).
8.
BlossCSMadlenskyLSchorkNJ. (2011) Genomic information as a behavioral health intervention: Can it work?Personalized Medicine8(6): 659–667.
FallaizeRMacreadyALButlerLT. (2015) The perceived impact of the NHS on personalised nutrition delivery in the UK. British Journal of Nutrition113(8): 1271–1279.
11.
FischerARHBerezowskaAvan der LansI. (in press) Willingness to pay for personalized nutrition across Europe. European Journal of Public Health.
12.
GibneyMJWalshMC (2013) The future direction of personalised nutrition: My diet, my phenotype, my genes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society72(2): 219–225.
13.
GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM (2002) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th edn). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
GuillaumieLGodinGVézina-ImLA (2010) Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity7(1): 12.
HendriksHF (2013) Use of nutrigenomics endpoints in dietary interventions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society72(3): 348–351.
17.
McAlisterALPerryCLParcelGS.(2008) How individuals, environments, and health behaviours interact: Social Cognitive Theory. In: GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (eds) Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd edn). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 169–188.
MorinK (2009) Knowledge and attitudes of Canadian consumers and health care professionals regarding nutritional genomics. OMICS – A Journal of Integrative Biology13(1): 37–41.
20.
NixonCAMooreHJDouthwaiteW. (2012) Identifying effective behavioural models and behaviour change strategies underpinning preschool- and school-based obesity prevention interventions aimed at 4–6 -year-olds: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews13(Suppl. 1): 106–117.
21.
PoínhosRvan der LansIARankinA. (2014) Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries. PLoS ONE9: e110614.
22.
RonteltapAVan TrijpH (2007) Consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition. Genes and Nutrition2(1): 85–87.
23.
StaceyFGJamesELChapmanK. (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship9(2): 305–338.
24.
Stewart-KnoxBJBuntingBPGilpinS. (2009) Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. British Journal of Nutrition101(7): 982–989.
25.
Stewart-KnoxBJRankinAPoínhosR. (2015) Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: Technology push or technology pull?Proceedings of the Nutrition Society74(2): 171–176.
26.
Stewart-KnoxBKuznesofSRobinsonJ. (2013) Factors influencing European consumer uptake of personalised nutrition. Results of a qualitative analysis. Appetite66: 67–74.
27.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edn). London: SAGE.
