The aim of this study was to validate the French-language version of the Type D personality scale-14 among general and clinical populations (acute coronary syndrome and breast cancer patients). The two-factor structure of the Type D personality scale-14 was confirmed by factorial and confirmatory analyses. Internal consistency for both subdimensions of Type D personality scale-14 (negative affectivity and social inhibition) was very good with α = .87 for each. Contrary to our expectations, the Type D prevalence was much higher in the breast cancer group than in the acute coronary syndrome patients. In conclusion, the French-language Type D personality scale-14 showed good psychometric properties among general and clinical populations.
AlçelikAYıldırımOCananF. (2012) A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Type D personality construct in Turkish hemodialysis patients. Journal of Mood Disorders2(1): 1–5.
2.
AquariusAESmolderenKGHammingJF. (2009) Type D personality and mortality in peripheral arterial disease: A pilot study. Archives of Surgery144(8): 728–733.
3.
AsendorpfJB (1993) Social inhibition: A general-developmental perspective. In: TraueHCPennebakerJW (eds) Emotion, Inhibition and Health. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber, pp. 80–99.
4.
BagbyRMParkerJDATaylorGJ (1999) The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I: Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research38(1): 23–32.
BollenKA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 136–162.
8.
BuneviciusAStaniuteMBrozaitieneJ. (2013) Type D (distressed) personality and its assessment with the DS14 in Lithuanian patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Health Psychology18(9): 1242–1251.
9.
DenolletJ (2000) Type D personality: A potential risk factor refined. Journal of Psychosomatic Research49(4): 255–266.
10.
DenolletJ (2005) DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine67: 89–97.
11.
DenolletJSchifferAASpekV (2010) A general propensity to psychological distress affects cardiovascular outcomes: Evidence from research on the Type D (distressed) personality profile. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality Outcomes3: 546–557.
12.
EmonsWHMMeijerRRDenolletJ (2007) Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: Evaluating type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research63: 27–39.
13.
FergusonEWilliamsLO’ConnorRC. (2009) A taxometric analysis of Type-D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine71: 981–986.
14.
GestSD (1997) Behavioral inhibition: Stability and associations with adaptation from childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72: 467–475.
15.
GintingHvandeVenMBeckerES. (2014) Type D personality is associated with health behaviors and perceived social support in individuals with coronary heart disease. Journal of Health Psychology21(5): 727–737.
16.
GrandeGRomppelMBarthJ (2012) Association between Type D personality and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Society of Behavioral Medicine43: 299–310.
17.
HausteinerCKlupschDEmenyR. (2010) Clustering of negative affectivity and social inhibition in the community: Prevalence of type D personality as a cardiovascular risk marker. Psychosomatic Medicine72(2): 163–171.
18.
HornJL (1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika32: 179–185.
19.
HowardSHughesBM (2012) Construct, concurrent and discriminant validity of Type D personality in the general population: Associations with anxiety, depression, stress and cardiac output. Psychology & Health27(2): 242–258.
20.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
21.
KupperNPedersenSSHöferS. (2013) Cross-cultural analysis of Type D (distressed) personality in 6222 patients with ischemic heart disease: A study from the International HeartQoL Project. International Journal of Cardiology166: 327–333.
22.
MolsFOerlemansSDenolletJ. (2012a) Type D personality is associated with increased comorbidity burden and health care utilization among 3080 cancer survivors. General Hospital Psychiatry34: 352–359.
23.
MolsFThongMSYvan de Poll-FranseLV. (2012b) Type D (distressed) personality is associated with poor quality of life and mental health among 3080 cancer survivors. Journal of Affective Disorders136: 26–34.
24.
Ogińska-BulikNJuczyńskiZ (2009) Type D personality in Poland: Validity and application of the Polish DS14. Polish Psychological Bulletin40(3): 130–136.
25.
PedersenSDenolletJ (2004) Validity of the Type D personality construct in Danish post-MI patients and healthy controls. Journal of Psychosomatic Research57: 265–272.
26.
PedersenSDenolletJ (2006) Is Type D personality here to stay? Emerging evidence across cardiovascular disease patients group. Current Cardiology Reviews2: 205–213.
27.
RakotomalalaR (2005) TANAGRA: Un logiciel gratuit pour l’enseignement et la recherche. Actes de EGC 2005. RNTI-E-32: 697–702.
28.
SteigerJH (2007) Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences42(5): 893–898.
VelicerWFEatonCAFavaJL (2000) Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: GoffinRDHelmesE (eds) Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, pp. 41–71.
31.
WatsonDClarkLA (1984) Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin6: 465–490.
32.
WatsonDClarkLAHarknessAR (1994) Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology103: 18–31.
33.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54(6): 1063–1070.
34.
WengCYDenolletJLinCL. (2013) The validity of the Type D construct and its assessment in Taiwan. BCM Psychiatry13(46): 1–9.
35.
WilliamsLAbbottCKerrR (2015) Health behaviour mediates the relationship between Type D personality and subjective health in the general population. Journal of Health Psychology21(10): 2148–2155.
36.
WilliamsLCurrenCBruceG (2011) Are alexithymia and Type D personality distinct or overlapping constructs? A confirmatory factor analysis of the Toronto alexithymia and Type D scales. Personality and Individual Differences51: 683–686.
37.
WilliamsLO’ConnorRCHowardS. (2008) Type-D personality mechanisms of effect: The role of health-related behavior and social support. Journal of Psychosomatic Research64(1): 63–69.
38.
ZigmondASSnaithRP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica67: 361–370.
