Health outcomes of adults with type 1 diabetes may be affected by relationship status and quality. Our objective was to examine associations between relationship status, relationship factors, and outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes. N = 1660 participants completed surveys measuring relationship satisfaction and perceived partner support style (active engagement, protective buffering, over-protection). Differences in glycemic control and adherence for those married/partnered versus not were insignificant. Higher relationship satisfaction, and having an engaged, not over-protective, partner was associated with better glycemic control and self-care. Helping partners support patients, avoiding over-protection, may enhance relationship and diabetes-related patient outcomes for adults with type 1 diabetes.
BeckRWTamborlaneWVBergenstalRM. (2012) The T1D exchange clinic registry. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism97(12): 4383–4389.
4.
BradburyTNFinchamFDBeachSRH (2000) Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 964–980.
5.
BusbyDMChristensenCCraneDR. (1995) A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy21(3): 289–308.
6.
CaseyDMurphyKLawtonJ. (2011) A longitudinal qualitative study examining the factors impacting on the ability of persons with T1DM to assimilate the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) principles into daily living and how these factors change over time. BMC Public Health11: 672.
7.
CohenSWillsTA (1985) Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin98: 310–357.
8.
CornelisMCGlymourMKawachiI. (2012) Abstract P213: Marital status and risk of type 2 diabetes in the health professionals follow-up study. Circulation125: AP213.
9.
CoyneJCSmithDAF (1991) Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61(3): 404–412.
10.
HagedoornMKeersJCLinksTP. (2006) Improving self-management in insulin-treated adults participating in diabetes education. The role of overprotection by the partner. Diabetic Medicine23(3): 271–277.
11.
HahlKHamalainenHSimellT. (2006) The effects of type 1 diabetes and its long-term complications on physical and mental health issues. PharmacoEconomics24(6): 559–569.
12.
HallerMJAtkinsonMASchatzD (2005) Type 1 diabetes mellitus: Etiology, presentation, and management. Pediatric Clinics of North America52(6): 1553–1578.
13.
Hartemann-HeurtierASultanSSachonC. (2001) How type 1 diabetic patients with good or poor glycemic control cope with diabetes-related stress. Diabetes & Metabolism27(5 Pt 1): 553–559.
14.
HauserSTJacobsenAMLavoriP. (1990) Adherence among children and adolescents with IDDM over a 4 year longitudinal follow-up: Immediate and long-term linkages with the family milieu. Journal of Pediatric Psychology13: 527–542.
15.
HerbertTBCohenS (1993) Depression and immunity: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin113: 472–486.
16.
HinnenCHagedoornMRanchorAV. (2008) Relationship satisfaction in women: A longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners’ relationship-focused coping. British Journal of Health Psychology13(4): 737–754.
17.
JefferyRWRickAM (2002) Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between body mass index and marriage-related factors. Obesity Research10(8): 809–815.
18.
KaplanRMKronickRG (2006) Marital status and longevity in the United States population. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health60(9): 760–765.
19.
KarneyBRBradburyTN (1995) The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin118(1): 3–34.
20.
KelleyHHThibautTW (1978) Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21.
Kiecolt-GlaserJKNewtonTL (2001) Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin127: 472–503.
22.
KlausnerEJKoenigsbergHWSkolnickN. (1995) Perceived familial criticism and glucose control in IDDM. International Journal of Mental Health24: 64–75.
23.
KuijerRGYbemaJFBuunkBP. (2000)Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology19(2): 256–275.
24.
LewisMAMcBrideCMPollakKI. (2006) Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science & Medicine62: 1369–1380.
25.
LivingstoneSJLookerHCHothersallEJ. (2012) Risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes: Scottish registry linkage study. PLoS Medicine9(10): e1001321.
26.
MaahsDMWestNALawrenceJM. (2010) Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America39(3): 481–497.
27.
NathanDMSingerDEHurxthalK. (1984) The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. The New England Journal of Medicine310(6): 341–346.
28.
PensonDFWessellsHClearyP. (2009). Diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes intervention and complications research group. Sexual dysfunction and symptom impact in men with long-standing type 1 diabetes in the DCCT/EDIC. Journal of Sexual Medicine6(7): 1969–1978.
29.
PeyrotMMcMurryJFJrKrugerDF (1999) A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: Stress, coping and regimen adherence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior40(2): 141–158.
30.
PolonskyWH (1995) Besieged by the diabetes police. Diabetes Self-Management12: 21–26.
RewersM (2008) Why do people with diabetes die too soon? More questions than answers. Diabetes Care31(4): 830–832.
33.
RitholzMDAtakov-CastilloABesteM. (2010) Psychosocial factors associated with use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetic Medicine27(9): 1060–1065.
34.
SchoenbornCA (2004) Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002. Advance Data351: 1–32.
35.
SchokkerMCLinksTPBoumaJ. (2011) The role of overprotection by the partner in coping with diabetes: A moderated mediation model. Psychology & Health26(1): 95–111.
36.
SchokkerMCStuiveIBoumaJ. (2010) Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: Main and moderating effects. Journal of Family Psychology24(5): 578–586.
37.
SchwandtHMCoreshJHindinMJ (2010) Marital status, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and death among African American women and men: Incidence and prevalence in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants. Journal of Family Issues31(9): 1211–1229.
38.
SchwarzerRKnollN (2007) Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology42: 243–252.
39.
SelcukEOngAD (2013) Perceived partner responsiveness moderates the association between received emotional support and all-cause mortality. Health Psychology32(2): 231–235. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028276
40.
SobalJRauschenbachBFrongilloEA (2003) Marital status changes and body weight changes: A US longitudinal analysis. Social Science & Medicine56(7): 1543–1555.
41.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1996) Influence of intensive diabetes treatment on quality-of-life outcomes in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care19: 195–203.
42.
ToobertDJGlasgowRE (1994) Assessing diabetes self-management: The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire. In: BradleyC (ed.) Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes. Newark, NJ: Harwood Academic Publications, pp. 351–375.
43.
ToobertDJHampsonSEGlasgowRE (2000) The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care23(7): 943–950.
44.
TriefPMHimesCLOrendorffR. (2001) The marital relationship and psychosocial adaptation and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care24(8): 1384–1389.
45.
TriefPMPloutz-SnyderRBrittonKD. (2004) The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Annals of Behavioral Medicine27(3): 148–154.
46.
TriefPMSandbergJGDimmockJA. (2013) Personal and relationship challenges of adults with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative focus group study. Diabetes Care36: 2483–2488.
47.
TriefPMWadeMJBrittonKD. (2002) A prospective analysis of marital relationship factors and quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care25(7): 1154–1158.
48.
VilchinskyNDekelRLeibowitzM. (2011) Dynamics of support perceptions among couples coping with cardiac illness: The effect on recovery outcomes. Health Psychology30(4): 411–419.
49.
VilchinskyNHaze-FildermanLLeibowitzM. (2010) Spousal support and cardiac patients’ distress: The moderating role of attachmentorientation. Journal of Family Psychology24(4): 508–512.
WortmanCBConwayTL (1985) The role of social support in adaptation and recovery from physical illness. In: CohenSSymeSL (eds) Social Support and Health. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 281–302.
