In order to better understand drivers of dangerous indoor tanning behaviors, researchers developed the Comprehensive Indoor Tanning Expectations scale. To examine the longitudinal effectiveness of Comprehensive Indoor Tanning Expectations, we surveyed young women in the Southeastern United States at two time points (N = 553). The scale demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Participants who believed indoor tanning would improve their mood and afford social approval were significantly more likely to tan 6 months later, while participants who believed indoor tanning leads to psychological/physical discomfort were significantly less likely to tan 6 months later. Knowing the psychological bases for indoor tanning can inform intervention and message design.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BanduraA (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior31: 143–164.
4.
BanerjeeSCHayJLGellerAC. (2014) Quitting the “cancer tube”: A qualitative examination of the process of indoor tanning cessation. Translational Behavioral Medicine4: 209–219.
5.
BaumeisterRFVohsKDNathan DeWallC. (2007) How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review11: 167–203.
6.
BrandonTHBakerTB (1991) The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology3: 484–491.
7.
BrandonTHWetterDWBakerTB (1996) Affect, expectancies, urges, and smoking: Do they conform to models of drug motivation and relapse?Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology4: 29–36.
8.
CappellaJNRomantanALermanC (2002) Emotional Bases for Quitting Smoking: Extending the Integrated Theory of Behavior Change. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
9.
CappellaJNRomantanAPattersonF. (2006) The emotional basis for quitting smoking: Anticipated emotions as predictors of intention and behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Morbidity and mortality weekly report: Sunburn and sun protective behaviors among adults aged 18–29 years—United States, 2000–2010. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 11May, pp. 317–330.
11.
ColantonioSBrackenMBBeeckerJ (2014) The association of indoor tanning and melanoma in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology70: 847–857.e18.
12.
DerzonJHLipseyMW (2002) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In: CranoWDBurgoonM (eds) Mass Media and Drug Prevention: Classic and Contemporary Theories and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 231–258.
13.
DillardJPNabiRL (2006) The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication56: S123–S139.
14.
DillardJPShenL (2005) On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs72: 144–168.
15.
FrijdaNH (1988) The laws of emotion. American Psychologist43: 349–358.
16.
FrommeKStrootEAKaplanD (1993) Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment5: 19–26.
17.
GordonLGHirstNGGreenAC. (2012) Tanning behaviors and determinants of solarium use among indoor office workers in Queensland, Australia. Journal of Health Psychology17: 856–865.
18.
HarringtonCRBeswickTCGravesM. (2012) Activation of the mesostriatal reward pathway with exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) vs. sham UVR in frequent tanners: A pilot study. Addiction Biology17: 680–686.
19.
HayJLGellerACSchoenhammerM. (2016) Tanning and beauty: Mother and teenage daughters in discussion. Journal of Health Psychology. 21(7): 1261–1270.
20.
HeckmanCJEglestonBLWilsonDB. (2008) A preliminary investigation of the predictors of tanning dependence. American Journal of Health Behavior32: 451–464.
21.
HillhouseJTurrisiR (2012) Motivations for indoor tanning: Theoretical models. In: HeckmanCJManneSL (eds) Shedding Light on Indoor Tanning. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–86.
22.
KouroshASHarringtonCRAdinoffB (2010) Tanning as behavioral addiction. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse36: 284–290.
23.
KrickerAArmstrongBKGoumasC. (2007) Ambient UV, personal sun exposure and risk of multiple primary melanomas. Cancer Causes Control18: 295–304.
24.
LazarusRS (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
LearyMR (2007) Motivation and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology58: 317–344.
26.
LoewensteinGFWeberEUHseeCK. (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin127: 267–286.
27.
McAlisterAJohnsonWGuenther-GreyC. (2000) Behavioral journalism for HIV prevention: Community newsletters influence risk-related attitudes and behavior. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77: 143–159.
28.
MosherCEDanoff-BurgS (2010) Indoor tanning, mental health, and substance use among college students: The significance of gender. Journal of Health Psychology15: 819–827.
29.
NoarSMMyrickJGMorales-PicoBM. (2014) Development and validation of the comprehensive indoor tanning expectations scale. JAMA Dermatology150: 512–521.
30.
NoarSMMyricikJGZeitanyAE. (2015) Testing a social cognitive theory-based model of indoor tanning: Implications for skin cancer prevention messages. Health Communication30: 164–174.
31.
NolanBVTaylorSLLiguoriA. (2009) Tanning as an addictive behavior: A literature review. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine25: 12–19.
32.
PetersELipkusIDiefenbachMA (2006) The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication56: S140–S162.
33.
ProchaskaJOVelicerWFRossiJS. (1994) Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology13: 39–46.
34.
RainsSA (2013) The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research39: 47–73.
35.
SolomonLJBunnJYPiriePL. (2006) Self-efficacy and outcome expectations for quitting among adolescent smokers. Addictive Behaviors31: 1122–1132.
36.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
37.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on Artificial Ultraviolet Light (UV) and Skin Cancer (2007) The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review. International Journal of Cancer120: 1116–1122.
38.
TiceDM (2009) How emotions affect self-regulation. In: ForgasJPBaumeisterRFTiceDM (eds) Psychology of Self-Regulation: Cognitive, Affective, and Motivational Processes. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 201–215.
39.
TurkDRParrottRMartinM. (1997) Communicating safe sun practices to farm youth. Journal of Agromedicine4: 391–395.
40.
US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services.
41.
WilliamsDM (2010) Outcome expectancy and self-efficacy: Theoretical implications of an unresolved contradiction. Personality and Social Psychology Review14: 417–425.
42.
ZajoncRB (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist35: 151–175.
43.
ZeelenbergMPietersR (2006) Feeling is for doing: A pragmatic approach to the study of emotions in economic behavior. In: DeCremerMZeelenbergMMurnighanJK (eds) Social Psychology and Economics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 117–137.
