Psychosocial evaluation is recommended prior to bariatric surgery. Practice guidelines have been published on assessment methods for bariatric surgery candidates, but they have not emphasized ethical issues with this population. This review outlines ethical and professional considerations for behavioral healthcare providers who conduct pre-surgical assessments of bariatric surgery candidates by merging ethical principles for mental health professionals with current practices in pre-surgical assessments. Issues discussed include the following: (a) establishing and maintaining competence, (b) obtaining informed consent, (c) respecting confidentiality, (d) avoiding bias and discrimination, (e) avoiding and addressing dual roles, (f) selecting and using psychological tests, and (g) acknowledging limitations of psychosocial assessments.
American Psychological Association (2010) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf (accessed 25 August 2014).
2.
AshtonDFavrettiFSegatoG (2008) Preoperative psychological testing—Another form of prejudice. Obesity Surgery18(10): 1330–1337.
3.
Australian Association of Social Workers (2010) AASW Code of Ethics. Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available at: http://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201 (accessed 25 August 2014).
4.
BarnettJECooperN (2009) Creating a culture of self-care. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice16(1): 16–20.
5.
BauchowitzAUGonder-FrederickLAOlbrischME. (2005) Psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery candidates: A survey of present practices. Psychosomatic Medicine67(5): 825–832.
6.
BeckATWardCHMendelsonM. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry4(6): 561–571.
7.
Bejciy-SpringSM (2008) RESPECT: A model for the sensitive treatment of the bariatric patient. Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care3(1): 47–56.
8.
Ben-PorathYSTellegenAPearsonN (2008) MMPI-2-RF: Manual for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
BrandonARPuzziferriNSadlerJZ (2010) Stuck in the middle: What should a good society do?The American Journal of Bioethics10(12): 18–20.
10.
BreznikarBDinevskiD (2009) Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: Pre-operative assessment, surgical techniques and post-operative monitoring. Journal of International Medical Research37(5): 1632–1645.
BrunsDDisorbioJ (2003) Battery for Health Improvement 2 Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
13.
BuchwaldHOienDM (2013) Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obesity Surgery23(4): 427–436.
14.
BuchwaldHAvidorYBraunwaldE. (2004) Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association292(14): 1724–1737.
CanianoDA (2009) Ethical issues in pediatric bariatric surgery (Abstract). Seminars in Pediatric Surgery18(3): 186–192.
17.
ChangSHStollCRSongJ. (2013) The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surgery. Epub ahead of print 18December2013. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654.
18.
College of Alberta Psychologists (2005) The control and use of tests by psychologists, Alberta, Canada.
19.
CorsicaJAAzarbadLMcGillK. (2010) The Personality Assessment Inventory: Clinical utility, psychometric properties, and normative data for bariatric surgery candidates. Obesity Surgery20(6): 722–731.
20.
De VilleK (2010) Bariatric surgery, ethical obligation, and the life cycle of medical innovation. The American Journal of Bioethics10(12): 22–24.
21.
DixonJBLogueJKomesaroffPA (2013) Promises and ethical pitfalls of surgical innovation: The case of bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery23: 1698–1702.
22.
Dziurowicz-KozlowskaAHWierzbickiZLisikW. (2006) The objective of psychological evaluation in the process of qualifying candidates for bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery16(2): 196–202.
23.
Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society (2009) Code of Ethics and Conduct: Guidance Published by the Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Leicester: The British Psychological Society. Available at: http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/documents/code_of_ethics_and_conduct.pdf (accessed 25 August 2014).
24.
FabricatoreANCrerandCEWaddenTA. (2006) How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results. Obesity Surgery16(5): 567–573.
25.
FlumDRKhanTVDellingerEP (2007) Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association298(12): 1442–1444.
26.
FriedMYumukVOppertJM. (2014) Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery24(1): 42–55.
27.
FriedmanKEApplegateKLGrantJ (2007) Who is adherent with preoperative psychological treatment recommendations among weight loss surgery candidates?Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases3(3): 376–382.
28.
GarbJWelchGZagarinsS. (2009) Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: A meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obesity Surgery19(10): 1447–1455.
29.
GolombBAKoperskiS (2010) Pondering the ponderous: Are the “moral challenges” of bariatric surgery morally challenged?The American Journal of Bioethics10(12): 24–26.
30.
GreenbergISoggSPernaFM (2009) Behavioral and psychological care in weight loss surgery: Best practice update. Obesity17(5): 880–884.
31.
GrotheKBDubbertPMO’jileJR (2006) Psychological assessment and management of the weight loss surgery patient. American Journal of the Medical Sciences331(4): 201–206.
32.
Groth-MarnatG (2009) Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
HallBJHoodMMNackersLM. (2013) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in bariatric surgery candidates. Psychological Assessment25(1): 294–299.
34.
HeinbergLJAshtonKWindoverA (2010) Moving beyond dichotomous psychological evaluation: The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System for weight loss surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases6(2): 185–190.
35.
HofmannB (2010) The encompassing ethics of bariatric surgery. The American Journal of Bioethics10(12): W1–W2.
36.
JamesJWHaleyWE (1995) Age and health bias in practicing clinical psychologists. Psychology and Aging10(4): 610–616.
KinzlJFSchratteneckerMTrawegerC. (2006) Psychosocial predictors of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery16(12): 1609–1614.
39.
LauDC (2007) Synopsis of the 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children. Canadian Medical Association Journal176(8): 1103–1106.
LivhitsMMercadoCYermilovI. (2011) Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery? A systematic review. Obesity Reviews12(2): 142–148.
42.
LivhitsMMercadoCYermilovI. (2012) Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: Systematic review. Obesity Surgery22(1): 70–89.
43.
McDanielSHBelarCDSchroederC. (2002) A training curriculum for professional psychologists in primary care. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice33(1): 65–72.
MarekRJBen-PorathYSWindoverA. (2013) Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restruc-tured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Obesity Surgery23(11): 1864–1873.
46.
MauriMRucciPCalderoneA. (2008) Axis I and II disorders and quality of life in bariatric surgery candidates. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry69(2): 295–301.
47.
Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (2014) Resources for Optimal Care of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Patient 2014. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip/stan-dards (accessed 25 August 2014).
48.
MichalskyMReichardKIngeT. (2012) ASMBS pediatric committee best practice guidelines. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases8(1): 1–7.
MitchellJEDe ZwaanM (2012) Psychosocial Assessment and Treatment of Bariatric Surgery Patients. New York: Routledge.
51.
MitkaM (2003) Surgery for obesity: Demand soars amid scientific, ethical questions. Journal of the American Medical Association289(14): 1761–1762.
52.
MunozDJChenEFischerS. (2007) Considerations for the use of the Beck Depression Inventory in the assessment of weight-loss surgery seeking patients. Obesity Surgery17(8): 1097–1101.
53.
NeffKLe RouxC (2013) Bariatric surgery: A best practice article. Journal of Clinical Pathology66(2): 90–98.
54.
NeffKOlbersTLe RouxC (2013) Bariatric surgery: The challenges with candidate selection, individualizing treatment and clinical outcomes. BMC Medicine11(1): 8.
OlbrischME (1996) Ethical issues in psychological evaluation of patients for organ transplant surgery. Rehabilitation Psychology41(1): 53–71.
57.
PadwalRKlarenbachSWiebeN. (2011) Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obesity Reviews12(8): 602–621.
58.
PadwalRSSharmaAM (2009) Treating severe obesity: Morbid weights and morbid waits. Canadian Medical Association Journal181(11): 777–778.
59.
PapasRKBelarCDRozenskyRH (2004) The practice of clinical health psychology: Professional issues. In: BollTJFrankRGBaumA. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology: Models and Perspectives in Health Psychology, vol. 3. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 293–319.
60.
PetrichBE (2000) Medical and nursing student’s perceptions of obesity. Journal of Addictions Nursing12(1): 3–16.
61.
PontiroliAEMorabitoA (2011) Long-term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Annals of Surgery253(3): 484–487.
62.
PuhlRBrownellKD (2001) Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research9(12): 788–805.
63.
PullCB (2010) Current psychological assessment practices in obesity surgery programs: What to assess and why. Current Opinion in Psychiatry23(1): 30–36.
64.
RansomDAshtonKWindoverA. (2010) Internal consistency and validity assessment of SCL-90-R for bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases6(6): 622–627.
65.
RaperSESarwerDB (2008) Informed consent issues in the conduct of bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases4(1): 60–68.
ReynoldsLRRosenthalMS (2010) Are we providing ethical care for the severely obese?Southern Medical Journal103(6): 498–499.
68.
SaarniSIAnttilaHSaarniSE. (2011) Ethical issues of obesity surgery—A health technology assessment. Obesity Surgery21(9): 1469–1476.
69.
SabinJFanelliRFlahertyH. (2005) Best practice guidelines on informed consent for weight loss surgery patients. Obesity Research13(2): 250–253.
70.
SantryHPLauderdaleDSCagneyKA. (2007) Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. Annals of Surgery245(1): 59–67.
71.
SarwerDBWaddenTAFabricatoreAN (2005) Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of bariatric surgery. Obesity Research13(4): 639–648.
72.
SchwartzMBChamblissHONBrownellKD. (2003) Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obesity Research11(9): 1033–1039.
73.
SjöströmLPeltonenMJacobsonP. (2014) Association of bariatric surgery with long-term remission of type 2 diabetes and with microvascular and macrovascular complica-tions. Journal of the American Medical Association311(22): 2297–2304.
74.
SnyderAG (2009) Psychological assessment of the patient undergoing bariatric surgery. The Oschner Journal9(3): 144–148.
75.
SockalingamSHawaRWnukS. (2011) Weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: A systematic review of psychosocial predictors. Current Psychiatry Reviews7(3): 226–233.
76.
SoggS (2012) Assessment of bariatric surgery candidates: The clinical interview. In: MitchellJEde ZwaanM (eds) Psychosocial Assessment and Treatment of Bariatric Surgery Patients. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–36.
77.
SoggSMoriDL (2008) Revising the Boston Interview: Incorporating new knowledge and experience. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases4(3): 455–463.
78.
TarescavageAMWygantDBBoutacoffLI. (2013) Reliability, validity, and utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of bariatric surgery candidates. Psychological Assessment25(4): 1179–1194.
79.
TiceJAKarlinerLWalshJ. (2008) Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. American Journal of Medicine121(10): 885–893.
80.
WaddenTADidieE (2003) What’s in a name? Patients’ preferred terms for describing obesity. Obesity Research11(9): 1140–1146.
81.
WaddenTASarwerDB (2006) Behavioral assessment of candidates for bariatric surgery: A patient-oriented approach. Obesity14(S3): 53S–62S.
82.
WalfishSVanceDFabricatoreAN (2007) Psychological evaluation of bariatric surgery applicants: Procedures and reasons for delay or denial of surgery. Obesity Surgery17(12): 1578–1583.
83.
WalfishSWiseEAStreinerDL (2008) Limitations of the Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic (MBMD) with bariatric surgical candidates. Obesity Surgery18(10): 1318–1322.
84.
WeeCCHamelMBApovianCM. (2013) Expectations for weight loss and willingness to accept risk among patients seeking weight loss surgery. JAMA Surgery148(3): 264–271.
85.
WeeCCJonesDBDavisRB. (2006) Understanding patients’ value of weight loss and expectations for bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery16(4): 496–500.
86.
WeeCCPrattJSFanelliR. (2009) Best practice updates for informed consent and patient education in weight loss surgery. Obesity17(5): 885–888.
87.
West-SmithLSoggS (2010) Creating a credential for bariatric behavioral health professionals: Potential benefits, pitfalls, and provider opinion. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases6(6): 695–701.
