The purpose of this study was to test an intervention to increase mammography screening in women 51–75 years of age who had not received a mammogram in the last 15 months. A total of 1681 women were randomized to (1) a mailed tailored interactive DVD, (2) a computer-tailored telephone counseling, or (3) usual care. Women with income below US$75,000 who were in the interactive DVD group had significantly more mammograms than women in usual care. Women with income above US$75,000 had significantly fewer mammograms than women with income less than US$75,000 regardless of group. Further investigation is needed to understand why women with income above US$75,000 did not show the same benefit of the intervention.
AvisNESmithKWLinkCL. (2004) Increasing mammography screening among women over age 50 with a videotape intervention. Preventive Medicine39: 498–506.
2.
BodurthaJQuillinJMTracyKA. (2009) Mammography screening after risk-tailored messages: The women improving screening through education and risk assessment (WISER) randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Women’s Health18: 41–47.
3.
BreenNCroninKAMeissnerHI. (2007) Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern?Cancer109: 2405–2409.
4.
ChampionVL (1991) The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older. Oncology Nursing Forum18: 733–739.
5.
ChampionVLHusterG (1995) Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoption. Journal of Behavioral Medicine18: 169–187.
6.
ChampionVLSkinnerCS (2003) Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. Journal of Women’s Health12: 277–286.
7.
ChampionVLMarajMHuiS. (2003) Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Preventive Medicine36: 150–158.
8.
ChampionVLMonahanPOSpringstonJK. (2008) Measuring mammography and breast cancer beliefs in African American Women. Journal of Health Psychology13: 827–837.
9.
ChampionVLRayDWHeilmanDK. (2000) A tailored intervention for mammography among low-income African-American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology18: 1–13.
10.
ChampionVLSkinnerCSHuiS. (2007) The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence. Patient Education and Counseling65: 416–423.
11.
ChampionVLSkinnerCSMenonU. (2002) Comparison of tailored mammography interventions at two months post intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine24: 211–218.
12.
ChampionVLSpringstonJKZollingerTW. (2006) Comparison of three interventions to increase mammography screening in low income African American women. Cancer Detection and Prevention30: 535–544.
13.
CostanzaMEStoddardAMLuckmannR. (2000) Promoting mammography: Results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine19: 39–46.
14.
FoxS (2011) Profiles of health information seekers. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Research Internet Project, Washington, DC, USA, 1 February.
KingESRimerBKSeayJ. (1994) Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: Is it effective?American Journal of Public Health84: 104–106.
17.
LiermanLMKasprzykDBenolielJQ (1991) Understanding adherence to breast self-examination in older women. Western Journal of Nursing Research13: 46–66.
18.
NoarSMBenacCNHarrisMS (2007) Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin133: 673–693.
19.
ProchaskaJJSpringBNiggCR (2008) Multiple health behavior change research: An introduction and overview. Preventive Medicine46: 281–285.
20.
ResnicowKStrecherVCouperM. (2010) Methodologic and design issues in patient-centered e-health research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine38: 98–102.
21.
RimerBKDavisSWEngstromPF. (1988) Some reasons for compliance and noncompliance in a health maintenance organization breast cancer screening program. Journal of Compliance in Health Care3: 103–114.
22.
RimerBKHalabiSSugg SkinnerC. (2002) Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months. American Journal of Preventive Medicine22: 247–257.
23.
SaywellRMJrChampionVLSkinnerCS. (2004) A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. Journal of Women’s Health13: 909–918.
24.
SchechterCVanchieriCFCroftonC (1990) Evaluating women’s attitudes and perceptions in developing mammography promotion messages. Public Health Reports105: 253–257.
25.
SennS (1994) Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine13: 1715–1726.
26.
SiegelRWardEBrawleyO. (2011) Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians61: 212–236.
27.
SkinnerCSArfkenCLSykesRK (1998) Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine14: 54–63.
28.
SkinnerCSBuchananAChampionV. (2011) Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Patient Education and Counseling85: 308–312.
29.
SkinnerCSCampbellMKRimerBK. (1999) How effective is tailored print communication?Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine21: 290–298.
30.
SkinnerCSStrecherVJHospersH (1994) Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference?American Journal of Public Health84: 43–49.
31.
SohlSJMoyerA (2007) Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine45: 252–261.
32.
TaplinSHMontanoDE (1993) Attitudes, age, and participation in mammographic screening: A prospective analysis. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice6: 13–23.
33.
VernonSWBartholomewLKMcQueenA. (2011) A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: Sometimes more is just the same. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine41: 284–299.
34.
VernonSWLavilleEAJacksonGL (1990) Participation in breast screening programs: A review. Social Science & Medicine30: 1107–1118.
