Growing evidences highlight the co-existence of negative and positive (e.g. posttraumatic growth) identity changes following stroke. Identity changes were assessed by comparing 42 survivors 21 months after stroke and healthy controls. A total of 26 stroke survivors participated in a semi-structured interview. Stroke survivors showed significantly higher posttraumatic growth (F(1, 75) = 9.79, p = .003) and integrated the critical life event to a higher extent into their identity (event centrality) (F(1, 74) = 37.54, p < .001). Qualitative analysis revealed increased appreciation of life and more intense/selective relationships as the most common positive changes. Considering positive changes might provide additional perspectives for rehabilitation.
AffleckGTennenHCroogS (1987) Causal attributions, perceived benefits, and morbidity after a heart attack: An 8 year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology55: 29–35.
2.
AndrykowskiMABradyMJHuntJW (1993) Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: Cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psycho-Oncology2: 261–276.
3.
BargerSD (2012) Perceived emotional support and frequent social contacts are associated with greater knowledge of stroke warning signs: Evidence from two cross-sectional US population surveys. Journal of Health Psychology17(2): 169–178.
4.
BerntsenDRubinDC (2006) The centrality of event scale: A measure of integrating a trauma into one’s identity and its relation to post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy44: 219–231.
5.
BoalsASchuettlerD (2011) A double-edged sword: Event centrality, PTSD and posttraumatic growth. Applied Cognitive Psychology25: 817–822.
6.
BöckerMEberleNWirtzM, et al. (2009) Entwicklung und erste Validierung der Aachener Funktionsfähigkeits-Itembank. Paper presented at the 18. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium: Innovation in der Rehabilitation: Kommunikation und Vernetzung, Münster, Germany, 10 March.
7.
CalhounLGTedeschiRG (2004) The foundations of posttraumatic growth: New considerations. Psychological Inquiry15(1): 93–102.
8.
Ch’ngAMFrenchDMcleanN (2008) Coping with the challenges of recovery from stroke: Long term perspectives of stroke support group members. Journal of Health Psychology13: 1136–1146.
9.
CoetzerR (2008) Holistic neuro-rehabilitation in the community: Is identity a key issue?Neuropsychological Rehabilitation18(5–6): 766–783.
10.
Collicutt McGrathJLinleyA (2006) Post-traumatic growth in acquired brain injury: A preliminary small scale study. Brain Injury20(7): 767–773.
11.
CordovaMJCunninghamLLCCarlsonCR. (2001) Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study. Health Psychology20: 176–185.
12.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsonRJ. (1985) The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49(1): 71–75.
13.
DoeringBKExnerC (2011) Combining neuropsychological and cognitive-behavioral approaches for treating of psychological sequelae of acquired brain injury. Current Opinion in Psychiatry24: 156–161.
14.
EfronBTibshiraniR (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
15.
Ellis-HillCSHornS (2000) Change in identity and self-concept: A theoretical approach to recovery following a stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation14: 279–287.
16.
ErdfelderEFaulFBuchnerA (1996) GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers28(1): 1–11.
17.
EssueBMHackettMLLiQ. (2012) How are household economic circumstances affected after a stroke? The Psychosocial Outcomes in StrokE (POISE) study. Stroke43: 3110–3113.
18.
FieldENormanPBartonJ (2008) Cross-sectional and prospective associations between cognitive appraisals and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms following stroke. Behaviour Research and Therapy46: 62–70.
19.
FleissJL (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley.
20.
GangstadBNormanPBartonJ (2009) Cognitive processing and posttraumatic growth after stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology54: 69–75.
21.
GillenG (2005) Positive consequences of surviving a stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy59: 346–350.
22.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
23.
GroleauJMCalhounLGCannA. (2013) The role of centrality of events in posttraumatic distress and posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy5(5): 477–483.
24.
HautzingerMBailerM (1993) Die allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS). Weinheim: Beltz Test Verlag.
25.
HawleyCAJosephS (2008) Predictors of positive growth after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study. Brain Injury22(5): 427–435.
26.
HeineSJProulxTVohsKD (2006) The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review10(2): 88–110.
27.
HelgesonVSReynoldsKATomichPL (2006) A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology74: 797–816.
28.
Janoff-BulmanR (1992) Shattered Assumptions. New York: Free Press.
29.
KnaevelsrudCLiedlAMaerckerA (2010) Posttraumatic growth, optimism and openness as outcomes of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for posttraumatic stress reactions. Journal of Health Psychology15: 1030–1038.
30.
KuenemundAZwickSDoeringBK. (2013) Decline in attainability of communion and agency life goals over two years following acquired brain injury and the impact on subjective well-being. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation23(5): 678–697.
31.
LelorainSTessierPFlorinA. (2012) Posttraumatic growth in long term breast cancer survivors: Relation to coping, social support and cognitive processing. Journal of Health Psychology17: 627–639.
32.
LinleyPAJosephS (2004) Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress17: 11–21.
33.
McGrathJ (2004) Beyond restoration to transformation: Positive outcomes in the rehabilitation of acquired brain injury. Clinical Rehabilitation18: 767–775.
34.
MaerckerALangnerR (2001) Posttraumatic personal growth: Validation of German versions of two questionnaires. Diagnostica47(3): 153–162.
35.
MaerckerAZoellnerT (2004) The Janus face of self-perceived growth: Toward a two-component model of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry15: 41–48.
36.
MuenchbergerHKendallENealR (2008) Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: A dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury22(12): 979–992.
37.
MylesSM (2004) Understanding and treating loss of sense of self following brain injury: A behavior analytic approach. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy4(3): 487–504.
38.
NochiM (2000) Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Social Science & Medicine51(12): 1795–1804.
39.
ProulxTHeineSJ (2006) Death and black diamonds: Meaning, mortality, and the meaning maintenance model. Psychological Inquiry17(4): 309–318.
40.
SilvaJOwnsworthTShieldsC. (2011) Enhanced appreciation of life following acquired brain injury: Posttraumatic growth at 6 months postdischarge. Brain Impairment12: 93–104.
41.
SmithCP (2000) Content analysis and narrative analysis. In: ReisHTJuddCM (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–335.
42.
StewartTLChipperfieldJGRaymondPP. (2014) Attributing heart attack and stroke to ‘old age’: Implications for subsequent health outcomes among older adults. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 24February. DOI: 10.1177/1359105314521477.
43.
SumallaECOchoaCBlancoI (2009) Posttraumatic growth in cancer: Reality or illusion?Clinical Psychology Review29: 24–33.
TomichPLHelgesonVSNowak VacheEJ (2005) Perceived growth and decline following breast cancer: A comparison to age-matched controls 5-years later. Psycho-Oncology14: 1018–1029.
