Companies, seen as social communities, are major health promotion contexts. However, health promotion in the work setting is often less successful than intended. An optimal adjustment to the organisational context is required. Knowledge of which organisation-specific factors are relevant to health promotion is scarce. A Delphi procedure is used to identify these factors. The aim is to contribute to more effective workplace health promotion. The identified factors are described and embedded into a practical methodology (Intervention Mapping). A systematic use of these factors (called ‘Organisational Mapping’) is likely to contribute to more effective health promotion in the work setting.
BartholomewLKParcelGSKokG, et al. (2011) Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BrugJOenemaAFerreiraI (2005) Theory, evidence and intervention mapping to improve behavioral nutrition and physical activity interventions. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity2: 2.
3.
BurtonJ (2010) WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model: Background and Supporting Literature and Practices. Geneva: WHO.
4.
CoxTTarisTWNielsenK (2010) Organisational interventions: Issues and challenges. Work and Stress24(3): 217–218.
5.
DurlakJADuPreEP (2008) Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology41(3–4): 327–350.
HoeymansNVan LoonAJMSchoemakerCG (2012) Ontwerprapport Volksgezondheid Toekomstverkenning: Design of the Nation Public Health Status and Forecast 2014. Bilthoven: RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
8.
JainALekaSZwetslootG (2011) Corporate social responsibility and psychosocial risk management in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics101(4): 619–633.
9.
JohansonUAhonenGRoslenderR (2007) Work Health and Management Control. Stockholm: Thomson Fakta.
10.
KarasekRATheorellT (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
11.
KwakLKremersSPJVan BaakMA, et al. (2006) Participation rates in worksite-based intervention studies: Health promotion context as a crucial quality criterion. Health Promotion International21(1): 66–69.
12.
LoeppkeR (2008) The value of health and the power of prevention. International Journal of Workplace Health Management1(2): 95–108.
13.
NielsenKRandallR (2009) Managers’ active support when implementing teams: The impact on employee well-being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being1(3): 374–390.
14.
NielsenKRandallRHoltenAL, et al. (2010a) Conducting organisational-level occupational health interventions: What works?Work and Stress24(3): 234–259.
15.
NielsenKTarisTWCoxT (2010b) The future of organisational interventions: Addressing the challenges of today’s organisations. Work and Stress24(3): 219–233.
16.
Oude HengelKMJolingCIProperKI, et al. (2010) A worksite prevention program for construction workers: Design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health10: 336.
17.
Oude HengelKMJolingCIProperKI, et al. (2011) Intervention Mapping as a framework for developing an intervention at the worksite for older construction workers. American Journal of Health Promotion26(1): e1–e10.
18.
PayneNJonesFHarrisPR (2013) Employees’ perception of the impact of work on health behaviours. Journal of Health Psychology18(7): 887–899.
19.
ProperKIde BruyneMCHildebrandtVH, et al. (2004) Costs, benefits and effectiveness of worksite physical activity counseling from the employer’s perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health30(1): 36–46.
20.
ReavleyNLivingstonJBuchbinderR, et al. (2012) Identifying and understanding the concerns of business: A systematic approach to the development of the Australian WorkHealth Program – Arthritis. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy17(3): 164–172.
21.
RobroekSJWVan LentheFJVan EmpelenP, et al. (2009) Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity6: 26.
22.
RooseveltLKHollandKJHiserJ, et al. (2013) Psychometric assessment of the health care alliance questionnaire with women in prenatal care. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 22October. DOI: 10.1177/1359105313506027.
23.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
24.
Van ScheppingenARBakenNHGZwetslootGIJM, et al. (2012) A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from the Netherlands. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting16(4): 302–319.
25.
VerbeekJPulliainenMKankaanpääE (2009) A systematic review of occupational safety and health business cases. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health35(6): 403–412.
26.
Von der GrachtHA (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change79(8): 1525–1536.
27.
WendelMLBurdineJNMcLeroyKR, et al. (2009) Community capacity: Theory and application. In: DiClementeRJCrosbyRAKeglerMC (eds) Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 277–302.
WierengaDEngbersLHVan EmpelenP, et al. (2012) The design of a real-time formative evaluation of the implementation process of lifestyle interventions at two worksites using a 7-step strategy (BRAVO@Work). BMC Public Health12(1): 619.
30.
ZwetslootGIJMVan ScheppingenAR (2007) Towards a strategic business case for health management. In: JohansonUAhonenGRoslenderR (eds) Work Health and Management Control. Stockholm: Thomson Fakta, pp. 183–213.
31.
ZwetslootGIJMVan ScheppingenARDijkmanAJ, et al. (2010) The organizational benefits of investing in workplace health. International Journal of Workplace Health Management3(2): 143–159.
