Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article develops a topological approach derived from Kurt Lewin to analyse the psychological life space/s produced in a mental health service user’s home. Drawing on arguments that space plays an important part in the organisation and management of mental distress, photographs of a service user’s home are analysed as topological spaces. The article argues that topological theory can contribute to community health psychology through framing psychological distress as spatially distributed, meaning individual bodies, environments and action are conceptualised as equally contributing to the organisation and management of health-related experience and activity.

Keywords

community health psychology context distress methodology psychological theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

(2012) Memory and mathesis: For a topological approach to psychology. Theory, Culture & Society 29(4–5): 137–164.

Callard

(2004) Repressed spaces: The poetics of agoraphobia. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 127–129.

Dixon

Durrheim

(2004) Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 455–473.

Gesler

(2003) Healing Places. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hodgetts

Radley

Chamberlain

, et al. (2007) Health inequalities and homelessness: Considering material, spatial and relational dimensions. Journal of Health Psychology 12(5): 709–725.

Hurdley

(2007) Focal points: Framing material culture and visual data. Qualitative Research 7(3): 355–374.

Lewin

(1936) Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Massey

(2005) For Space. London: SAGE.

Massumi

(2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

10.

Needham

(2011) Personalization: From story-line to practice. Social Policy & Administration 45(1): 54–68.

11.

Parr

(1999) Delusional geographies: The experiential worlds of people during madness/illness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17: 673–690.

12.

Pink

(2006) The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. Oxford: Routledge.

13.

Reavey

(2012) (ed.) Visual Methods in Psychology: Using and Interpreting Images in Qualitative Research. London: Routledge.

14.

Rose

(2007) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials (2nd edn). London: SAGE.

15.

Ruby

(2005) The last 20 years of visual anthropology – a critical review. Visual Studies 20(2): 159–170.

16.

Thrift

(2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.

17.

Tucker

(2010a) Mental health service user territories: Enacting ‘safe spaces’ in the community. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 14(4): 434–448.

18.

Tucker

(2010b) Everyday spaces of mental distress: The spatial habituation of home. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 28: 526–538.

19.

Williams

(1999) Social inequalities and mental health. In: Newnes

Holmes

Dunn

(eds) This Is Madness. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books, pp. 29–51.

Topology and mental distress: Self-care in the life spaces of home

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References