The present study examined the factor structure of 3 smoking-related items administered as part of the California Health Interview Survey. Factorial invariance was examined across Asian Americans (N = 377), Caucasians (N = 1739), African Americans (N = 115), and Latin Americans (N = 814), and across young men (N = 1612) and women (N = 1767). Factorial invariance analyses revealed all minority ethnic groups to be significantly different (p < .05) from Caucasians, and men to differ significantly from women. These findings suggest that the types of smoking behaviors assessed in the California Health Interview Survey do not predict behaviors uniformly across groups.
Al-DelaimyWKEdlandSPierceJP. (2011) California Tobacco Survey (CTS): 2008. La Jolla, CA: California Department of Health Services.
2.
BabyakMAGreenSB (2010) Confirmatory factor analysis: An introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Journal of Biobehavioral Medicine72(6): 587–597.
3.
BentlerPM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238–246.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Vital signs: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥ 18 years—United States, 2005–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report60: 1207–1212.
5.
ChenXUngerJBCruzTB. (1999) Smoking patterns of Asian-American youth in California and their relationship with acculturation. Journal of Adolescent Health24(5): 321–328.
6.
CHIS 2009 Adolescent Public Use File (2011) California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
7.
DornelasEPattenCFischerE. (2005) Ethnic variation in socioenvironmental factors that influence adolescent smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health36(3): 170–177.
8.
FordKHDiamondPMKelderSH. (2009) Validation of scales measuring attitudes, self efficacy, and intention related to smoking among middle school students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors23(2): 271–278.
9.
HansonMJ (1997) The Theory of Planned Behavior applied to cigarette smoking in African-American, Puerto Rican, and non-Hispanic Caucasian teenage females. Nursing Research46: 155–162.
10.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covaraince structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structrual Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
11.
JohnstonLO’MalleyPBachmanJ (2012) Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
12.
KanazawaSHellbergJE (2010) Intelligence and substance use. Review of General Psychology14(4): 382–396.
13.
MacPhersonLMyersMG (2004) Invariance study of an adolescent survey-based smoking-related cognitions scale: Examination across Hispanic and Caucasian groups. Preventive Medicine39: 1026–1035.
14.
MarinBVMarinGPerez-StableEJ. (1990a) Cultural differences in attitudes toward smoking: Developing messages using the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology20(6): 478–493.
15.
MarinBVPerez-StableEJSabogalF (1990b) Attitudes and behaviors of Hispanic smokers: Implications for cessation interventions. Health Education Quarterly17(3): 287–297.
16.
MarshHW (1994) Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal1: 5–34.
17.
MorissetteSBGulliverSBKamholzBW. (2008) Differences between daily smokers, chippers, and nonsmokers with co-occurring anxiety and alcohol-use disorders. Addictive Behaviors33: 1425–1431.
OsypukTLKawachiISubramanianS. (2006) Are state patterns of smoking different for different racial/ethnic groups? An application of multilevel analysis. Public Health Reports121(5): 563–577.
20.
Perez-StableEJBenowitzNL (2011) Do biological differences help explain tobacco-related disparities?American Journal of Health Promotion25(5): S8–S10.
21.
RamoDEHallSMPochaskaJJ (2011) Reliability and validity of self-reported smoking in an anonymous online survey with young adults. Health Psychology30(6): 693–701.
22.
ShakibSMouttapaMJohnsonC. (2003) Ethnic variation in parenting characteristics and adolescent smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health33(2): 88–97.
23.
ShiffmanS (1989) Tobacco “chippers”—Individual differences in tobacco dependence. Psychopharmocology97(4): 539–547.
24.
ShiffmanSTindleHLiX. (2012) Characteristics and smoking patterns of intermittent smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology20(4): 264–277.
25.
Spruijt-MetzDGallaherPEUngerJB. (2004) Meanings of smoking and adolescent smoking across ethnicities. Journal of Adolescent Health35(3): 197–205.
26.
SteigerJH (1990) Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research25(2): 173–180.
27.
TaylorWCAyarsCLGladneyA. (1999) Beliefs about smoking among adolescents: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse8(3): 37–54.
28.
UngerJBCruzTBRohrbachLA. (2000) English language use as a risk factor for smoking initiation among Hispanic and Asian American adolescents: Evidence for mediation by tobacco-related beliefs and social norms. Health Psychology19(5): 403–410.
29.
ValloneDAllenJAClaytonRR. (2007) How reliable and valid is the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS-4) for youth of various racial/ethnic groups?Addiction102: 71–78.
30.
VandenbergRJLanceCE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods3(1): 4–69.
31.
VidrineJIAndersonCBPollakKI. (2006) Gender differences in adolescent smoking: Mediator and moderator effects of self-generated expected smoking outcomes. American Journal of Health Promotion20(6): 383–387.
