We investigated everyday odor experiences in 55 people (14–75 years old) who rated their sense of smell as far better than average. Compared to 55 gender- and age-matched controls, the self-reported hyperosmics scored higher on the Affective Impact of Odor Scale, rated negative consequences and unpleasant memories due to odors as more likely, rated environmental odors as more annoying, reported increased sensitivity to specific odors more frequently, paid more attention to odors, and agreed more strongly that their sense of smell has caused inconvenience to them. Based on these data, subjective hyperosmia is associated with primarily negative odor-related experiences.
BrämersonAJohanssonLEkL. (2004) Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction: The Skövde population-based study. The Laryngoscope114(4): 733–737.
2.
DaltonPHummelT (2000) Chemosensory function and response in idiopathic environmental intolerance. Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, PA)15(3): 539–556.
3.
Das-MunshiJRubinJGWesselyS (2007) Multiple chemical sensitivities: Review. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery15(4): 274–280.
4.
DotyRLDeemsDAFryeRE. (1988) Olfactory sensitivity, nasal resistance, and autonomic function in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities. Archives of Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery114(12): 1422–1427.
5.
DotyRLSmithRMcKeownDA. (1994) Tests of human olfactory function: Principal component analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Perception & Psychophysics56(6): 701–707.
6.
HummelTSekingerBWolfSR. (1997) ‘Sniffin’ sticks’: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chemical Senses22(1): 39–52.
7.
HummelTNordinS (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Oto-Laryngologica125(2): 116–121.
8.
HummelTKobalGGudziolH. (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: An upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology264(3): 237–243.
9.
KnaapilaATuorilaHKyvikKO. (2008) Self-ratings of olfactory function reflect odor annoyance rather than olfactory acuity. The Laryngoscope118(12): 2212–2217.
10.
KobalGHummelTSekingerB. (1996) “Sniffin’ sticks”: Screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology34(4): 222–226.
11.
KoskinenSVentoSMalmbergH. (2004) Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings. Acta Oto-Laryngologica124(9): 1072–1077.
12.
LandisBNHummelTHugentoblerM. (2003) Ratings of overall olfactory function. Chemical Senses28(8): 691–694.
13.
LandisBNKonnerthCGHummelT (2004) A study on the frequency of olfactory dysfunction. The Laryngoscope114(10): 1764–1769.
14.
LehrnerJPusswaldGGleissA. (2009) Odor identification and self-reported olfactory functioning in patients with subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist23(5): 818–830.
15.
MorganCDMurphyC (2002) Olfactory event-related potentials in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society8(6): 753–763.
16.
MurphyCSchubertCRCruickshanksKJ. (2002) Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA288(18): 2307–2312.
17.
NordinSMonschAUMurphyC (1995) Unawareness of smell loss in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Discrepancy between self-reported and diagnosed smell sensitivity. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences50(4): P187–P192.
18.
NordinSBrämersonALidenE. (1998) The Scandinavian Odor Identification Test: Development, reliability, validity and normative data. Acta Oto-Laryngologica118(2): 226–234.
19.
PhilpottCMWolstenholmeCRGoodenoughPC. (2006) Comparison of subjective perception with objective measurement of olfaction. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery134(3): 488–490.
20.
SchiffmanSSSattely-MillerEASuggsMS. (1995) The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents. Brain Research Bulletin37(4): 369–375.
21.
SchiffmanSSWilliamsCM (2005) Science of odor as a potential health issue. Journal of Environmental Quality34(1): 129–138.
22.
SnowJBJrDotyRLBartoshukLM. (1991) Categorization of chemosensory disorders. In:GetchellTVBartoshukLMDotyRL. (eds) Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. New York: Raven Press, pp. 445–447.
23.
SöderholmASöderbergANordinS (2011) The experience of living with sensory hyperreactivity—Accessibility, financial security, and social relationships. Health Care for Women International32(8): 686–707.
24.
WrzesniewskiAMcCauleyCRozinP (1999) Odor and affect: Individual differences in the impact of odor on liking for places, things and people. Chemical Senses24(6): 713–721.
