Risky business: Risk information and the moderating effect of message frame and past behaviour on women’s perceptions of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2012
Risky business: Risk information and the moderating effect of message frame and past behaviour on women’s perceptions of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine
The effect of response cost information, message framing and past behaviour on women’s coping appraisal and motivation to be vaccinated against the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) were investigated using a 2 Frame × 2 Response Cost × 2 Pap Status design. Women (N = 286) read one of four messages about the vaccine. Women who received high-risk information perceived the vaccine as having higher response cost and were less motivated to be vaccinated compared to women who received low-risk information. The deleterious effects of risk information on specific aspects of women’s coping appraisal may be mitigated by appropriately framed messages.
AbdelmuttiNHoffman-GoetzL (2009) Risk messages about HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine Gardasil: A content analysis of Canadian and U.S. national newspaper articles. Women & Health49(5): 422–440.
2.
AbhyankarPO’ConnorDBLawtonR (2008) The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine13(1): 1–16.
BrewerNTFazekasKI (2007) Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: A theory-informed, systematic review. Preventive Medicine45(2–3): 107–114.
5.
CaskeyRLindauSTAlexanderGC (2009) Knowledge and early adoption of the HPV vaccine among girls and young women: Results of a national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health45(5): 453–462.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases and Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (2010) Reports of health concerns following HPV vaccination. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaccines/hpv/gardasil.html (accessed March 2009).
7.
CherubiniPRumiatiRRossiDNigroFCalabroA (2005) Improving attitudes toward prostate examinations by loss-framed appeals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35(4): 732–744.
8.
CohenJ (1992) Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science1(3): 98–101.
9.
ConsedineNSHortonDMagaiCKukafkaR (2007) Breast screening in response to gain, loss, and empowerment framed messages among diverse, low-income women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved18(3): 550–566.
10.
CourneyaKSHellstenLM (2001) Cancer prevention as a source of exercise motivation: An experimental test using protection motivation theory. Psychology, Health & Medicine6(1): 59–64.
11.
GerendMShepherdJ (2007) Using message framing to promote acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology26(6): 745–752.
12.
GerendMASiasT (2009) Message framing and color priming: How subtle threat cues affect persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(4): 999–1002.
13.
GerendMShepherdJMondayK (2008) Behavioural frequency moderates the effects of message framing on HPV vaccine acceptability. Annals of Behavioural Medicine35: 221–229.
14.
HeveyDPertlMThomasKMaherLCraigAChuinneagainSN (2010) Body consciousness moderates the effect of message framing on intentions to use sunscreen. Journal of Health Psychology15(4): 553–559.
15.
LatimerAESaloveyPRothmanAJ (2007) The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviour: Is all hope lost?Journal of Health Communication12(7): 645–649.
16.
LatimerAERenchTARiversSE. (2008) Promoting participation in physical activity using framed messages: An application of prospect theory. British Journal of Health Psychology13(Pt 4): 659–681.
17.
LeeJParsonsGGentlemanJ (1998) Failing short of Pap test guidelines. Health Reports10(1): 9–19.
18.
McCaulKJohnsonRRothmanA (2002) The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychology21(6): 624–628.
19.
MeyerowitzBChaikenS (1987) The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(3): 500–510.
20.
NeuwirthKDunwoodySGriffinRJ (2000) Protection motivation and risk communication. Risk Analysis20(5): 721–734.
21.
NunnallyJ (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
RhodesRCourneyaK (2003) Self-efficacy, controllability and intention in the theory of planned behaviour: Measurement redundancy or causal independence?Psychology and Health18(1): 79–91.
23.
RogersRW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology91: 93–114.
24.
RothmanASaloveyP (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate health behaviour: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin121(1): 3–19.
25.
TiroJMeissnerHKobrinSCholetteV (2007) What do women in the U.S. know about Human Papillomavirus and cervical cancer?Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention16(2): 288–294.
26.
TollBASaloveyPO’MalleySMazureCLatimerAMcKeeSA (2008) Message framing for smoking cessation: The interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine Tobacco Research10(1): 195–200.
27.
WilliamsTClarkeVBorlandR (2001) Effects of message framing on breast-cancer-related beliefs and behaviours: The role of mediating factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology31(5): 925–950.
