This pilot study investigated the association of self-efficacy with enrollment in and compliance with an 8-week exercise trial. We compared self-efficacy levels of adults who were eligible but did not enroll (N=221) to those who enrolled (N=115) and enrollees who were compliant at the end of the study (N=66). Those in the top three self-efficacy quintiles had higher odds of enrollment (adjusted odds ratios (AOR)=2.61–2.82) and being compliant at the end of the trial (AOR=4.31–4.38) compared to those in the lowest efficacy quintile. These results demonstrated the theoretical association between self-efficacy and one’s choice of behavior.
American Heart Association (2001) Exercise and Your Heart: A Guide to Physical Activity. (No. 50-1436r) Dallas, TX: American Heart Association National Center.
2.
AshfordSEdmundsJFrenchDP (2010) What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology15: 265–288.
3.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5.
CarlsonSAFultonJESchoenbornCALoustalotF (2010) Trend and prevalence estimates based on the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine39(4): 305–313.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2001) Increasing physical activity. A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recommendations and Reports50(RR-18): 1–14.
7.
GarberCEBlissmerBDeschenesMRFranklinBALamonteMJLeeI. (2011) Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, muskuloskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine& Science in Sports & Exercise43: 1334–1359.
8.
GlasgowRENelsonCCKearneyKAReidRRitzwollerDPStrecherVJ. (2007) Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss programme in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research9(2): e11.
9.
GlasgowREStryckerLAKurzDFaberABellHDickmanJM. (2010) Recruitment for an internet-based diabetes self-management programme: scientific and ethical implications. Annals of Behavioral Medicine40(1): 40–48.
10.
JeromeGJMarquezDXMcAuleyECanaklisovaSSnookEVickersM (2002) Self-efficacy effects on feeling states in women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine9(2): 139–154.
11.
McAuleyE (1992) The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine15: 65–88.
12.
McAuleyEBlissmerB (2000) Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Review28(2): 85–88.
13.
McAuleyEBlissmerBKatulaJDuncanTEMihalkoSL (2000a) Physical activity, self-esteem, and self-efficacy relationships in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine22(2): 131–139.
14.
McAuleyEBlissmerBMarquezDXJeromeGJKramerAFKatulaJ (2000b) Social relations, physical activity, and well-being in older adults. Preventive Medicine31: 608–617.
15.
McAuleyEJeromeGJElavskySMarquezDXRamseySN (2003) Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults. Preventive Medicine37: 110–118.
16.
SherwoodNEJefferyRW (2000) The behavioral determinants of exercise: Implications for physical activity interventions. Annual Review of Nutrition20: 21–44.
17.
SpittaelsHDe BourdeaudhuijI (2007) Who participates in a computer-tailored physical activity programme delivered through the Internet? A comparison of participants’ and non-participants’ characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity4: 39.
18.
ThomasSReadingJShepardRJ (1992) Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences17(4): 338–345.
