This study examined how message framing effects can be moderated by two types of risk: (a) perceived effectiveness in preventing a risk and (b) perceived susceptibility to the risk. The results indicate that the perceived effectiveness moderated framing effects on the intention to use sunscreen such that a loss-framed message was more effective when perceived effectiveness was low, whereas a gain-framed message was more effective when perceived effectiveness was high. In addition, perceived susceptibility to skin cancer moderated framing effects on the intention to use sunscreen and the intention to wear long pants such that a loss-framed message was more effective when perceived susceptibility was high.
ApanovitchA MMcCarthyDSaloveyP (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 23, 60–67.
2.
AtkinC KFreimuthV S (2001). Formative evaluation research in campaign design. In RiceR. E.AtkinC. K. (Eds.), Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage:.
3.
BartelsR DKellyK MRothmanA J (2010). Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychology and Health, 25, 821–838.
4.
BlockL GKellerP A (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effect of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192–203.
5.
CarmelSShaniERosenbergL (1994). The role of age and an expanded health belief model in predicting skin cancer protective behavior. Health Education Research, 9, 433–447.
6.
ChoH.BosterF. J. (2008). Effects of gain vs. loss frame anti-drug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58, 428–446.
7.
CokkinidesVEJohnston-DavisKWeinstockMO’ConnellMCKalsbeekWThunMJWingoPA (2001). Sun exposure and sun protection behaviors and attitudes among U.S. youth, 11 to 18 years of age. Preventive Medicine, 33, 141–151.
8.
DetweilerJBBedellBTSaloveyPProninERothmanAJ (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189–196.
9.
ElwoodJMJopsonJ (1997). Melanoma and sun exposure: An overview of published studies. International Journal of Cancer, 73, 198–203.
10.
GallagherKMUpdegraffJ ARothmanA JSimsL (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30, 145–152.
11.
GellerACColditzGOliveriaSEmmonsKJorgensenCAwehGNFrazierAL (2002). Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10,000 U.S. children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 109, 1009–1014.
12.
GerendMAShepherdJ E (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26, 745–752.
13.
GlanzKYarochA LDancelMSaraiyaMCraneL ABullerDB. (2008). Measures of sun exposure and sun safety practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Archives of Dermatololgy, 144, 217–222.
14.
HeveyDPertlMThomasKMaherLCraigAChuinneagainS N (2010). Body consciousness moderates the effect of message framing on intentions to use sunscreen. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 553–559.
15.
HillD.DixonH (1999). Promoting sun protection in children: Rationale and challenges. Health Education and Behavior, 26, 409–417.
16.
HoffnerCYeJ (2009). Young adults’ responses to news about sunscreen and skin cancer: The role of framing and social comparison. Health Communication, 24, 189–198.
17.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
18.
LeeC KBrownR.BloodD (2000). The effects of efficacy, cognitive processing and message framing on persuasion. Australasian Marketing Journal, 8, 5–17.
19.
MichielutteRDignanM BSharpP CBoxleyJWellsH B (1996). Skin cancer prevention and early detection practices in a sample of rural women. Preventive Medicine, 25, 673–683.
20.
O’KeefeD JJensenJ D (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644.
21.
RiversS ESaloveyPPizarroD APizarroJSchneiderT R (2005). Message framing and pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 65–77.
22.
RothmanASaloveyP (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19.
23.
RothmanAJSaloveyPAntoneCKeoughKMartinCD (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408–433.
24.
SaraiyaMGlanzKBrissPANicholsPWhiteCDasD. (2004). Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 422–466.
25.
VainioHBianchiniF (2001) (Eds). Handbooks of cancer prevention. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization.
26.
WeinstockMARossiJSReddingCAMaddockJECottrillSD (2000). Sun safety behaviors and stages of change for the primary prevention of skin cancers among beachgoers in Southeastern New England. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 286–293.
27.
WerrijM QRuiterR A Cvan ‘T RietJDe VriesH (2010). Self-efficacy as a potential moderator of the effects of framed health messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 199–207.
28.
WitteKCameronK AMcKeonJ KBerkowitzJ M (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 317–341.
