Connectedness with nature (CN) is seen as a personal disposition relevant for environmental as well as human health. In five questionnaire studies (N = 547) we systematically investigated the relationship between various operationalizations of well-being and CN. CN was assessed with two different tools in parallel. All significant correlations were controlled for the effects of age and gender. Psychological well-being, meaningfulness and vitality were found to be robustly correlated with CN. We highlight the relevance of CN with respect to human health and further discuss conceptual differences unraveled by the concurrent application of two CN-tools.
AbrahamASommerhalderKBolliger-SalzmannHAbelT (2007) Landschaft und Gesundheit. Das Potential einer Verbindung zweier Konzepte [Landscape and Health. The potential of a combination of two concepts]. Bern: Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.
2.
AngermayerMCKilianRMatschingerH (2000) WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
3.
BeckerP (1989) Der Trierer Persönlichkeitsfragebogen [Trier Personality Questionnaire]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
BognerFXRoczenNKaiserFG (2008) Competence formation in environmental education: Advancing ecology-specific rather than general abilities. Umweltpsychologie12(2): 56–70.
6.
BüssingAOstermannTMatthiessenPF (2005) Role of religion and spirituality in medical patients: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(10). doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-1010.1186/1477-7525-3-10.
7.
BullingerM (1998). Zum Einfluss wahrgenommener Umweltbedingungen auf die subjektive Gesundheit. [On the impact of perceived environmental conditions on subjective health]. In: KalsE (ed) Umwelt und Gesundheit [Environment and health]. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
8.
BullingerMKirchbergerI (1989) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand [SF-36 Health-Survey]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
9.
CamfieldLSkevingtonSM (2008) On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology13(6): 764–775.
10.
De VriesSVerhejiRAGroenewegenPPSpreeuwenbergP (2003) Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A35(10): 1717–1731.
DienerE (2000) Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist55(1): 34–43.
13.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsenRJGriffinS (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49(1): 71–75.
14.
DienerELucasREOishiS (2002) Subjective well-being:The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: SnyderCRLopezSJ (eds) The Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 213–229.
FrumkinH (2001) Beyong toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine20(3): 234–240.
17.
GroenewegenPPVan den BergAEDe VriesSVerheijRA (2006) Vitamin G: Effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health 6. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-14910.1186/1471-2458-6-149.
18.
HartigTCooper MarcusC (2006) Healing gardens – places for nature in health care. The Lancet368(9529): 36–37.
19.
HartigTEvansGWJamnerLDDavisDSGärlingT (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology23(2): 109–123.
20.
Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment (2004) Nature and health. The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being.The Hague: Publication no. 2004/09E; RMNO publication nr A02ae. http://www.gr.nl/pdf.php?ID=1019&p=1
21.
HindsJSparksP (2008) Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology28(2): 109–120.
22.
KalsESchumacherDMontadaL (1999) Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior31(2): 178–202.
23.
KaplanS (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology15(3): 169–182.
24.
KaplanSKaplanR (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KarleggerA (2010) Naturverbundenheit und Umweltidentität im Jugendalter: Der Einfluss von Naturkontakt und sozialem Kontext [Connectedness with nature and environmental identity: The influence of contact with nature and social context]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.
26.
LafortezzaRCarrusGSanesiGDaviesC (2009) Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening8(2): 97–108.
27.
LeopoldA (1949) A Sand County Almanac. And Sketches Here and There.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
MayerFSFrantzC (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology24(4): 503–515.
29.
MayerFSFrantzCBruehlman-SenecalEDolliverK (2009) Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior41(5): 607–642.
30.
MitchellRPophamF (2007) Greenspace, urbanity and health: Relationships in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health61(8): 681–683.
31.
NisbetEKLZelenskiJMMurphySA (2009) The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior41(5): 715–740.
32.
PriestP (2007) The healing balm effect: Using a walking group to feel better. Journal of Health Psychology12(1): 36–52.
33.
RapleyM (2003) Quality of Life Research – A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
34.
SchultzPWTabanicoJJ (2007) Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37(6): 1219–1247.
StaatsHKievietAHartigT (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology23(2): 147–157.
UlrichRS (1981) Natural versus urban scenes. Environment and Behavior13(5): 523–556.
42.
UlrichRS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science224(4647): 420–421.
43.
UlrichRSSimonsRFLositoBDFioritoEMilesMAZelsonM (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology11(3): 201–230.
