As predictive genetic testing availability increases so does our need to understand factors associated with test uptake. This study tests whether the order positive and negative information about genetic testing for breast cancer is presented in affects intention to take a genetic test. Eighty-four women were randomly allocated into three groups: (1) positive then negative information; (2) negative then positive information; and (3) a control group. A significant effect was found in relation to perceived risk, attitudes towards genetic testing, perceived disadvantages of testing and intention. Our findings point to a primacy effect, whereby information presented first has the greatest effect.
Adelman, L., Bresnick, T., Black, P.K., Marvin, F.F., & Sak, S.G. ( 1996). Research with patriot air defense officers: Examining information order effects. Human Factors, 38, 250-261.
2.
Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing. (1998 ). Report on genetic testing for late onset disorders. London: Health Departments of the United Kingdom.
3.
Ajzen, I. ( 1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
5.
Bergus, G.R., Levin, I.P., & Elstein, A.S. ( 2002). Presenting risks and benefits to patients: The effect of information order on decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 612-617.
6.
Bosompra, K., Flynn, B.S., Shikaga, T., Rairikar, C.J., Worden, J.K., & Soloman, L.J. ( 2000). Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: A population based study. Preventive Medicine, 19, 823-839.
7.
Braithwaite, D., Sutton, S., & Steggles, N. ( 2002). Intention to participate in predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer: The role of attitude toward uncertainty. Psychology & Health, 17, 761-772.
8.
Cameron, L.D., & Diefenbach, M.A. (2001). Responses to information about psychosocial consequences of genetic testing for breast cancer: Influences of cancer worry and risk perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology , 6, 47-59.
9.
Codori, A.M., Petersen, G.M., Miglioretti D.L., Larkin, E.K., Bushey, M.T., Young, C. ... Booker, S.V. ( 1999). Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting uptake. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention , 8, 345-351.
10.
Cooke, R., & French, D.P. ( 2008). How well do the Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 23, 745-765.
11.
Donovan, K.A., & Tucker, D.C. ( 2000). Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample . Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 23, 15-36.
12.
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. ( 2001). Presenting risk information: A review of the effects of framing and other manipulations of patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 61-82.
13.
Etchegary, H. ( 2004). Psychological aspects of genetic-test decisions: What do we know so far? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy , 4, 13-31.
14.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. ( 1995). Human genetics: The science and its consequences . London: HMSO.
15.
Hughes, C., Gomez-Caminero, A., Benkendorf, J., Kerner, J., Isaacs, C., Barter, J., & Lerman, C. ( 1997). Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. Patient Education & Counseling, 32, 51-62.
16.
Kessler, S. ( 1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited. American Journal of Medical Genetics , 72, 164-171.
17.
Lerman, C., Croyle, R.T., Tercyak, K.P., & Hamann, H. ( 2002). Genetic testing: Psychological aspects and implications . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 784-797.
18.
Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J.S. ( 2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer , & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619-642). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Meiser, B. ( 2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology , 14, 1060-1074.
20.
Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. ( 1985). Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
21.
Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. ( 1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201-228.
22.
Shiloh, S. ( 1996). Decision-making in the context of genetic risk . In T. Marteau & M. P. M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix (pp. 82-103). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
23.
Tubbs, R.M., Gaeth, G.J., Levin, I.P., & van Osdol, L.A. (1993). Order effects in belief updating with consistent and inconsistent evidence. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 6, 257-269.
24.
Wroe, A.L., & Salkovskis, P.M. (1999). Factors influencing anticipated decisions about genetic testing: Experimental studies. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 19-40.
25.
Wroe, A.L., Salkovskis, P.M., & Rimes, K.A. ( 1998). The prospect of predictive testing for personal risk: Attitudes and decision making. Behaviour Research and Therapy , 36, 599-620.
26.
Zigmond, A.S., & Snaith, R.P. ( 1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatria Scandinavia, 67, 361-370.
