This large-scale Internet-experiment tests whether vaccine-critical pages raise perceptions of the riskiness of vaccinations and alter vaccination intentions. We manipulated the information environment (vaccine-critical website, control, both) and the focus of search (on vaccination risks, omission risks, no focus). Our analyses reveal that accessing vaccine-critical websites for five to 10 minutes increases the perception of risk of vaccinating and decreases the perception of risk of omitting vaccinations as well as the intentions to vaccinate. In line with the ‘risk-as-feelings’ approach, the affect elicited by the vaccine-critical websites was positively related to changes in risk perception.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
2.
Benin, A.L., Wisler-Scher, D.J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E.D., & Holmboe, E.S. ( 2006). Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust. Pediatrics , 117, 1532-1541.
3.
Betsch, C. ( 2008). Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making: Lessons learned about intuition from an individual differences approach. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 231-248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Betsch, C. ( 2009). Online-supplement complementing ‘The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks’. Available at www.cornelia-betsch.de
5.
Betsch, C., & Iannello, P. (in press). Measuring individual differences in intuitive and deliberate decision making styles: A comparison of different measures. In A. Glöckner & C. Witteman (Eds.), Tracing intuition: Recent methods in measuring intuitive and deliberate processes in decision making. London: Psychology Press & Routledge.
6.
Betsch, C., & Renkewitz, F. (in press). Langfristige Auswirkungen einer Informationssuche auf impfkritischen Internetseiten [Long-term consequences of an information-search on vaccine-critical web-sites]. Prävention.
7.
Brewer, N.T., Chapman, G.B., Gibbons, F.X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K.D., & Weinstein, N.D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136-145.
Davies, P., Chapman, S., & Leask, J. ( 2002). Anti-vaccination activists on the world wide web. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 87, 22-25.
10.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Freed, G.L., Clark, S.J., Hibbs, B.F., & Santoli, J.M. ( 2004). Parental vaccine safety concerns: The experiences of pediatricians and family physicians. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 11-14.
12.
Fu, W.-T., & Pirolli, P. ( 2007). SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 355-412. Globalpark. (2008). http://www.globalpark.com (last accessed 2 December 2009).
13.
Hardy, M.A. ( 1993). Regression with dummy variables. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
14.
Hendrickx, L., Vlek, C., & Oppewal, H. ( 1989). Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgement of risk. Acta Psychologica, 72, 41-63. Hovland, C., Lumsdaine, A., & Sheffield , F. (1949). Experiments on mass communication: Studies in social psychology in World War II, vol. 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Klayman, J., & Ha, W. ( 1987). Confirmation, discontinuation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
16.
Kumkale, G., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin , 130, 143-172.
17.
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C., & Welch, N. ( 2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin , 127, 267-286. Muscat, M., Bang, H., Wohlfahrt, J., Glismann, S., & Molbak, K. (2009). Measles in Europe: An epidemiological assessment. The Lancet , 373, 383-389.
18.
Nickerson, R.S. ( 1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises . Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
19.
Peters, E., Lipkus, I.M., & Diefenbach, M.A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, 140-162.
20.
Pirolli, P. ( 2005). Rational analyses of information foraging on the Web . Cognitive Science, 29, 343-373.
21.
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. ( 2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322-325.
Ubel, P., Jepson, C., & Baron, J. ( 2001). The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: Effect on treatment choices. Medical Decision Making, 21, 60-68.
24.
Van der Pligt, J. ( 1996). Risk perception and self-protective behavior. European Psychologist, 1, 34-43.
25.
Van der Pligt, J. ( 2002). Cognition and affect in risk perception and risky decision-making . In C. von Hofsten & L. Backman (Eds.), Psychology at the turn of the millennium: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives (vol. 2, pp. 247-270). Hove: Psychology Press. Weinstein, N.D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology , 12, 324-333.
26.
Weinstein, N.D., & Nicolich, M.M. (1993). Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Health Psychology, 12, 235-245.
27.
Wolfe, R., Sharp, L., & Lipsky, M. ( 2002). Content and design attributes of antivaccination web sites. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 3245-3248. Zimmerman, R., Wolfe, R., Fox, D., Fox, J., Nowalk, M., Troy, J., & Sharp, L. (2005). Vaccine criticism on the world wide web. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7.
