This study explored whether breast scarring following a lumpectomy generated negative judgements using an experimental between subjects factorial design. Eight images of women varying in terms of breast scarring (present vs. absent), beauty (average vs. high) and celebrity (as a proxy for familiarity; present vs. absent) were rated by 232 participants. The results showed that scarring resulted in lower ratings of attractiveness and self esteem and higher ratings of femininity. Scarred celebrities were judged as particularly unattractive. Women's assumption that they will be judged more harshly following breast cancer surgery maybe reflected in the actual ratings of others.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H.T. (1998). Determinants of physical attractiveness [online] . Available at http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractiveness (accessed 11 October 2005).
2.
Bradbury, E. (1997). Understanding the problems. In R. Landsdown, N. Rumsey, E. Bradbury, T. Carr , & J. Partridge (Eds.), Visibly different: Coping with disfigurement, 180-193. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann.
3.
Bull, R., & Brooking, J. (1985). Does marriage influence whether a facially disfigured person is judged to be physically attractive? Journal of Psychology , 119, 163-167.
4.
Carver, C.S., Pozo-Kaderman, C., Price, A.A., Noriega, V., Harris, S.D., Derhagopian, R.P. et al. (1998). Concern about aspects of body image and adjustment to early breast stage cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine , 60, 168-174.
5.
Cohen, J., Cullen, J.W., & Martin, L.R. (1982). Psychosocial aspects of cancer. New York: Raven Press.
6.
Cook, M. (1981). The bases of human sexual attraction. London & New York: Academic Press.
7.
Corneille, O., Monin, B., & Pleyers, G. (2005). Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 431-437.
8.
Coughlan, G., & Clarke, A. (2002). Shame and burns. In P. Gilbert & J. Miles (Eds.), Body shame, 155-170. Hove: Brunner Routledge.
9.
Deaux, K., Winston, W., Crowley, M. & Lewis, L.L. (1985). Level of categorisation and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145-167.
10.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
11.
Eagley, A.H., Ashmoore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., & Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
12.
Gillen, B. (1981). Physical attractiveness: A determinant of the two types of goodness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 7, 277-281.
13.
Goldberg, J.G. (1990). Psychotherapeutic treatment of cancer patients . New Jersey: Transaction Publishers .
14.
Grandfield, T.A., Thompson, A.R., & Turpin, G. (2005). An attitudinal study of responses to a range of dermatological conditions using the implicit association task. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 821-829.
15.
Hartl, K., Janni, W., Kastner, R., Sommer, H., Strobl, B., Rack, B., & Stauber, M. (2003). Impact of medical and demographic factors on long terms quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 14, 1064-1071.
16.
Hobler-Kahane, D. (2005). Beauty and the breasts: Learning to love your body again [online]. Available at http://www.thebreastcaresite.com (accessed 24 November 2005).
17.
Houston, V., & Bull, R. (1994). Do people avoid sitting next to someone who is facially disfigured? European Journal of Social Psychology , 24, 279-284.
18.
Kraus, P.L. (1999). Body image, decision making and breast cancer treatment. Cancer Nursing, 22, 421-427.
19.
Lansdown, R., Rumsey, N., Bradbury, E., Carr, T., & Partridge, J. (1997). Visibly different: Coping with disfigurement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
20.
Macgregor, F.C. (1989). Social psychological and cultural dimensions of cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 13, 1-8.
21.
Monson, T.C., & Snyder, M. (1997). Actors, observers and the attribution process: Toward a re-conceptualisation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 89-111.
22.
Moyer, A. (1997). Psychosocial outcomes of breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: A meta analytic review. Health Psychology , 16, 284-298.
23.
Newell, R. (2000). Body image and disfigurement care. London & New York: Routledge .
24.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35, 250-256.
25.
Ogden, J., & Mundray, K. (1996). The effect of the media on body satisfaction: The role of gender and size. European Eating Disorders Review , 4, 171-182.
26.
Petronis, V.M., Carver, C.S., Antoni, M.H., & Weiss, S. (2003). Investment in body image and psychosocial well being among women treated for early stage breast cancer: Partial replication and extension. Psychology and Health, 18, 1-13.
27.
Pinder, K.L., Ramierz, A.J., Black, M.E., Richards, M.A., Gregory, W.M., Rubens, R.D. (1993). Psychiatric disorder in patients with advanced breast cancer: Prevalence and associated factors. European Journal of Cancer, 29A, 524-527.
28.
Reinisch, J.M., Rosenblum, L.A., & Sanders, S.A. (1987). Masculinity/femininity: Basic perspectives. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Rumsey, N., Bull, R., & Gahagan, D. (1986). The effect of facial disfigurement on the proxemic behaviour of the general public. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 137-150.
30.
Rumsey, N., & Harcourt, D. (2004). Body image and disfigurement: Issues and interventions . Body Image, 1, 83-97.
31.
Rumsey, N., & Harcourt, D. (2005). The psychology of appearance. Buckingham: Open University Press.
32.
Steginga, S., Occhipinti, S., Wilson, K., & Dunn, J. (1998). Domains of distress: The experience of breast cancer in Australia. Oncology Nurse Forum, 25, 1063-1070.
33.
Turner, S., Thomas, P., Dowell, T., Rumsey, N. & Sandy, J. (1997). Psychological outcomes amongst cleft patients and their families. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 50, 1-10.
34.
Wetzel, C.G., Wilson, T.D., & Kort, J. (1981). The halo effect revisited: Forewarned is not forearmed . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 427-439.
35.
Yurek, D., Farrar, W., & Andersen, B.L. (2000). Breast cancer surgery: Comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in post operative sexuality and body change stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 679-709.
36.
Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monograph Supplement No. 2, Pt 2.
