This literature review of research on health-related computer-mediated support groups links features of these groups to existing theory from the areas of social support and computer-mediated communication research. The article exams computer-mediated support groups as weak tie networks, focuses on how these support groups facilitate participant similarity and empathic support and identifies changes in supportive communication due to characteristics of the medium.
Adelman, M.B., & Frey, L.R. (1997). The fragile community: Living together with AIDS . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
2.
Adelman, M.B., Parks, M.R., & Albrecht, T.L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In T. L. Albrecht & M. B. Adelman (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 126-147). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Albrecht, T.L., & Adelman, M.B. (1987). Communicating social support: A theoretical perspective . In T. L. Albrecht & M. B. Adelman (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 18-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Albrecht, T.L., Burleson, B.R., & Goldsmith, D. (1994). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd edn, pp. 419-449). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Aneshensel, C.S., & Stone, J.D. (1982). Stress and depression: A test of the buffering model of social support. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 1392-1396.
6.
Ballieux, R.E., & Heijen, C.J. (1989). Stress and the immune response. In H. Weiner, I. Floring, R. Murison, & D. Hellhammer (Eds.), Frontiers of stress research (pp. 51-55). Toronto , Canada: Huber.
7.
Barbee, A.P. (1990). Interactive coping: The cheering-up process in close relationships. In S. Duck & R. Silver (Eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 46-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Barnes, M.K., & Duck, S. (1994). Everyday communicative contexts for social support . In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 175-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Berkman, L.F., & Syme, L.S. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186-204.
10.
Billings, A.G., & Moos, R.H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the impact of stressful life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139-157.
11.
Binik, Y.M., Cantor, J., Ochs, E., & Meana, M. (1997). From the couch to the keyboard: Psychotherapy in cyberspace. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 71-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Blazer, D. (1982). Social support and mortality in an elderly community population. American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 684-694.
13.
Braithwaite, D.O., Waldron, V.R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication , 11, 123-151.
14.
Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.W., & Woodall, W.G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Burgoon, J.K., & Hale, J.L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs , 54, 19-41.
16.
Campbell, K., & Wright, K.B. (in press). On-line support groups: An investigation of relationships among source credibility, dimensions of relational communication, and perceptions of emotional support . Communication Research Reports.
17.
Choi, N.G. (1996). The never-married and divorced elderly: Comparison of economic and health status, social support, and living arrangement. Journal of Gerentological Social Work, 26, 3-25.
18.
Cline, R.J. (1999). Communication within social support groups. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 516-538). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Cline, R.J., & Boyd, M.F. (1993). Communication as threat and therapy: Stigma, social support, and coping with HIV infection. In E. B. Ray (Ed.), Case studies in health communication (pp. 131-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Cluck, G.G., & Cline, R.J. (1986). The circle of others: Self-help groups for the bereaved. Communication Quarterly, 34, 306-325.
21.
Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269-297.
22.
Dean, A., & Lin, N. (1977). The stress buffering role of social support: Problems and prospects for systematic investigation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 321-341.
23.
Diamond, J. (2000). Narrative means to sober ends: Treating addiction and its aftermath. New York: The Guilford Press.
24.
Dublin, J., Simon, V., & Orem, J. (1997). Analysis of survey results. Paper presented to New York UniversitySchool of Social Work, New York.
25.
Edwards, H., & Noller, P. (1998). Factors influencing caregiver-care receiver communication and the impact on the well-being of older care receivers. Health Communication, 10, 317-342.
26.
Finn, J., & Lavitt, M. (1994). Computer-based self-help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Social Work with Groups, 17, 21-47.
27.
Fisher, W.R. (1987). Human communication as narrative: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
28.
Freund, P.E.S., & McGuire, M.B. (1995). Health, illness and the social body: A critical sociology (pp. 120-142). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Galagher, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1998). Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530.
29.
Goldberg, R., & Cullen, L.O. (1985). Factors important to psychosocial adjustment to cancer: A review of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine , 20, 803-807.
30.
Goldsmith, D.J. (1994). The role of facework in supportive communication . In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 29-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
32.
Granovetter, M.S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
House, J., Landis, K.R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540-545.
34.
Jersild, D. (2001). Happy hours: Alcohol in a woman's life. New York: Harper Collins Books.
35.
Kessler, R.C., Mickelson, K.D., & Zhao, S. (1997). Patterns and correlates of self-help group membership in the United States. Social Policy, 27, 27-47.
36.
King, S.A., & Moreggi, D. (1998). Internet therapy and self-help groups-the pros and cons. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 77-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
Kohn, P.M. (1996). On coping adaptively with daily hassles. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping (pp. 181-201). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38.
Krause, N. (1990). Stress, support, and well-being in later life: Focusing on salient social roles. In M. A. Stephens, J. H. Crowther, S. E. Hobfoll, & D. L. Tennenbaum (Eds.), Stress and coping in later-life families (pp. 71-97). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Company .
39.
LaRocca, J., House, J., & French, J.R. (1980). Social support, occupational health, and stress . Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 201-218.
40.
Levenson, R.W., & Ruef, A.M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234-246.
41.
Lin, N., & Peek, M.K. (1999). Social networks and mental health. In A. V. Horwitz & T. L. Scheid (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. New York: Cambridge.
42.
Matheson, K., & Zanna, M.P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233.
43.
Mickelson, K.D. (1997). Seeking social support: Parents in electronic support groups. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 157-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Miller, J.K., & Gergen, K.J. (1998). Life on the line: The therapeutic potentials of computer-mediated conversation. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 24, 189-202.
45.
Murphy, R.F. (1999). The damaged self. In K. Charmaz & D. A. Paterniti (Eds.), Health, illness, and healing: Society, social context, and self (pp. 62-71). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
46.
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, I.G., & Sarason, B.R. (1996). Coping and social support . In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping (pp. 434-451). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
47.
Preece, J. (1998). Empathetic communities: Reaching out across the Web. Interactions, 2, 32-43.
48.
Preece, J. (1999). Empathetic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 63-77.
49.
Preece, J., & Ghozati, K. (1998). Empathic communities: Offering support and sharing information in a bulletin board community. Paper presented at the UK CVE Conference, 17-19 June. Available online: http://www.ifsm.umbc.edu/communities/UKFinal.html
50.
Preece, J.J., & Ghozati, K. (2001). Experiencing empathy on-line. In R. E. Rice & J. E. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 237-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Rapaport, M. (1991). Computer mediated communications: Bulletin boards, computer conferencing, electronic mail, information retrieval. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
52.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (Eds.) (2001). The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Rice, R.E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research , 14(1), 85-108.
55.
Rook, K.S. (1995). Support, companionship, and control in older adults' social networks: Implications for well-being. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 437-463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
Shinn, M., Lehmann, S., & Wong, N.W. (1984). Social interaction and social support. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 55-76.
57.
Sontag, S. (1990). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors . New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.
58.
Spiegel, D., Bloom, J.R., Kraemer, H.C., & Gottheil, E. (1989). Psychological support for cancer patients. Lancet, 2, 1447.
59.
Sharf, B.F. (1997). Communication of breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women & Health, 26, 65-84.
60.
Sullivan, C.F. (1997). Cancer support groups in cyberspace: Are there gender differences in message functions? Paper presented at the annual Central States Communication Association Convention , St Louis, MO, April.
61.
Thoits, P. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145-159.
62.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York : Simon & Schuster.
63.
UPI. (1999). Harris poll: Most net users want health information. New York: Louis Harris & Associates. Press Release, 11 February 1999, pp. 1-6.
64.
Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
65.
Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
66.
Walsh-Burke, K. (1992). Family communication and coping with cancer: Impact of the We Can Weekend. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 10, 63-81.
67.
Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
68.
Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
69.
Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F., & Park, D.W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction . Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
70.
Walther, J.B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support . In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
71.
Walther, J.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
72.
Weinberg, N., Schmale, J.D., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1995). Computer-mediated support groups. Social Work with Groups, 17, 43-55.
73.
Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network . In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
Wills, T.A. (1985). Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships . In S. Cohen & S. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 61-82). New York: Academic.
75.
Wolcott, D.L., Namir, S., Fawzy, F.I., Gottlieb, M.S., & Mitsuyasu, R.T. (1986). Illness concerns, attitudes toward homosexuality, and social support in gay men with AIDS. General Hospital Psychiatry, 8, 395-403.
76.
Wood, A.F., & Smith, M.J. (2001). Online communication: Linking technology, identity, and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77.
Wright, K.B. (1999). Computer-mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies . Communication Quarterly, 47, 402-414.
78.
Wright, K.B. (2000a). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 44-59.
79.
Wright, K.B. (2000b). The communication of social support within an on-line community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1, 33-43.
80.
Wright, K.B. (in press). Social support within an online cancer community: An assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community. Journal of Applied Communication Research.
