This article presents a tentative grounded theory, which can provide some explanation of variation in behaviour around predictive genetic testing (PGT) for Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), based on interviews with individuals (n = 55) from families with a clinical diagnosis of HNPCC, 12 of whom were followed through the PGT protocol. The theory is built around a core category of engagement, a newly constructed concept reflecting the degree of cognitive and emotional involvement with cancer risk in individuals from these families, and models the psychosocial process of engaging with cancer risk. The degree of engagement at the time of testing can explain variations in approaches and reactions to PGT. A series of social factors, many related to the experiences of family life, emerged as either facilitating or blocking the process of engaging with cancer risk; a series of psychological factors emerged as interacting in a recursive, dynamic manner with each other and with engagement status. The degree of engagement can change with the unfolding of time and events in family life. The theory of engagement (TE) provides an explanatory framework for understanding behaviour related to PGT for HNPCC, and can potentially be applied to research on risk perception in the social sciences more generally. In addition, the theory may have potential uses in the genetics clinic, in identifying individuals at risk of adverse reactions to PGT for cancer, thus enabling better targeting of genetic counselling resources.
Aktan-Collan, K. , Mecklin, J.-P., de la Chapelle, A., Peltomaki, P., Uutela, A., & Kaariainen, H. (2000). Evaluation of a counselling protocol for predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37, 108-113.
2.
Becker, M. H. (1974). The Health Belief Model and sick role behaviour. Health Education Monographs, 2, 409-419.
3.
Biesecker, B. B. , Boenke, M., Calzone, K., Markel, D. S., Garber, J. E., Collins, F. S., & Weber, B. L. (1993). Genetic counseling in families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 1970-1974.
4.
Binedell, J. , Soldan, J. R., & Harper, P. S. (1998a). Predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease: I. Predictors of uptake in South Wales. Clinical Genetics, 54, 477-488.
5.
Binedell, J. , Soldan, J. R., & Harper, P. S. (1998b). Predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease: II. Qualitative findings from a study of uptake in South Wales. Clinical Genetics, 54, 489-496.
6.
Bloch, M. , Fahy, S., & Hayden, M. R. (1989). Predictive testing for Huntington Disease: II Demographic characteristics, lifestyle patterns, attitudes, and psychological assessments of the first 51 test candidates. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 32, 217-224.
7.
Broadstock, M. , Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 8, 731-738
8.
Conner, M. , & Norman, P. (1996). Predicting health behaviour. London: Open University Press.
9.
Cull, A. , Anderson, E. D., Campbell, S., Mackay, J., Smyth, E., & Steel, M. (1999). The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. British Journal of Cancer, 79, 501-508.
10.
Decruyenaere, M. , Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Cassiman, J. J., Cloostermans, T., Demyttenaere, K., Dom, R., & Fryns, J. P. (1999). Psychological functioning before predictive testing for Huntington’s disease: The role of the parental disease, risk perception, and subjective proximity of the disease. Journal of Medical Genetics, 36, 897-905.
11.
Downing, C. (2001). Reproductive decision-making in families at risk for Huntington’s disease: Perceptions of responsibility. PhD Thesis: University of Cambridge.
12.
Dudok de Wit, A. C. (1997). To know or not to know: The psychological implications of presymptomatic DNA testing for autosomal dominant inheritable late onet disorders. PhD Thesis: Erasmus University of Rotterdam.
13.
Evans, D. G. R. , Maher, E. R., Macleod, R., Davies, D. R, & Craufurd, D. (1997). Uptake of genetic testing for cancer predisposition. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34, 746-748.
14.
Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Geller, G. , Doksum, T., Bernhardt, B. A., & Metz, S. A. (1999). Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: Influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women’s decisions. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 8, 377-383.
16.
Glanz, K. , Grove, J., Lerman, C., Gotay, C., & LeMarchand, L. (1999). Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counselling and colorectal cancer genetic testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 8, 329-336.
17.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
18.
Gray, J. , Brain, K., Norman, P., Anglim, C., France, L., Barton, G., Branston, L., Parsons, E., Clarke, A., Sampson, J., Roberts, E., Newcombe, R., Cohen, D., Rogers, C., Mansel, R., & Harper, P. (2000). A model protocol evaluating the introduction of genetic assessment for women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37, 192-196.
19.
Harré, R. , & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Huggins, M. , Bloch, M., Wiggins, S., Adam, S., Suchowersky, O., Trew, M., Klimek, M., Greenberg, C. R., Eleff, M., & Thompson, L. P. (1992). Predictive testing for Huntington’s disease in Canada: Adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 42, 508-515.
21.
Janis, I. L. (1958). Psychological stress. 2nd edn.NY: Wiley.
22.
Johnson, B. B. , & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalisation and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 21-31.
23.
Kessler, S. (1988). Invited essay on the psychological aspects of genetic counseling. V: Preselection: A family coping strategy in Huntington Disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 31, 617-621.
24.
Kessler, S. (1994). Predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease: A psychologist’s view. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 54, 161-166.
25.
Kessler, S. , & Bloch, M. (1989). Social system response to Huntington Disease. Family Process, 28, 59-68.
26.
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019-1024.
27.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
Lerman, C. , Marshall, J., Audrain, J., & Gomez-Caminero, A. (1996). Genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: Anticipated reactions of patients and challenges to providers. International Journal of Cancer (Predictive Oncology), 69, 58-61.
29.
Lerman, C. , Narod, S., Schulman, K., Hughes, C., Gomez-Caminero, A., Bonney, G., Gold, K., Trock, B., Main, D., Lynch, J., Fulmore, C., Snyder, C., Lemon, S. J., Conway, T., Tonin, P., Lenoir, G., & Lynch, H. (1996). BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 1885-1892.
30.
Lerman, C. , Schwarz, M. D., Lin, T. H., Hughes, C., Narod, S., & Lynch, H. T. (1997). The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 414-420.
31.
Leventhal, H. , Benyamini. Y., & Brownlee, S. (1997). Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In K. J. Petrie & J. A. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness (pp. 19-45). London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
32.
Leventhal, H. , Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common-sense representation of illness danger. Medical Psychology, 2, 7-30.
33.
Lynch, H. T. , Lemon, S. J., Durham, C., Tinley, S. T., Connolly, C., Lynch, J. F., Surdam, J., Orinion, E., Slominski-Caster, S., Watson, P., Lerman, C., Tonin, P., Lenoir, G., Serova, O., & Narod, S. (1997). A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer, 79, 2219-2228.
34.
Lynch, H. T. , Lemon, S. J., Karr, B., Franklin, B., Lynch, J. F., Watson, P., Tinley, S., Lerman, C., & Carter, C. (1997). Etiology, natural history, management, and molecular genetics of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome): Genetic counselling implications. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 6, 987-991.
35.
MacLeod, C. , Williams, J. M. G., & Bekerian, D. A. (1991). Worry is reasonable: The role of explanations in pessimism about future personal events. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 478-486.
36.
Maguire, P. , & Faulkner, A. (1988). How to do it: Communicate with cancer patients: Handling uncertainty, collusion and denial. British Medical Journal, 297, 972-974.
37.
McAllister, M. , Evans, D. G. R., Ormiston, W., & Daly, P. (1998). Men in breast cancer families: A preliminary qualitative study on awareness and experience. Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 739-744.
38.
McAllister, M. (1999). Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): A theory of engagement. PhD Thesis: University of Cambridge.
39.
McAllister, M. (2001). Grounded theory in genetic counseling research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 233-251.
40.
Michie, S. , & Marteau, T. (1996). Genetic counselling: Some issues of theory and practice. In T. Marteau, & M. Richards (Eds.), The Troubled Helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Michie, S. , McDonald, V., & Marteau, T. (1996). Understanding responses to predictive genetic testing: A grounded theory approach, Psychology and Health, 11, 455-470.
42.
Mogg, K. , Mathews, A., Eysenck, M. W., & May, J. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Artefacts, processing priorities, or attentional search?Behavioral Research and Therapy, 29, 459-467.
43.
Mogg, K. , Mathews, A., & Weinman, J. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: A replication. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 27, 317-323.
44.
Power, M. , & Dalgliesh, T. (1997). Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder. UK: Psychology Press.
45.
Rees, G. , Fry, A., & Cull, A. (2001). A family history of breast cancer: Women’s experiences from a theoretical prespective. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1433-1440.
46.
Reeve, J. , Owens, G., & Winship, I. (2000). Psychological impact of predictive testing for colonic cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 99-108.
47.
Richards, M. P. R. (1996). Families, kinship and genetics. In T. Marteau, & M. Richards (Eds.), The Troubled Helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics, pp. 249-273. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Rolland, J. S. (1994). Families, illness & disability. NY: BasicBooks.
49.
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 409-419.
Strauss, A. (1989). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Tibben, A. , Duivenvoorden, H. J., Vegter-van der Vlis, M., Niermeijer, M. F., Frets, P. G., van de Kamp, J. J., Roos, R. A., Rooijmans, H. G., & Verhage, F. (1993a). Presymptomatic DNA testing for Huntington’s Disease: Identifying the need for psychological intervention. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 137-144.
53.
Tibben, A. , Frets, P. G., van de Kamp, J. J., Niermeijer, M. F., Vegtervan der Vlis, M., Roos, R. A., Rooymans, H. G., van Ommen, G. J., & Verhage, F. (1993b). On attitudes and appreciation 6 months after predictive DNA testing for Huntington Disease in the Dutch program. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 103-111.
54.
Watson, P. , Lynch, H. T. (2001). Cancer risk in mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. Familial Cancer, 1, 57-60.
