Little is known about what makes for effective genetic counselling. Helping counselees adjust to their genetic situation is highlighted as a goal in most definitions of genetic counselling, but the processes involved in this are less clear. The current investigation focused on counselees’ perceptions of their genetic consultation as a possible influence on adjustment. Participants were all attending a Regional Genetics Clinic in the UK for the first time and were being seen for a variety of reasons. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Being seen by an ‘expert’ was seen as a positive aspect of attending the genetics clinic and one that was associated with receiving full information. The perception that either they, or the doctor, were able actively to do something about their situation, helped to relieve feelings of vulnerability. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the way genetic counselling is conducted.
Bernhardt, B. A. , Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits and outcomes of genetic counseling: Client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189-197.
2.
Biesecker, B. B. , & Marteau, T. M. (1999). The future of genetic counselling: An international perspective. Nature Genetics, 22, 133-137.
3.
Campion, P. D. , Butler, N. M., & Cox, A. D. (1992). Principle agendas of doctors and patients in general practice consultations. Family Practice, 9, 181-190.
4.
Chapple, A. , May, C., & Campion, P. (1995). Parental guilt: The part played by the clinical geneticist. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 4, 179-191.
5.
Clarke, A. (1993). Response to: What counts as success in genetic counselling?Journal of Medical Ethics, 19, 43-46.
6.
Clarke, A. , Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462-469.
7.
Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage.
8.
Fraser, F. C. (1974). Genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 636-659.
9.
Hallowell, N. , Murton, F., Statham, H., Green, J. M., & Richards, M. P. (1997). Women’s need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: A questionnaire, interview and observational study. British Medical Journal, 314, 281-283.
10.
Kessler, S. (1992). Process issues in genetic counselling. Birth Defects Series, 28, 1-10.
11.
Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287-295.
12.
McCarthy Veach, P. , Truesdell, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (1999). Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: An exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 191-215.
13.
Michie, S. , Axworthy, D., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1996). Genetic counselling: Predicting patient outcomes. Psychological Health, 11, 797-809.
14.
Michie, S. , Marteau, T., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: The psychological impact of meeting patients’ expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34, 237-241.
15.
Miller, S. M. (1981). Predictability and human stress: Towards a clarification of evidence and theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 203-256.
16.
Pembrey, M. E. , & Anionwu, E. N. (1996). Ethical aspects of genetic screening and diagnosis. In A. E. Emery, D. L. Rimoin, & E. Pyeritz (Eds.), Principles and practice of medical genetics. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
17.
Pope, C. , & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative research. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42-45.
18.
Richards, M. P. M. (1993). The new genetics: Some issues for social scientists. Sociology of Health and Illness, 15, 567-586.
19.
Richards, M. P. M. (1996). Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 217-230.
20.
Shiloh, S. , Avdor, O., & Goodman, R. M. (1990). Satisfaction with genetic counselling: Dimensions and measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 37, 522-529.
21.
Shiloh, S. , Ben-Sinai, R., & Keinan, G. (1999). Effects of controllability, predictability, and information-seeking style on interest in predictive genetic testing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1187-1195.
22.
Shiloh, S. , Berkenstadt, M., Meiran, N., Bat-Miriam-Knatznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1997). Mediating effects of perceived personal control in coping with a health threat: The case of genetic counselling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1146-1174.
23.
Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271.
24.
Smith, J. A. , Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage.
25.
Smith, J. A. , Michie, S., Allanson, A., & Elwy, R. (2000). Certainty and uncertainty in genetic counselling: A qualitative case study. Psychology and Health, 15, 1-12.
26.
Taylor, S. E. , Lichtman, R. R., & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 489-502.
