Health and illness in contemporary psychology are remarkably undertheorized, with the consequence that implicit definitions of these topics are unquestionably imported into health psychology. Largely inspired and oriented to the medical system, health psychology is often subservient to biomedically inspired theory or directed to solving the problems of the health care system, not those of its patients or those who might ultimately benefit from health knowledge. Qualitative approaches have attempted to reintroduce the voice of the patient/sufferer/individual back into health psychology but without adequate theoretical integration this work has been marginalized and ignored by mainstream health psychology in the service of medical modelling. The point is not to develop a health psychology as an exclusive disciplinary enclave but rather to open up the possibilities of a responsible knowing. Using Kathryn Addelson’s work on professional knowing I argue that the collective activity that constitutes health psychology can be made more explicit not only by devising reflexive theories and practices but by focusing on what the outcomes of that activity might be. Functional theories of health and illness, on the other hand, obscure our epistemological and moral commitments.
Aries, N., & Kennedy, L. (1990). The health labor force: The effects of change. In P. Conrad & R. Kern (Eds.), The sociology of health and illness: Critical perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp. 195–206). New York: St Martin's.
4.
Blair, A. (1993). Social class and the contextualization of illness experience. In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness (pp. 27–48). London: Routledge.
5.
Burke, M., & Stevenson, H. M. (1993). Fiscal crisis and restructuring in Medicare: The politics and political science of health in Canada. Health and Canadian Society, 1, 51–80.
6.
Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Powers, A. M. (1999). Motivations for condom use: Do pregnancy prevention goals undermine disease prevention among heterosexual young adults?Health Psychology, 18, 464–474.
7.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136.
9.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1951). Social anthropology. London: Cohen & West.
10.
Fox, N. J. (1994). Postmodernism, sociology and health. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11.
Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Kleinman, A. (1996). Suffering, ethics, and the politics of moral life. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 20, 287–290.
13.
Kugelmann, R. (1992). Stress: The nature and history of engineered grief. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
Leventhal, H. (1996) President's column. The Health Psychologist, 18(4), 1, 22.
15.
Lubek, I. (1993). Social psychology textbooks: An historical and social psychological analysis of conceptual filtering, consensus formation, career gatekeeping and conservatism in science. In H. J. Stam, L. P. Mos, W. Thorngate, & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. III) (pp. 359–378). New York: Springer Verlag.
16.
Marks, D. F. (1996). Health psychology in context. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 7–21.
17.
Mathieson, C. M., & Stam, H. J. (1995). Renegotiating identity: Cancer narratives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17, 283–306.
18.
Mills, J. A. (1998). Control: A history of behavioral psychology. New York: New York University Press.
19.
Miltenburg, R. (1997). De verpleegkundige praktijk in Nederland: Een geval van neglect voor ‘zorg’. Nursing practice in the Netherlands: A case of the neglect of ‘care’.] Paper presented at Netwerk IPB Verpleegkundige Kwaliteitszorg, November.
20.
Miltenburg, R. (1998). Over ziek zijn [On being ill]. Utrecht/Antwerp: Kosmos-Z&K.
21.
Murray, M., & Chamberlain, K. (1998). Qualitative research in health psychology: Developments and directions. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 291–295.
22.
O'Neil, W. M. (1995). American behaviorism: A historical and critical analysis. Theory & Psychology, 5, 285–306.
23.
Ostrove, J. M., Feldman, P., & Adler, N. E. (1999). Relations among socioeconomic status indicators and health for African-Americans and whites. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 451–463.
24.
Radley, A. (1994). Making sense of illness: The social psychology of health and illness. London: Sage.
25.
Renaud, M. (1993). Social sciences and medicine: Hygeia versus Panakeia?Health and Canadian Society, 1, 229–247.
26.
Robinson, D. N. (2000). Paradigms and ‘the myth of framework’: How science progresses. Theory & Psychology, 10, 39–47.
27.
Schwartz, G. E. (1982). Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 1040–1053.
28.
Smedslund, G. (2000). A pragmatic basis for judging models and theories in health psychology: The axiomatic method. Jouranl of Health Psychology, 5, 133–149.
29.
Spicer, J., & Chamberlain, K. (1996). Developing psychosocial theory in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 161–171.
30.
Stainton Rogers, W. (1996). Critical approaches to health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 65–77.
31.
Stam, H. J. (1988). The practice of health psychology and behavioral medicine: Whither theory? In W. J. Baker, L. P. Mos, H. V. Rappard, & H. J. Stam Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology pp. 313–325). New York: Springer Verlag.
32.
Stam, H. J. (1992). Troublesome bodies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 12(2), 31–36.
33.
Stam, H. J. (1996). Theory & practice. In C. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. V. Hezewijk, & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of theoretical psychology (pp. 24–32). Toronto: Captus Press.
34.
Stam, H. J. (in press). Theoretical psychology. In K. Pawlik & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International handbook of psychology. London: Sage.
35.
Stam, H. J., & Pasay, G. A. (1998). The historical case against null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 219–220.
36.
Stone, G. C. (1980). Psychology and the health system. In G. C. Stone, F. Cohen, & N. E. Adler (Eds.), Health psychology—A handbook (pp. 47–75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Stone, G. C., Weiss, S. M., Matarazzo, J. D., Miller, N. E., Rodin, J., Belar, C. D., Follick, M. J., & Singer, J. E. (1987). Health psychology: A discipline and a profession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Suppe, F. (1989). The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
39.
Taylor, S. E. (1999). Health psychology. Boston: McGraw Hill.
40.
Toombs, S. K. (1992). The meaning of illness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
41.
Turner, B. S. (1986). Sociology as an academic trade: Some reflections on centre and periphery in the sociology market. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 22, 272–282.
42.
Wennemo, I. (1993). Infant mortality, public policy, and inequality—A comparison of 18 industrialized countries, 1950–85. Sociology of Health and Illness, 15, 429–446.
43.
Williams, G. (1993). Chronic illness and the pursuit of virtue in everyday life. In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness (pp. 92–108). London: Routledge.
